Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201004683 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 July 2013

View NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Ms C's daughter (Miss A) was diagnosed with throat cancer and was admitted to hospital for chemotherapy and radiotherapy. She was found to have chest and urinary infections, so her chemotherapy and radiotherapy were postponed until these were treated. When her condition improved, Miss A received chemotherapy. After a second course of chemotherapy, she became neutropenic (the blood cells that fight infection had reduced) and was taken to another hospital, where she died.

Ms C complained that her daughter's condition was not properly monitored. In particular, she noted that blood tests were not taken daily, as had happened with another family member with cancer. Ms C felt that, had Miss A's blood results been closely monitored, she could have been treated and her prognosis might have been better. Ms C also complained about staff communication with the family. She was told after Miss A's death that the tumour was one of the largest the consultant had seen. She said that had she known this earlier, she might have decided to keep Miss A at home during her final days.

We took independent advice from one of our medical advisers, who confirmed that blood tests are not carried out daily following chemotherapy. This is because it will already be known that the treatment makes the patient neutropenic. Neutropenia is only an issue if the patient develops sepsis (a severe blood or tissue infection), and this is not diagnosed through blood tests, but from the patient's physical symptoms. If there is evidence of sepsis, then blood tests would be carried out. We found that Miss A’s treatment and monitoring was in line with the board's protocol for treating patients with head and neck cancers.

The evidence also suggested that communication with the family was good, although we were unable to establish whether specific information was provided about the size of the tumour. It was, however, clear from the records that both Miss A and her sister were told the tumour was extensive; and that Miss A continued with hospital treatment in full knowledge of this.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201004683 as a PDF (11.71 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202205600 01 Aug 2023 C complained about the care and treatment provided to their late parent (A) by the board's out of hours (OOH) … Not Upheld
201803746 01 Nov 2019 Mrs C complained that the board's decision to not provide her child (Child A) with an emergency appointment was unreasonable. … Not Upheld
201802124 01 Oct 2019 Mr and Mrs C complained on behalf of their child (Child A) about the care and treatment they received from … Not Upheld
201708611 01 May 2019 Ms C raised concern about a number of issues in relation to the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (the … Partly Upheld
201803350 01 Mar 2019 Ms C complained about the care and treatment she received at the GP out-of-hours service at Gartnavel General Hospital when … Partly Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation