Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Business Stream Ltd

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201105182 Sector Water Category charging method / calculation Decided 01 October 2012

Full decision

Summary

Ms C complained that Business Stream had wrongly assessed her property as a business and that she was billed according to this. We investigated the complaint and considered all the available information, including Business Stream's complaints file and the bills issued to Ms C. We consulted the appropriate section of the Scottish Assessors Association website (which provides information about properties and rateable values) and Business Stream's billing policy for such properties.

We found that Ms C's property was referred to as a guest house and that its rateable value had been apportioned accordingly (the business element being the greater part). In the circumstances, Business Stream's policy required them to charge appropriately, based on this information. We found that Business Stream were acting in accordance with their policy by charging Ms C, and did not uphold the complaint.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201105182 as a PDF (11.08 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Business Stream Ltd

Reference Date Summary Outcome
201103715 01 Feb 2013 An employee of Scottish Water visited Mr C's business premises and advised that he was going to install a water … Upheld
201104142 01 Feb 2013 Mr C complained that Business Stream failed to read his meter between April 2011 and January 2012. He said that, … Partly Upheld
201201210 01 Feb 2013 Mr C complained on behalf of a golf club about Business Stream. He complained that Business Stream had sent the … Partly Upheld
201202733 01 Feb 2013 There was a leak in a pipe which fed a field trough. This was not detected and Ms C was … Partly Upheld
201200041 01 Feb 2013 Mr C complained about a lack of assistance from Business Stream when he attempted to investigate a suspected water leak … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation