Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Fife Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201000351 Sector Local Government Category Continuing care Decided 01 May 2012

View Fife Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Ms C was the main carer for her mother, who was bed-bound after being discharged home from hospital, and who remained so until her death some two and a half years later.

Ms C complained about the council, who were responsible for elements of her mother's care. She said that they delayed over an application for direct payments made before her mother went into hospital; failed to ensure that an appropriate care package was provided; failed to provide respite care; ignored Ms C's power of attorney by convening a meeting of professionals without telling her; and misled Ms C over the issue of equipment, as well as not providing and maintaining clean and functioning equipment.

We did not uphold any of Ms C's complaints, as we did not find that the council had acted wrongly. A care package was in place for about fourteen months, with care supplied by a private firm, but Ms C felt that the hours were inadequate and was unhappy with the quality of care. She met the provider's manager and during the meeting told them that they should not return. An assessment with council officers then took place with a view to establishing a new care package, but Ms C ended this without the assessment being finished. Some issues that Ms C complained about depended on an assessment being carried out, but due to postponements this was not done until some six months after the original package stopped, and the process was not completed before Ms C's mother died.

Although we felt that it was unfortunate that the care package was not reintroduced and respite care provided, we did not find that there was any unreasonable delay attributable to the council. We also found that the meeting of professionals was appropriate in the circumstances. The issue about equipment was in fact resolved some time before Ms C complained to us, and there was no evidence of a deliberate attempt to mislead Ms C as to who had been responsible for maintaining the equipment.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201000351 as a PDF (18.21 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Fife Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202411894 01 Oct 2025 C owns a holiday let in a conservation area. The adjacent, terraced property was demolished but not rebuilt, leaving an … Not Upheld
202308876 01 Jul 2025 C complained to the council that their teenage child (A)'s school had not taken reasonable action following the report of … Upheld
202310572 01 Jun 2025 C complained that the council unreasonably failed to follow relevant processes and procedures in managing and responding to bullying behaviour … Upheld
202206015 01 Nov 2024 C complained that the council had failed to address excessive noise from a recreational area near their home. We found … Partly Upheld
202204206 01 May 2024 C complained about their housing. C had moved into the property because they were downsizing from their previous home. The … Partly Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation