PPO Fatal Incident

Brian Jordan

Self-inflicted Report published

HMP Durham (Prison)

Recommendations

No specific recommendations were made in this investigation report.
Full Report Text
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Independent investigation into
the death of Mr Brian Jordan,
a prisoner at HMP Durham,
on 3 July 2024
A report by the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman
Third Floor, 10 South Colonnade Email: mail@ppo.gov.uk T l 020 7633 4100
Canary Wharf, London E14 4PU Web: www.ppo.gov.uk
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
© Crown copyright, 2025
This report is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0. To view this licence,
visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3
Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission
from the copyright holders concerned.
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
The Prisons and Probation Ombudsman aims to make a significant contribution to safer,
fairer custody and community supervision. One of the most important ways in which we
work towards that aim is by carrying out independent investigations into deaths, due to any
cause, of prisoners, young people in detention, residents of approved premises and
detainees in immigration centres.
If my office is to best assist His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) in
ensuring the standard of care received by those within service remit is appropriate, our
recommendations should be focused, evidenced and viable. This is especially the case if
there is evidence of systemic failure.
Mr Brian Jordan died on 3 July 2024, after he was found hanging in his cell at HMP
Durham. Staff and paramedics tried to resuscitate him but were unsuccessful. He was 60
years old. I offer my condolences to Mr Jordan’s family and friends.
Mr Jordan had been in prison for around three weeks, and died seven days after he was
convicted of his offences. In that time, he gave no indication to staff that he was at risk of
suicide or self-harm. I am satisfied that staff could not have foreseen his actions.
I make no recommendations.
This version of my report, published on my website, has been amended to remove the
names of staff and prisoners involved in my investigation.
Adrian Usher
Prisons and Probation Ombudsman February 2025
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Contents
Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1
The Investigation Process ................................................................................................ 2
Background Information ................................................................................................... 3
Key Events ....................................................................................................................... 4
Findings ........................................................................................................................... 7
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Summary
Events
1. On 14 June 2024, Mr Brian Jordan was remanded in custody, charged with sexual
offences, and sent to HMP Durham. When he arrived, Mr Jordan said he had no
thoughts of suicide or self-harm and declined the offer to be seen by the mental
health team.
2. On 27 June, Mr Jordan was convicted of sexual offences and sentenced to seven
years and seven months in prison.
3. At around 9.30am on 3 July, Mr Jordan rang his family. He asked his son to check
online for details of his cellmate’s offence. His son told him that there was no
information about his cellmate but there were details of Mr Jordan’s offence and
conviction in the local online paper. Mr Jordan became distressed and said he was
scared he would be attacked by other prisoners. He asked his son to buy the local
paper and said he would ring back later that morning.
4. At 10.43am, an officer unlocked Mr Jordan’s cell and saw him hanging from the top
bunk. She immediately called a medical emergency code, entered the cell and cut
the ligature. Another officer arrived quickly and they started CPR.
5. Staff and paramedics continued with the resuscitation attempts but were
unsuccessful. At 11.58am, paramedics pronounced Mr Jordan’s death.
Findings
6. Mr Jordan gave no indication to staff that he was at risk of suicide or self-harm.
They would have been unaware of the contents of his last phone call until after his
death. We are satisfied that staff could not have foreseen his actions.
7. We make no recommendations.
Prisons and Probation Ombudsman 1
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
The Investigation Process
8. HMPPS notified us of Mr Jordan’s death on 4 July 2024.
9. The investigator issued notices to staff and prisoners at HMP Durham informing
them of the investigation and asking anyone with relevant information to contact
her. No one responded.
10. The investigator visited Durham on 17 July. She obtained copies of relevant
extracts from Mr Jordan’s prison and medical records. She spoke to his cellmate.
11. NHS England commissioned an independent clinical reviewer to review Mr Jordan’s
clinical care at the prison. The clinical reviewer and investigator conducted a joint
interview at Durham on 11 September 2024.
12. We informed HM Coroner for County Durham and Darlington of the investigation.
The Coroner gave us the results of the post-mortem examination and the toxicology
report. We have sent the Coroner a copy of this report.
13. The Ombudsman’s office contacted one of Mr Jordan’s sons to explain the
investigation and to ask if he had any matters he wanted us to consider. He said
that on the day he died, Mr Jordan had spoken to them and had said he did not feel
safe and this might have been because a newspaper article contained details of his
conviction and sentence. He had told them he was going to speak to prison officers
about being moved. They wanted to know why he had not been moved. This has
been addressed in the report.
14. We shared our initial report with HMPPS and the prison’s healthcare provider,
Spectrum CIC. They found no factual inaccuracies.
15. We sent a copy of our initial report to one of Mr Jordan’s sons. He did not notify us
of any factual inaccuracies.
2 Prisons and Probation Ombudsman
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Background Information
HMP Durham
16. HMP Durham is a local prison, serving the courts of Tyneside, Durham and
Cumbria. Spectrum Community Health CIC provides primary healthcare services.
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys Foundation NHS Trust provides mental health
services.
HM Inspectorate of Prisons
17. The most recent inspection of Durham was in November 2021. Inspectors reported
that new arrivals had the opportunity to discuss their concerns but late admissions
and a busy first night centre sometimes impacted on the quality of the service
provided. Recorded levels of self-harm were lower than at similar prisons, and there
was good interrogation of self-harm data. Prisoners’ healthcare was affected by
serious staff shortages in the department.
Independent Monitoring Board
18. Each prison has an Independent Monitoring Board (IMB) of unpaid volunteers from
the local community who help to ensure that prisoners are treated fairly and
decently. In its latest annual report, for the year to 31 October 2023, the IMB
reported that the prison generally felt a safe environment. However, the Board
raised concerns about the level of overcrowding which had led to the
accommodation of vulnerable prisoners in the main body of the prison.
Previous deaths at HMP Durham
19. Mr Jordan was the 13th prisoner to die at Durham since July 2021. Of the previous
deaths, five were self-inflicted and seven were from natural causes. There was
another self-inflicted death at Durham the day after Mr Jordan’s, but they were
unconnected with no similarities.
Prisons and Probation Ombudsman 3
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Key Events
20. On 10 April 2024, Mr Brian Jordan was remanded in custody on historic sexual
offences charges. The next day, he attended court and was released.
21. On 14 June, Mr Jordan was again remanded in custody on sexual offences charges
and sent to HMP Durham. Mr Jordan had no known history of suicide or self-harm
and no risk factors. He told the reception nurse that he had no thoughts of suicide
or self-harm and he declined the offer to be seen by the mental health team.
22. Mr Jordan was allocated a shared cell on the Vulnerable Prisoners (VP) section of F
Wing (the induction wing for new arrivals) due to the nature of his offence. (There is
no evidence that Mr Jordan and his cellmate were close or had shared personal
information.)
23. On 27 June, Mr Jordan appeared in court by video link. He was convicted of sexual
offences and sentenced to seven years and seven months in prison. A healthcare
support worker completed a review of Mr Jordan after his change in status and no
concerns were noted.
24. Over the following days, staff had no concerns about Mr Jordan’s risk of suicide and
self-harm and he raised no issues with them.
Events of 3 July 2024
25. The investigator watched CCTV footage, body worn video camera (BWVC) footage
and listened to the staff radio communications and 999 call from 3 July. She also
obtained information from the North East Ambulance Service.
26. At around 8.30am, Mr Jordan’s cellmate left the cell to go to his English lesson. He
was due back between 11.15am and 11.30am.
27. CCTV shows that no one entered Mr Jordan’s cell after his cellmate left. At 9.27am,
Mr Jordan rang one of his sons from his in-cell phone. All calls are recorded and the
investigator listened to the call.
28. Mr Jordan asked his son to check online for the offence details of his cellmate. His
son told him that there was no information about his cellmate online in the local
press but that details of his offence and conviction had been reported. Mr Jordan
asked his son to read out the article. As his son did so, Mr Jordan became
distressed. He repeatedly said he was scared he would be attacked by other
prisoners. He said he felt sick and that he had a shoelace. He asked his son to go
and buy a copy of the local newspaper and he would ring back later. He was
anxious about whether he would be able to ring back as it was likely to be after
11.00am (presumably this was because he knew his cellmate was due to return to
the cell). Mr Jordan’s son told him if he felt unsafe he should request a prison move.
29. During the telephone call recording, in the background an officer can be heard
coming to the cell and asking Mr Jordan if he wanted to go for exercise. Mr Jordan
refused and remained on the telephone call. This was at approximately 9.40am.
The telephone call lasted for 15 minutes and 47 seconds and ended at 9.42am.
4 Prisons and Probation Ombudsman
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
30. At 10.43am, Officer A unlocked Mr Jordan’s cell to ask him if he wanted to come out
for association time. In her written statement, she said she opened the door and
saw Mr Jordan slumped on the floor at the foot of the bunkbeds with a ligature
around his neck, tied to the top bunk. She radioed a Code Blue (a medical
emergency code used when a prisoner is unconscious that alerts other staff and
tells the control room to call an ambulance immediately) and then shouted to her
colleagues for assistance. She entered the cell and cut the ligature attached to the
bunkbeds. Staff in the control room immediately telephoned for an ambulance.
31. In her written statement, Officer B said that she heard Officer A’s emergency radio
call and her shout for staff. She ran to the cell and saw that Mr Jordan had what
appeared to be a black shoelace around his neck as Officer A had already cut the
ligature from the bunk bed. She took the knife from Officer A and cut the lace from
around Mr Jordan’s neck.
32. Officer A began CPR, followed by Officer B until the nurse arrived. The nurse asked
the staff to move Mr Jordan out onto the landing as there was more room. Officer B
continued with CPR. Officer C then relieved Officer B and he continued with CPR.
33. At interview the nurse said she heard the emergency radio call and ran to the wing.
When she arrived at the cell, Mr Jordan was already on the landing and staff were
giving CPR. She used a suction device to clear the secretions in his mouth and
applied the defibrillator pads.
34. Ambulance service records show that the prison made the call at 10.43am.
Ambulance paramedics arrived at 10.48am and assisted with the resuscitation
attempts. The paramedics declared Mr Jordan dead at 11.58am.
35. Mr Jordan was scheduled to transfer to HMP Northumberland on 5 July to complete
his sentence and access relevant offending behaviour programmes. He did not
know this.
Contact with Mr Jordan’s family
36. The prison appointed two family liaison officers. They visited Mr Jordan’s family
home at approximately 3.15pm on 3 July and broke the news to his sons that their
father had died.
37. The prison contributed to the cost of Mr Jordan’s funeral, in line with national
guidelines.
Support for prisoners and staff
38. Postvention is a joint HMPPS and Samaritans initiative that aims to ensure a
consistent approach to providing staff and prisoners support following all deaths in
custody. Postvention procedures should be initiated immediately after every self-
inflicted death and on a case by case basis after all other types of death. Key
elements of postvention care include a hot debrief for staff involved in the
emergency response and engaging Listeners (prisoners trained by the Samaritans
to provide confidential peer-support) to identify prisoners most affected by the
death.
Prisons and Probation Ombudsman 5
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
39. After Mr Jordan’s death, the duty governor debriefed the prison and healthcare staff
involved in the emergency response to ensure they had the opportunity to discuss
any issues arising, and to offer support. The staff care team also offered support.
Listeners were sent to the wing to offer support to prisoners.
40. The prison posted notices informing other prisoners of Mr Jordan’s death, and
offering support. Staff reviewed all prisoners assessed as being at risk of suicide or
self-harm in case they had been adversely affected by Mr Jordan’s death.
Post-mortem report
41. The post-mortem report concluded that Mr Jordan died from pressure to the neck
caused by hanging.
42. The toxicology report noted that at some point Mr Jordan had used cannabis.
However, it was unlikely that he was under the influence of this drug at the time of
death.
6 Prisons and Probation Ombudsman
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Findings
Assessment of risk
43. Prison Service Instruction (PSI) 64/2011, Management of prisoners at risk of harm
to self, to others and from others (Safer Custody), sets out the procedures (known
as ACCT) that staff must follow if they identify that a prisoner is at risk of suicide or
self-harm.
44. Mr Jordan had no risk factors for suicide or self-harm, other than that he had not
been in prison for very long. During his three weeks at Durham, Mr Jordan shared
no concerns with staff and expressed no thoughts of suicide or self-harm.
45. It would appear finding out that details of his offence were in the local press was the
trigger for Mr Jordan’s actions. However, staff would have been unaware of the
contents of the telephone call Mr Jordan had with his son on the morning of 3 July.
Mr Jordan raised no concerns with staff or his cellmate. We are satisfied that staff
could not have foreseen his actions.
Clinical care
46. The clinical reviewer concluded that the emergency response was good.
47. The clinical reviewer made three recommendations about aspects of Mr
Jordan’s physical healthcare which are not relevant to his death but which the
Head of Healthcare will wish to address.
Inquest
48. At the inquest, held from 9 to 11 September 2025, the jury concluded that Mr
Jordan died by suicide.
Prisons and Probation Ombudsman 7
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Third Floor, 10 South Colonnade Email: mail@ppo.gov.uk T l 020 7633 4100
Canary Wharf, London E14 4PU Web: www.ppo.gov.uk
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

Case Details

Date of Death 3 July 2024
Report Published 19 September 2025
Age 51-60
Gender
Responsible Body HMP Durham
Recommendations
0
Inquest Date 11 September 2025

Documents