Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Scottish Borders Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Partly Upheld Reference 201104874 Sector Local Government Category handling of application (complaints by opponents) Decided 01 November 2012

View Scottish Sports Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C lives close to a church building which had fallen out of use. It had been the subject of unsuccessful planning applications for conversion and change of use to flats. In late 2009 a successful application was made to convert the building to a crematorium. Mr C and his wife did not live close enough to the building to be notified about this application. In the autumn of 2011, however, Mr C became aware of the provisions of the Cremation Act 1902 (the Act), which stipulate that no new crematorium should be built closer than 200 yards from the nearest house or 50 yards from a public road, without the permission of owners and occupiers. Mr C complained to the council, saying that they had failed to have proper regard for the Act in granting planning consent for the conversion and failed to protect Mr C's residential amenity; unreasonably delayed in dealing with his complaint, and unreasonably failed to answer his questions about their response to a Scottish Government consultation on the Act.

After seeking independent advice from our planning adviser, we found that the council, with qualification, were entitled to decide that the distance stipulations were not relevant to the granting of planning consent as they formed part of a different regulatory framework. There was also no evidence that the amenity of residents was disregarded when determining the application, and we did not uphold these complaints. We found that there had indeed been a delay in dealing with Mr C's complaint (but the council had apologised) and that they had neglected to answer his query about the council's consultation response. That issue was resolved by a senior officer explaining an apparent inconsistency. We, therefore, upheld both of those complaints, but made no recommendations.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201104874 as a PDF (11.56 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Scottish Borders Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202206940 01 Sep 2024 C complained that the council unreasonably failed to investigate and respond appropriately to incidents of bullying behaviour towards their child … Upheld
202002441 01 May 2023 C cares for their spouse (A) who has Alzheimer's disease. C complained about the council's social work department, after they … Not Upheld
202003481 01 Oct 2022 C complained that social work failed to reasonably assess A’s needs following a hospital admission, in relation to whether they … Partly Upheld
201902069 01 Aug 2021 C complained about the council's social work involvement with their child (A). A had a range of conditions that affected … Upheld
201901597 01 Jun 2021 C complained that the council failed to provide kinship care allowance after they had moved into the area from England, … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation