Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

North Ayrshire Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201200342 Sector Local Government Category handling of application (complaints by opponents) Decided 01 October 2013

View North Tyneside Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C complained that the council failed to deal with a planning application in line with the appropriate procedures and to appropriately take his objections into account. He also said that they failed to respond reasonably to his enquiries or deal with his complaint appropriately.

Our investigation found that the council had dealt with the planning application in line with its published scheme of delegation and that the decision was properly made. The report produced by the planning officer dealt appropriately with the objections received and the council had provided two detailed responses to Mr C's complaints. Although there were minor errors in the handling of the complaint, the council had identified and apologised for these, and there was no evidence that they had affected the council's decision.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201200342 as a PDF (10.93 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving North Ayrshire Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202004623 01 Jun 2024 C complained about the advice received and actions taken by trading standards in relation to concerns that they had reported … Not Upheld
202007741 01 Mar 2023 C complained that the council's response to their reports of anti-social behaviour had been inadequate. C said that their neighbour … Not Upheld
201807397 01 Nov 2020 C complained that the council, as planning authority, failed to provide reasonable justification to discharge two conditions relating to an … Not Upheld
201807030 01 Sep 2020 Mr C complained about the council's communication with him. Mr C owns a flat in a building in which the … Upheld
201900245 01 Aug 2020 Ms C complained about the council's handling of a planning application for a housing development adjacent to her property. Ms … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation