Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Scottish Water

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201103863 Sector Water Category Sewer flooding - external Decided 01 July 2012

View Scottish Water scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mrs C complained that Scottish Water were doing nothing to resolve the flooding she had experienced several times. She explained that after heavy rainfall, her garden was flooded. The water was sometimes higher than the top step at her front door, although the water did not enter the house because Scottish Water had given her sandbags and a door guard. She said the flooding prevented her from getting out and had ruined her garden. She also said that Scottish Water had refused to compensate her for the damage.

Our investigation revealed that Scottish Water acknowledged that there was a flooding problem in Mrs C's neighbourhood and had been actively and continuously trying to resolve it. For various reasons, they had been unable to find a solution but now planned to appoint engineers to see what could be done. They had kept in contact with Mrs C, usually by telephone, and, after a few months, had sent a detailed letter to local residents to update them on what was happening. They also told Mrs C that as they had not been negligent they would not pay compensation.

We explained to Mrs C that flooding could be a very difficult problem to resolve. For example, there may be more than one cause, and other organisations, such as the local authority, could share responsibility in the matter. Flooding is not always the fault of Scottish Water sewers and Scottish Water could not always get funding to resolve major flooding problems. We explained to her that Scottish Water’s funding was part of a complex process, in line with government requirements. Scottish Water could not simply decide to spend extra money or increase customers' water charges to give themselves extra money. We also explained that it was not Scottish Water’s responsibility to deal with all rainwater. Some rainwater was the responsibility of the local authority, who had separate sewers of their own.

In respect of Scottish Water’s action to try to resolve Mrs C's problem, we considered that they had actively been trying, and were continuing to try, to resolve the situation and that there was no evidence that their handling of it was unacceptable. In respect of the compensation claim, our role in such complaints is, broadly speaking, limited to considering whether Scottish Water followed their procedures in reaching their decision. It is not for us to decide whether compensation should be paid or, if so, how much. We found no evidence that Scottish Water had done anything wrong when deciding not to pay compensation.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201103863 as a PDF (18.61 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Scottish Water

Reference Date Summary Outcome
201903741 01 Oct 2021 C operated a bed and breakfast business from their home (the premises) and a number of years ago was identified … Not Upheld
201907203 01 Feb 2021 C complained that Scottish Water had failed to respond appropriately to a number of flooding incidents in their property. C … Not Upheld
201806416 01 Sep 2019 Mr C complained that Scottish Water (SW) delayed in reinstating a permanent water supply to his property and that their … Partly Upheld
201810639 01 May 2019 This summary is linked to case 201608499 in relation to Clear Business Water. Mr C complained to Clear Business Water … Upheld
201801415 01 Mar 2019 Mr C complained that Scottish Water had failed to resolve the flooding issues he was experiencing and that they had … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation