PPO Fatal Incident

Douglas Clayton

Natural causes Report published

HMP Frankland (Prison)

Recommendations

No specific recommendations were made in this investigation report.
Full Report Text
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Independent investigation into
the death of
Mr Douglas Clayton,
a prisoner at HMP Frankland,
on 22 December 2024
A report by the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman
Third Floor, 10 South Colonnade Email: mail@ppo.gov.uk T l 020 7633 4100
Canary Wharf, London E14 4PU Web: www.ppo.gov.uk
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
© Crown copyright, 2026
This report is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0. To view this licence,
visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3
Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission
from the copyright holders concerned.
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
1. The Prisons and Probation Ombudsman aims to make a significant contribution to
safer, fairer custody and community supervision. One of the most important ways in
which we work towards that aim is by carrying out independent investigations into
deaths, due to any cause, of prisoners, young people in detention, residents of
approved premises and detainees in immigration centres.
2. If my office is to best assist His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) in
ensuring the standard of care received by those within service remit is appropriate,
our recommendations should be focused, evidenced and viable. This is especially
the case if there is evidence of systemic failure.
3. In December 2017, Mr Douglas Clayton was sentenced to 18 years in prison for
sexual offences. He died of bronchopneumonia on 22 December 2024, at HMP
Frankland. He was 80 years old. We offer our condolences to Mr Clayton’s family
and friends.
4. The Ombudsman’s office wrote to Mr Clayton’s next of kin to explain the
investigation and to ask if they had any matters they wanted us to consider. Mr
Clayton’s next of kin enquired about his leg ulcers and asked for a copy of our
report. The next of kin’s question has been addressed in the clinical review.
5. NHS England commissioned an independent clinical reviewer, to review Mr
Clayton’s clinical care at Frankland. The clinical reviewer’s report is attached as
Annex 1.
6. The PPO investigator and the clinical reviewer jointly interviewed three healthcare
staff on 24 April 2025. The transcripts of the interviews are attached as Annex 2.
7. The clinical reviewer concluded that the clinical care Mr Clayton received at
Frankland was not of the required standard and was partially equivalent to what he
could have expected to receive in the community.
8. She found that although there were elements of good care, there was no evidence
in Mr Clayton’s medical records of a care coordinator to facilitate all his care needs,
and although Mr Clayton was recorded as a complex case, there were no complex
care notes in his medical records. The clinical reviewer also found that Mr Clayton’s
complex care plan had not been updated since March 2024, and his ReSPECT
form that was activated in 2020, was not reviewed or updated during his time at
Frankland. The clinical reviewer made recommendations not related to Mr Clayton’s
death that the Head of Healthcare will wish to address.
9. Ms Wallis investigated the non-clinical issues relating to Mr Clayton’s care. We did
not find any non-clinical issues of sufficient concern to warrant a recommendation.
Governor to note
10. The Managing Conveyance Policy Framework says that ambulance staff may bring
patient devices (which include a laptop/pad containing medical applications) into a
prison for the purpose of delivering clinical care. Ambulance staff are also permitted
to enter the prison with mobile phones (both work and personal) to ensure their
entry into the prison is not unduly delayed.
Prisons and Probation Ombudsman 1
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
11. When the first set of paramedics arrived at the prison, it took 10 minutes for them to
get from the prison gate to Mr Clayton because they were searched for technical
devices. Although this did not affect the emergency care given to Mr Clayton, the
ambulance crew could have arrived more promptly if prison staff had adhered to the
policy.
12. The Safer Custody team told us that a mandatory search would have been
conducted to ensure no unauthorised persons were on the vehicle and to ensure
the ambulance staff had no personal mobile phones in possession as per their
policy. However, according to Frankland’s Escorting Vehicles Policy, ambulance
paramedics should not be searched when entering the prison, and the policy is not
clear about whether technical devices should be seized at the gate before entering
the prison. We bring this matter to the Governor’s attention.
13. The initial report was shared with HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS).
HMPPS did not find any factual inaccuracies.
14. Mr Clayton’s family received a copy of the initial report. They did not make any
comments.
Adrian Usher September 2025
Prison and Probation Ombudsman
Inquest
At the inquest held on 15 December 2025 the coroner concluded Mr Clayton died of
natural causes.
2 Prisons and Probation Ombudsman
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Third Floor, 10 South Colonnade Email: mail@ppo.gov.uk T l 020 7633 4100
Canary Wharf, London E14 4PU Web: www.ppo.gov.uk
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

Case Details

Date of Death 22 December 2024
Report Published 13 February 2026
Age 71-80
Gender
Responsible Body HMP Frankland
Recommendations
0
Inquest Date 15 December 2025

Documents