Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Scottish Water

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201200508 Sector Water Category sewer flooding - external Decided 01 October 2012

View Scottish Water scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Ms C complained about long-term flooding in her area and that Scottish Water had failed to resolve the matter. Our investigation revealed that Scottish Water were not at fault. Although their water pipes did not have sufficient capacity, their funding regime does not provide for the circumstances in question, where a major upgrade of the local pipe network is needed. We explained the situation in detail to Ms C and also passed on information from Scottish Water that they were working with other organisations, in the hope that some form of joint project, with funding coming from elsewhere, might be possible in a few years' time. We acknowledged that Ms C would be likely to find this disappointing but concluded that, as there had been no failings by Scottish Water, there were no grounds to uphold her complaint.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201200508 as a PDF (11.09 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Scottish Water

Reference Date Summary Outcome
201903741 01 Oct 2021 C operated a bed and breakfast business from their home (the premises) and a number of years ago was identified … Not Upheld
201907203 01 Feb 2021 C complained that Scottish Water had failed to respond appropriately to a number of flooding incidents in their property. C … Not Upheld
201806416 01 Sep 2019 Mr C complained that Scottish Water (SW) delayed in reinstating a permanent water supply to his property and that their … Partly Upheld
201810639 01 May 2019 This summary is linked to case 201608499 in relation to Clear Business Water. Mr C complained to Clear Business Water … Upheld
201801415 01 Mar 2019 Mr C complained that Scottish Water had failed to resolve the flooding issues he was experiencing and that they had … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation