Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Scottish Government

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Partly Upheld Reference 201101886 Sector Scottish Government Category policy/administration Decided 01 April 2012

View Scottish Government scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C rears cattle. He complained about the actions of an officer working on behalf of the Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency (AHVLA) (an executive agency of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, working partly on behalf of the Scottish Government). He also complained about the AHVLA's handling of his complaints.

Mr C complained that the officer had been aware of the location of some of his cattle, yet had written asking for clarification of their whereabouts. Mr C said that one of the officer's colleagues had told the officer where the cattle were. We did not , however, uphold this complaint as there was no evidence available to suggest that the officer was in fact aware of the location of the cattle. Although there appeared to have been some misunderstanding during the correspondence between the officer and Mr C, it was clear that the movements of the cattle were complex and we considered it reasonable for the officer to seek clarification of their whereabouts.

Mr C also complained that the officer had unreasonably requested that Mr C present his cattle for testing, when the officer had not done anything about the situation for over two years. Our investigation established there were a number of sound reasons why he had not made contact with Mr C during that time. These included that Mr C had made a complaint about the officer to the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons; there were ongoing criminal proceedings against Mr C in relation to the Tuberculosis Order 2007; and the Rural Payments and Inspections Directorate were trying to complete inspections of the cattle. The officer had, therefore, been advised to await the conclusion of all of these before contacting Mr C again about tuberculosis testing, which is why the delay occurred. On that basis we did not uphold this complaint.

We upheld Mr C's complaint about the AHVLA's complaints handling, as we found that they did not respond fully to all aspects of Mr C's complaint letter.

Recommendation We recommended that Scottish Government: • review their complaints handling procedure to ensure complainants receive full responses to complaints.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201101886 as a PDF (23.13 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Scottish Government

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202005412 01 May 2022 C was a grower of seed potatoes. They complained about the actions of the Scottish Agricultural Science Agency (SASA), a … Partly Upheld
201904053 01 May 2021 C complained the Scottish Government had repeatedly failed to provide them with accurate information about agricultural grants that they were … Partly Upheld
201905247 01 Nov 2020 C joined the Fair Start Scotland programme (an employment support service which aims to help voluntary participants find work). Fair … Upheld
201609429 01 Jan 2018 Mr C's complaint concerns an application he made to the government's Rural Payments and Inspections Division for payments under the … Not Upheld
201507681 01 Aug 2017 Ms C complained on behalf of Mrs A, who is the director of a company. Ms C complained about the … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation