Delegated powers in the Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill (as amended at Stage 2)

The Committee finds the revised power acceptable in principle and is content that it is subject to the affirmative procedure.

The Committee finds the power acceptable in principle and is content that it is subject to the affirmative procedure.

The Committee notes the power.

While recognising the context of this change being introduced via a Stage 2 amendment, the Committee considers this is the sort of power which it might have normally expected to be subject to further enhanced “super-affirmative” procedures, or even being introduced via primary legislation.

The Committee considers a statutory requirement to consult with the Crofting Commission, persons that the Scottish Ministers consider to be representative of the interests of crofters, and any other person they consider appropriate prior to making regulations under this power, should be a pre-condition of its use.

The Committee finds the power acceptable in principle and is content that it is subject to the negative procedure.

The Committee finds the revised power acceptable in principle and is content that it is subject to the negative procedure.

The Committee finds the revised power acceptable in principle and is content that it is not subject to any parliamentary procedure.