PPO Fatal Incident

Dean Collins

Natural causes Report published

HMP Birmingham (Prison)

Recommendations (2)

Recommendation 1 → The Head of Healthcare

The Head of Healthcare should review processes for enabling urgent same day GP or other senior clinician appointments to ensure review of unwell patients in a timely fashion.

healthcare
Recommendation 2 → The Governor

The Governor should review how effective previous work to educate managers about the risk assessment process and the Graham judgement has been and provide additional measures, including additional training, where necessary.

safety
Full Report Text
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Independent investigation into
the death of Mr Dean Collins,
a prisoner at HMP Birmingham,
on 27 December 2024
A report by the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman
Third Floor, 10 South Colonnade Email: mail@ppo.gov.uk T l 020 7633 4100
Canary Wharf, London E14 4PU Web: www.ppo.gov.uk
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
© Crown copyright, 2026
This report is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0. To view this licence,
visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3
Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission
from the copyright holders concerned.
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Summary
1. The Prisons and Probation Ombudsman aims to make a significant contribution to
safer, fairer custody and community supervision. One of the most important ways in
which we work towards that aim is by carrying out independent investigations into
deaths, due to any cause, of prisoners, young people in detention, residents of
approved premises and detainees in immigration centres.
2. If my office is to best assist His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) in
ensuring the standard of care received by those within service remit is appropriate,
our recommendations should be focused, evidenced and viable. This is especially
the case if there is evidence of systemic failure.
3. Mr Dean Collins died in hospital from multiple organ failure on 27 December 2024,
while a prisoner at HMP Birmingham. This was caused by hepatic cirrhosis which
was in turn caused by a hepatitis B and hepatitis C infection. He was 46 years old.
We offer our condolences to his family and friends.
4. The clinical reviewer concluded that the clinical care that Mr Collins received at
Birmingham was not of the required standard and was not equivalent to that which
he could have expected to receive in the community. She found that there was a
missed opportunity for Mr Collins to have received more timely treatment and his
admission to hospital was delayed by approximately 24 hours. The clinical reviewer
made a recommendation about this. She also made three other recommendations
which were not relevant to Mr Collins’ death but which the Head of Healthcare will
want to address.
5. We found that the officer who completed the escort risk assessment did not seek
input from healthcare staff when applying restraints to Mr Collins. Although Mr
Collins was admitted to hospital on 21 December, escort staff did not open a
bedwatch log until two days later.
Recommendations
• The Head of Healthcare should review processes for enabling urgent same day GP
or other senior clinician appointments to ensure review of unwell patients in a timely
fashion.
• The Governor should review how effective previous work to educate managers
about the risk assessment process and the Graham judgement has been and
provide additional measures, including additional training, where necessary.
Prisons and Probation Ombudsman 1
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
The Investigation Process
6. HMPPS notified us of Mr Collins’ death on 28 December 2024.
7. NHS England commissioned an independent clinical reviewer to review Mr Collins’
clinical care at HMP Birmingham.
8. The PPO investigator investigated the non-clinical issues relating to Mr Collins’
care. She interviewed one member of staff from Birmingham on 11 February 2025.
9. The Ombudsman’s office wrote to Mr Collins’ next of kin, his brother, to explain the
investigation and to ask if he had any matters he wanted us to consider. He asked
the following questions which have been addressed in this report or in the clinical
review:
• Did Mr Collins report to prison staff that he was ill or seek help? If so, was it
followed up? If not, why not?
• Leading up to his death, had Mr Collins been ill in his cell? Was his ill health
simply not picked up?
• Mr Collins looked visibly unwell (he had a swollen body and discoloured/yellow
skin). How did staff not pick up these signs/physical changes?
• What was the delay in notifying Mr Collins’ next of kin that he had been admitted
to hospital? Mr Collins’ family was not told until the day after he was admitted to
hospital.
10. The initial report was shared with HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS).
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust pointed out a factual
inaccuracy, and this report has been amended accordingly. The action plan has
been annexed to this report.
11. Mr Collins’ family received a copy of the draft report. They did not make any
comments.
Previous deaths at HMP Birmingham
12. Mr Collins was the fifteenth prisoner to die at HMP Birmingham since 27 December
2021. Of the previous deaths, seven were from natural causes and four were self-
inflicted, one is awaiting classification, one was drug-related, and one was a
homicide.
13. Birmingham accepted our recommendation in 2022 that escort staff should
understand the legal position on the use of restraints and that decisions should be
based on the prisoner’s health and the risk presented at the time. Birmingham told
us that their risk assessment had a medical section, and the Duty Governor used
this information for the overall assessment. They said that members of staff who
failed to consider the prisoner’s risk and health at the time and do not evidence a
defensible decision were subject to an internal investigation.
2 Prisons and Probation Ombudsman
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Key Events
14. On 10 December 2024, Mr Dean Collins was sentenced to one month in prison for
contempt of court. He was admitted to HMP Birmingham and Nurse A completed
his initial health screen in reception. Mr Collins reported that he had alcohol
problems and a history of cocaine and heroin use. Nurse A referred him to the
Birmingham Recovery Team due to substance misuse. Mr Collins’ medical records
indicate that he had difficulty walking and used a walking aid.
15. On 11 December, the substance misuse service saw Mr Collins and he disclosed
that he had recently used drugs. Staff monitored him daily for five days and agreed
that he should undertake methadone and alcohol detoxification.
16. On 16 December, Nurse B saw Mr Collins and completed an alcohol withdrawal
assessment. The nurse noted that Mr Collins presented as settled and raised
concerns about his sleeping pattern. He was prescribed a short-term sleeping aid.
Ms A, a member of the substance misuse team, saw Mr Collins and he reported
that he wanted to remain abstinent from substances in custody.
17. On 19 December, Ms A saw Mr Collins on the wing. She noted that he appeared
yellow and did not look well. She sent a task to primary care for him to be reviewed.
18. On 20 December, Nurse C was called to see Mr Collins on the wing as he felt
unwell. She recorded that he was alert and orientated. He reported feeling lethargic
and he looked pale. Ms A spoke to Dr A, a GP operating at Birmingham, and told
him that Mr Collins had become jaundiced. Dr A recorded that Mr Collins needed an
urgent blood test.
19. On 21 December, a code blue was called due to Mr Collins’ presentation. Nurse D
attended to monitor him. On arrival, Mr Collins was lying on the bed, was not
making much sense and was jaundiced. His cellmate told her that Mr Collins had
been vomiting all night. Healthcare staff recorded that Mr Collins was due to have a
blood test that day but due to his decline in presentation, they sent him to hospital.
The ambulance left the prison at 10.45am.
20. Custodial Manager (CM) A completed an emergency escort risk assessment and
decided that Mr Collins should be restrained with double cuffs (where the prisoner’s
hands are handcuffed together and a second pair of handcuffs are applied,
attaching the prisoner to a prison officer). The healthcare section of the risk
assessment was not completed. CM A told us that this was to ensure the escort left
in a timely manner. He told us he had no information about Mr Collins’ condition,
and the decision to restrain him was based solely on the security assessment.
21. At 5.15pm, Mr Collins’ restraints were changed from double cuffs to an escort chain
(a long cable attached at one end to the prisoner and at the other to a prison officer)
when he was admitted to hospital.
22. At 2.58pm on 22 December, Nurse E received a phone call from the hospital,
asking for Mr Collins’ medical history. They told her that Mr Collins was intubated
and had been moved to the Intensive Care Unit. Medical records indicate that Mr
Collins’ restraints were removed.
Prisons and Probation Ombudsman 3
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
23. At 5.30pm, Mr A, the prison’s family liaison officer, contacted Mr Collins’ brother to
tell him that Mr Collins was in hospital and to explain his current condition.
Birmingham told us that they contacted Mr Collins’ brother when the situation
became critical and that Mr A first had to complete the relevant checks and obtain
the contact details for Mr Collins’ brother.
24. On 23 December, Nurse F contacted the hospital. They told her that Mr Collins was
in a critical but stable condition. They said that they had had a discussion with Mr
Collins’ brother the previous day and they had agreed to put in place an order not to
attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation if his heart or breathing stopped. They
confirmed he had liver failure. The bedwatch log was opened and it was noted that
Mr Collins was not restrained.
25. On 24 December, Mr A recorded that Mr Collins was in a serious condition and his
family were by his bedside.
26. On 26 December, Nurse E contacted the hospital. They told her that Mr Collins
remained ventilated and sedated.
27. On 27 December, Nurse E contacted the hospital. They said that they were going to
withdraw treatment as Mr Collins was not improving and this had been discussed
with his family. Hospital staff pronounced life extinct at 5.42pm. His family were with
him when he died.
Post-mortem report
28. The post-mortem report concluded that Mr Collins died from multiple organ failure.
This was caused by hepatic cirrhosis which was in turn caused by a hepatitis B and
hepatitis C infection.
29. An inquest into Mr Collins’ death was held on 5 August 2025. The Coroner
concluded that Mr Collins died from natural causes.
4 Prisons and Probation Ombudsman
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Findings
Clinical findings
30. The clinical reviewer concluded that the care that Mr Collins received was not of the
required standard and was not equivalent to that which he could have expected to
receive in the community.
31. The clinical reviewer found that a GP or other senior clinician should have reviewed
Mr Collins on the afternoon of 20 December when there were concerns that he was
jaundiced. She concluded that his condition warranted further urgent medical
assessment and his admission to hospital was delayed by approximately 24 hours.
She therefore made the following recommendation which we repeat:
The Head of Healthcare should review processes for enabling urgent same
day GP or other senior clinician appointments to ensure review of unwell
patients in a timely fashion.
Use of restraints
32. The Prison Service has a duty to protect the public when escorting prisoners
outside prison such as to hospital. It also has a responsibility to balance this by
treating prisoners with humanity. The level of restraints used should be necessary
in all the circumstances and based on a risk assessment which considers the risk of
escape, the risk to the public and takes into account a prisoner’s health and
mobility. A judgment in the High Court in 2007 (the Graham judgment) made it clear
that prison staff need to distinguish between a prisoner’s risk of escape when fit
(and the risk to the public in the event of an escape) and the prisoner’s risk when he
has a serious medical condition. It said that medical opinion about the prisoner’s
ability to escape must be considered as part of the assessment process and kept
under review as circumstances change.
33. An escort risk assessment must be completed for every hospital escort and
healthcare staff must always be involved in this process.
34. CM A completed the emergency risk assessment on 21 December 2024. He told us
that the medical section of the risk assessment was not completed to ensure the
escort left the prison in a timely manner. He said that as a result, he had no details
about Mr Collins’ medical condition and restrained him with double cuffs based
solely on a security assessment (which included that Mr Collins was on remand and
had a recorded history of violence, including threatening violence towards another
prisoner on 18 December). However, CM A said that if he had been aware of Mr
Collins’ condition at the time, this would likely have resulted in a different cuffing
arrangement, if any at all.
35. We have previously raised concerns about the inappropriate use of restraints at
Birmingham. The Operational Security Group Director for HMPPS, Mr B, told us
that, following earlier PPO recommendations, his team had reviewed a sample of
risk assessments from Birmingham and identified issues which had led to targeted
work at the prison to educate staff. A broader piece of work to review the national
Prisons and Probation Ombudsman 5
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
risk assessment process had led to changes to the policy, which is likely to be
published before the end of 2025.
36. Mr C, the Head of Safety, told us that the manager completing the emergency risk
assessment should speak to healthcare staff or paramedics and use this
information to complete the medical section. Mr C said that he expected the person
completing the risk assessment to obtain further information if they did not have
sufficient information to make a defensible decision.
37. Mr C told us that he encouraged managers to consider the Graham judgment when
making decisions about restraints and to take a prisoner’s mobility into
consideration, as well as any security risks. He told us that Birmingham have
conducted multiple briefings about the Graham judgment and all senior managers
were aware of it.
38. Although Mr Collins was admitted to hospital on 21 December, the bedwatch log (a
detailed account of events completed by staff accompanying the prisoner in
hospital) was not opened until 23 December. The medical records indicate that
restraints were removed on 22 December, and it is clear from the bedwatch logs
that Mr Collins was not restrained on 23 December. However, due to the lack of
earlier records, we have been unable to determine exactly when Mr Collins’
restraints were removed.
39. As CM A had no information about Mr Collins’ medical condition, he was unable to
make an informed decision about whether restraints should have been used. A
bedwatch log should have also been opened on 21 December. In light of this and
that we have made a previous recommendation to Birmingham about this issue, we
make the following recommendation:
The Governor should review how effective previous work to educate
managers about the risk assessment process and the Graham judgement has
been and provide additional measures, including additional training, where
necessary.
Family liaison
40. The Prison Safety Policy Framework states that prisoners who have a serious or
terminal illness must be encouraged to engage with their families or a nominated
person where it is appropriate to do so. If the prisoner is unable to communicate
their wishes, the prison should contact the next of kin or a nominated person and
give them an accurate account of what has happened, including treatment given,
whether the prisoner is in hospital and information about visiting the prisoner.
41. Mr Collins’ next of kin was concerned that he was not informed of Mr Collins’
condition until the day after he had been admitted to hospital. While we recognise
their concerns and distress, the prison acted reasonably and in line with policy
when contacting Mr Collins’ next of kin once it was clear that he was seriously
unwell.
Adrian Usher
Prisons and Probation Ombudsman December 2025
6 Prisons and Probation Ombudsman
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Third Floor, 10 South Colonnade Email: mail@ppo.gov.uk T l 020 7633 4100
Canary Wharf, London E14 4PU Web: www.ppo.gov.uk
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

Case Details

Report Published 17 April 2026
Age 41-50
Gender
Responsible Body HMP Birmingham
Recommendations
2

Documents

Recommendation Themes

healthcare (1) safety (1)