Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Falkirk Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201100032 Sector Local Government Category planning Decided 01 February 2012

View Falkirk Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mrs C complained that the council did not take her concerns appropriately into account when planning Core Paths (a system of public access paths) in the area she lives and that she was not given appropriate information about the process. She appealed to the Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals (DPEA) and was concerned about the impartiality of the DPEA’s conclusions in relation to her objections. Mrs C complained that there were long delays in the council responding to her letters during the complaints procedure.

Having looked at the evidence provided by the council, we concluded that Mrs C's concerns had been appropriately taken into consideration, and that she had been given advice and relevant information throughout every stage of the Core Paths planning process. In addition, we considered that there was insufficient evidence to support that the council had delayed in responding to Mrs C complaint and did not uphold the complaints.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201100032 as a PDF (13.83 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Falkirk Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202307184 01 Oct 2025 C, a council tenant, complained that the council had failed to replace their kitchen, which was outdated and in a … Partly Upheld
202403907 01 May 2025 C complained that the council unreasonably failed to assess their housing application in accordance with their policies and procedures. C … Upheld
202402009 01 Apr 2025 C complained to the council that they had unlawfully carried out repairs to the communal roof and chimney of a … Upheld
201900986 01 Mar 2023 C complained about the service provided by the council's social work service in connection with their child (A), who resided … Upheld
201910292 01 Apr 2022 C is the owner of a 'four-in-a-block' flat and the other three properties in the block are owned by the … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation