View COPFS scorecard
Mr C complained that the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) (including the Lord Advocate) had failed to adequately respond to correspondence from him. Having carefully reviewed the correspondence between Mr C and the COPFS, we were satisfied that the responses he received were adequate and in line with the COPFS customer feedback policy.
View Decision Report 201002513 as a PDF (10.81 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018
| Reference | Date | Summary | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 202002728 | 01 Nov 2022 | C complained about the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS), regarding interactions they had before, during and after a … | Upheld |
| 201910071 | 01 Mar 2022 | C complained about the way that the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) dealt with their communications with them … | Partly Upheld |
| 201802649 | 01 Jun 2019 | Mrs C complained that the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) unreasonably delayed in investigating the death of her … | Upheld |
| 201706996 | 01 Dec 2018 | Ms C complained about the service provided by the Crown Office and Procurator Service (COPFS) when they were dealing with … | Upheld |
| 201603257 | 01 Oct 2017 | Mrs C complained about the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS). Mrs C was required to attend court on … | Upheld |