Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

A Dental Practice, Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Partly Upheld Reference 201100178 Sector Health Category clinical treatment; diagnosis Decided 01 February 2012

Full decision

Summary

Ms C made several complaints about her dental practice. She complained that her dentist failed to deliver the appropriate treatment and service when she asked him to check on her bridge. She also complained that either the dentist or the dental practice failed to ensure that the dental hospital received her x-rays within a reasonable time, and that the failure to do so led to a delay in her being seen at the dental hospital and so exacerbated the decay in the teeth supporting the bridge.

On investigation we found that the actions of the dentist did not result in the loss of the bridge. The bridge had failed due to Ms C having extensive decay in both supporting teeth. The dentist had provided Ms C with appropriate advice, which was to have a new bridge fitted or otherwise for him to refer her to the dental hospital. Therefore, we did not uphold this part of Ms C’s complaint.

Ms C asked to be referred to the dental hospital. Following the referral, x-rays were required by the dental hospital. However, due to a lack of record-keeping by the dental practice, our investigation was unable to establish what had occurred regarding the taking of the x-rays and when they were sent to and received by the dental hospital. We, therefore, found that the dentist or the dental practice failed to ensure that the dental hospital received the x-rays within a reasonable time and upheld this part of Ms C’s complaint.

We accepted that, as a result, Ms C had to wait a number of months before being seen and given a diagnosis at the dental hospital. While we considered that part of this delay was caused by the dental hospital not having Ms C’s x-rays we also considered that part of the delay was also due to Ms C’s personal circumstances. Furthermore, while the delay caused by the lack of x-rays was unfortunate we considered that it would not have had any effect on the outcome in Ms C’s case and we, therefore, did not uphold this part of the complaint.

Recommendations

We recommended that the practice: • review their record-keeping so that telephone calls received and made in relation to a patient’s treatment are recorded; and • review their practices and procedures so as to ensure that a patient’s x-rays, where appropriate, are sent to and received by the dental hospital.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201100178 as a PDF (20.21 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving A Dental Practice, Greater Glasgow and …

Reference Date Summary Outcome
201100349 01 Jan 2012 Mr C contacted his dental practice to bring forward an appointment for treatment. He was told by the practice manager … Not Upheld
201100050 01 Jan 2012 Mrs C complained on behalf of her son (Mr A) about the care and treatment he received from his dentist. … Upheld
201100466 01 Dec 2011 Ms C was referred to a dentist for root canal treatment under sedation. Following treatment, Ms C developed an infection, … Partly Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation