Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

The City of Edinburgh Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201002903 Sector Local Government Category disabled parking bays; tram works Decided 01 June 2011

View City of Edinburgh Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

As part of the Edinburgh Trams project, the City of Edinburgh Council have carried out works to alter the road network in some areas of Edinburgh City Centre. The changes to the road network to support the new tram infrastructure were carried out using a series of public consultations in conjunction with Traffic Regulation Orders (TROs).

The council decided to relocate the disabled parking bays in Frederick Street from near Princes Street to near George Street as part of this programme. Mrs C raised a number of specific issues about this change. These included the accessibility of the new location, the process of consultation (which she felt did not include disability groups or interaction with the blue badge scheme), and an assurance she said the council had given to reverse the change when possible. Mrs C was also unhappy with the reasons given to support the change and said that the changes breached her human rights and the terms of the Disability Discrimination Act.

Our investigation looked at the regulations that councils must follow when applying for TROs and at guidance issued by the Disability Rights Commission and the Scottish Government. As changes to road management can only be made as part of the TRO process, our investigation was restricted to considering whether the process had been followed out appropriately.

During the investigation, we found that the council had complied with the guidance and procedures. This included appropriate consultation with disability groups and compliance with the appropriate guidance. There was no link between the blue badge scheme and the positioning of disabled spaces that the council needed to consider and the reasons the council gave were reasonable. We found no evidence that the council had given a specific assurance that the change would be reversed.

While we did not uphold any aspect of the complaint, we accepted that Mrs C had been affected by the change. We noted that there would likely be a further opportunity for Mrs C and disability groups to comment on the change as part of any future TRO which would follow completion of the tram scheme itself.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201002903 as a PDF () Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving The City of Edinburgh Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202505687 01 Jun 2026 C complained to the council about damp and mould in their rental property. C had been moved to the property … Upheld
202404014 01 Feb 2026 C complained that the council did not properly consider their concerns about work being carried out on a neighbour’s summerhouse … Not Upheld
202302915 01 Apr 2025 A & B complained to the council about their handling of their claims procedure in relation to the Trams to … Upheld
202303840 01 Oct 2024 C is the grandparent of A and B, whose parents were separated. C complained about the actions of the council … Partly Upheld
202301380 01 Aug 2024 C complained about the council’s social work service during the pre-adoptive process of their child (A). C complained about the … Partly Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation