Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

A Medical Practice in the Lothian NHS Board area

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201200574 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 August 2013

Full decision

Summary

Mrs C complained that her former GP did not investigate the symptoms she was reporting, and that this led to a delay in a spinal problem being diagnosed and treated. Mrs C had a complex medical history with various symptoms which she reported at various consultations at the medical practice, as well as during home visits and phone consultations. She was being treated for various medical conditions, some of which had symptoms that related to her spinal problem.

Our investigation, which included taking independent advice from one of our medical advisers, found that it was reasonable that the practice did not specifically investigate the possibility of a spinal problem. The adviser was of the view that many NHS GPs would have had difficulty in identifying or suspecting a spinal problem in the midst of the many and complex conditions from which Mrs C suffered. The adviser also noted that the first mention of a symptom that could specifically have related to a spinal problem, and which could have been followed-up, took place at a consultation at the practice in April 2012, which lasted for an hour. During the consultation, Mrs C had taken exception to a suggestion by the GP for a referral to another specialist, unrelated to the spinal problem. She had left the consultation and four days later made a formal complaint to the practice. In her letter she indicated that she and her husband no longer wished to be patients there.

The practice had reviewed Mrs C's complaint letter, and as they felt that the doctor/patient relationship had broken down, had applied to the local health board to have Mr and Mrs C allocated to another practice, which happened in early May. By the middle of June, Mrs C's new GP had ordered a MRI (a specialist type of imaging) scan, which revealed the spinal problem. Our investigation found that, in the circumstances, it was not unreasonable that the original practice did not follow up the specific symptom reported in April 2012.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201200574 as a PDF (11.6 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving A Medical Practice in the Lothian NHS B…

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202204217 01 Mar 2024 C complained about the care and treatment that they received from the practice prior to receiving a diagnosis of a … Upheld
202203433 01 Nov 2023 C complained about the care and treatment their spouse (A) received from the practice. A had contacted the practice on … Not Upheld
202206401 01 Oct 2023 C complained about the care and treatment provided by the practice. C was diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS, a … Not Upheld
202104070 01 Jun 2023 C complained about the care and treatment provided to their partner (A). A had been suffering from an extended period … Not Upheld
202008024 01 Feb 2023 C complained that the practice failed to refer them for an x-ray following a fall, which contributed to a delay … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation