Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Highland NHS Board

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) No Decision Reached Reference 201102485 Sector Health Category Clinical treatment / Diagnosis Decided 01 July 2012

View NHS Highland scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mrs C suffered urinary problems and underwent a cystoscopy (a medical procedure used to examine the inside of the bladder) in hospital. She subsequently developed symptoms similar to cystitis and was diagnosed to have contracted pseudomonas (a serious infection caused by bacteria). She complained that the board failed to follow appropriate decontamination procedures before carrying out the cystoscopy. While responding to our investigation enquiries for further information, the board found that there had in fact been a case of cross contamination. This had not been identified when Mrs C initially made her complaint to the board.

As a result of this new information, Mrs C decided to take legal action against the board, and subsequently withdrew her complaint with us. As a result, we made no finding on her complaint.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201102485 as a PDF (16.53 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Highland NHS Board

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202408152 01 Jun 2026 C complained about the care and treatment provided to their child (A). A was urgently referred to the Child and … Upheld
202306996 01 Mar 2026 C complained that the board did not take reasonable action regarding their referrals. C was privately assessed by specialists in … Upheld
202307598 01 Sep 2025 C complained on behalf of a family member (A) about the care and treatment that A received during two presentations … Upheld
202404349 01 Aug 2025 C complained about the care and treatment provided to their late parent (A). A was admitted to hospital due to … Upheld
202300524 01 Jul 2025 C complained about the care and treatment that the board provided to their parent (A). The complaint relates to several … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation