PPO Fatal Incident
Individual at Swaleside
Natural causes
Report published
HMP Swaleside (Prison)
Recommendations
No specific recommendations were made in this investigation report.
Full Report Text
Investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death of a man in August 2005, while a prisoner at HMP Swaleside Prisons and Probation Ombudsman for England and Wales February 2006 This is a report into the circumstances of the death of an 83 year old man, was found collapsed on the floor of his cell in the Healthcare Centre of HMP Swaleside. He was taken to hospital and died some hours later. My colleagues and I would like to extend our condolences to the man’s family and friends. I would also like to thank the Governor of Swaleside and his staff for their co- operation with this investigation. The investigation was carried out on my behalf of one of my colleagues. Swale Primary Care Trust, the health care provider, was notified of this death and a clinical review was requested. We await the reviewer’s report, but I have judged there would be no merit in delaying this report further on that account. In many ways, this is amongst the most straightforward reports I have issued since taking responsibility for the investigation of all deaths in custody nearly two years ago. However, the absence of a clinical review is part of a wider problem that requires the continued attention of Prison Health and other colleagues in the Department of Health. Stephen Shaw CBE Prisons and Probation Ombudsman February 2006 2 Contents Summary Investigative Process Background (i) HMP Swaleside Time in custody from 1998-2005 (i) Blakenhurst 1998-2005 (ii) Swaleside 2001-2005 (iii) January to August 2005 Events of 7 August 2005 Post Mortem and Clinical Review Conclusions and Recommendation 3 Summary At the age of 78 this man was sentenced to life imprisonment on 16 November 1999 for the murder of his former wife. He suffered ill health from the time he entered custody on remand a year earlier. He had respiratory problems and severe chronic bronchitis as well as difficulties with mobility and back pain. His health problems meant that he spent the vast majority of his sentence in prison Healthcare Centres. He lived a socially isolated life as it appears he was unfriendly and would frequently swear at other prisoners and staff. He passed his time by lying in bed and resisted attempts to encourage him to leave his room. Attempts by Healthcare staff to conduct clinical tests and medical investigations of his ailments were often rebuffed, but his Care Plan was regularly monitored. He did not co-operate with Life Sentence Plan Boards. The health of this man gradually deteriorated, but the day before his death he refused to see a doctor or have antibiotics. On the day he died, he remained in bed and did not eat any meals although he had a dietary supplement drink. He told a nurse who walked past his room at 3:15pm that he was okay. When she saw him twenty minutes later, he was face down on the floor and unconscious but breathing. He was taken to hospital by ambulance, but died later that evening without regaining consciousness. A post mortem was performed on 11 August. The cause of death was given as bronchopneumonia due to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The family of this man has not expressed any concerns about the care he received while in custody. 4 Investigative Process The Senior Investigator visited Swaleside on 11 August 2005. She was given access to the man’s prison records including his medical records. My investigator met with the appointed Liaison Governor, and offered to meet representatives from the Independent Monitoring Board and the Prison Officers’ Association to give them the opportunity to raise relevant issues. She also visited the cell where this man was located and spoke to healthcare staff who knew him. Notices to staff and prisoners were displayed around the prison. No responses were received from staff or prisoners. One of the man’s sons was contacted by my Family Liaison Officer to offer him the opportunity to contribute towards the investigation process. He did not have any issues he wished to raise concerning the care his father received. A clinical review of the healthcare given to the man whilst he was in custody was requested on 18 August 2005. It has not yet been received. 5 Background (i) HMP Swaleside Swaleside is a medium security prison in Kent which holds 775 prisoners who are serving sentences of four years or over. It accepts prisoners in the first stage of a life sentence who do not need the highest conditions of security. The Healthcare Centre has capacity for 14 prisoners in ten single rooms and a four-bed ward. It is staffed by a Healthcare Principal Officer, two Healthcare Senior Officers, three Healthcare Officers, one F grade nurse and one E grade nurse. The Healthcare Centre also provides in-patient facilities for HMP Maidstone. 6 Time in custody from 1998- 2004 (i) Blakenhurst 1998-2001 This man came into custody on 3 November 1998 and was sent initially to HMP Blakenhurst. He was seen by a healthcare worker on reception and a First Reception Health Screen form was completed to find out his medical history. He said that he was using medication for asthma and that he had worries about his breathing. He had been discharged that morning as an in- patient in a local hospital due to a chest infection and possible left heart failure. On induction, the man was identified as having mobility and vision impairments although these were not specified. He was readmitted to the hospital the next day when his condition appeared to worsen, but was discharged the same day. In a letter dated 27 May 1999 to the man’s solicitor, the Senior Medical Officer at Blakenhurst described the man’s health in the following terms: “His physical health has remained poor. He has a chronic cough and wheeze. He is breathless on exertion and spends most of his time in bed. Mentally, he is irritable but shows no sign of functional or organic mental illness. He continues to smoke heavily, so that there is little likelihood of his chest condition improving and every probability that it will continue to deteriorate … his health is likely to gradually deteriorate over a period of months or years, although in the presence of a history of heart disease, he could also rapidly deteriorate rapidly and without warning.” In November 1999, this man was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of his former wife. His tariff was 12 years. On 21 December 2000, the Senior Medical Officer at Blakenhurst wrote to the Prison Service’s Lifer Unit who were looking for a suitable prison to place the man. “His acute respiratory problems quickly settled to reveal that he suffered from quite severe chronic bronchitis and was subject to attacks of disabling breathlessness for which oxygen therapy was, at times, required … His mobility, from the time he entered prison in November 1998 … was always apparently poor. He walked with the help of walking sticks and soon became breathless … [His lumbar back pain] recurred with a vengeance when he injured his back … which is reported to have occurred when he tried to assault another inmate and fell over in the process. Attempts to fully assess his injuries failed when he refused to have an x-ray. “ … He is stubborn, unfriendly, verbally abusive at times, unwilling to co- operate with attempts to investigate and treat his known ailments … 7 Despite the best efforts of health care staff, this man will not be motivated to try and help himself … [He] will require regular medical and nursing supervision, if for no other reason than to try and ensure that, despite his non co-operation, on which you can depend, he does not succumb to conditions which result from a combination of his advanced age, his chronic chest problems and his almost complete immobility.” (ii) Swaleside 2001-2005 The man moved to Swaleside on 26 April 2001. He was seen by a doctor the next day who noted in his medical record that he was suffering from chronic respiratory problems. However, as he was “very bad tempered”, it was difficult to get much information from him. Arrangements were made for various blood tests to be taken, but he declined to have his blood taken. A Life Sentence Plan Board was held on 18 July 2001 concerning the man’s progress. He was not co-operative and the Board was terminated. The man’s life sentence was reviewed on 28 January 2002. It was recorded that no targets were set for him to achieve as he would not participate in any activity offered to him. His personal officer concluded in a lifer report dated 7 March 2003: “[this man] has some medical problems that restrict his location and movement but all nursing staff and doctors who have had dealings with him are in agreement that his mobility and ability to self care are far greater than he would have anyone believe. His medical condition though serious is exacerbated by his frequent refusal of medication and neglect of personal care and hygiene.” A medical assessment by a doctor was due on 26 June 2003 as part of his life sentence reports, but he refused to allow the doctor to do so. His medical record details much of the man’s day-to-day life for the last four years of his life. Swaleside commenced a Physical Needs Care Plan on 17 February 2003 when it was clear that, due to poor hygiene, his bedding, clothing and room were not being kept clean. He was described as being verbally abusive to staff and prisoners, racist, aggressive, intolerant, sometimes refusing to take medication or consent to medical tests. Whilst he would collect his meals sometimes, at other times he was unwilling even to get out of bed. He continued to suffer from poor health including degenerative spinal disease, back pain, chest pain and respiratory illness. Apart from one week spent on a residential unit, the rest of his time was spent in the Healthcare Centre. 8 (iii) January to August 2005 On 7 January 2005, a referral was made for this man to be considered for HMP Norwich’s older persons lifer unit. His Mental Health Needs Plan and medical record detail his daily life in that his behaviour remained unchanged, but he had agreed to use a Zimmer frame and had become more mobile. On 20 May, it was noted that he was suffering from low back pain but was refusing an x-ray and all forms of medication. A lumbar support was ordered. It arrived on 24 May but was too small and he did not want another one to be provided. On 25 May the man’s breathing was observed to have improved since walking upright with a frame rather than being in a wheelchair. On 6 June he was given Feldene gel for back ache. On 11 July, he was seen by an in-reach mental health care worker but no symptoms of mental health problems were detected. As he was verbally aggressive and appeared unwilling to participate, no further action was taken. On 5 August the man had a shower after being doubly incontinent during the night. On 6 August, it was noted in his medical record, “feels unwell, cough and expectoration, refuses to have his temp checked. Chest - basal creps. Amoxycillin. Refuses antibiotics.” His health was noted to have been poor that day, but he refused to see a doctor. 9 Events of 7 August 2005 On 7 August, the day of his death, it was noted in the man’s Care Plan Evaluation at 2:00pm that he had remained in bed all morning and had not eaten breakfast or lunch. He had not been locked in his room except for the patrol period at lunchtime. A staff nurse told my investigator that she had offered the man a drink of Fortisip supplement earlier in the day, which he had taken. He was later offered a Complan drink, but declined it. The staff nurse walked past his room at about 3:15pm and saw him lying in bed. She had asked him if he was okay and he said he was. At 3:35pm, she saw him face down on the floor. She was unable to rouse him. With the help of a Healthcare Officer the man was lifted onto his bed, and the staff nurse telephoned the Healthcare Senior Officer (HCSO) who was in an office upstairs. The HCSO told my investigator that he went downstairs immediately and saw that the man was breathing, but unconscious. He looked as though he might have had a stroke as one side of his face seemed to have slumped. The man then regained consciousness, but was breathing with difficulty. The HCSO conducted a set of clinical observations on the man which took a couple of minutes. His blood pressure was 100/60. The HCSO could not recall exactly, but thought that he had asked another member of staff to contact the Principal Officer in charge of responding to incidents to ask for an emergency ambulance to be sent. Kent Ambulance NHS Trust have confirmed that they received a request for an ambulance from Swaleside at 3:46pm. An ambulance was despatched at 3:48pm and arrived at the prison at 3:59pm. It left the prison at 4:30pm and arrived at hospital at 5:16pm. The man’s death, from severe pneumonia, was confirmed by the hospital at 10:05pm on 7 August. The police were asked to trace any family as the man had not provided Swaleside with next of kin details. The man’s son, was contacted and told of his father’s death. In compliance with its contingency plans relating to the deaths of prisoners, HMP Swaleside notified the Coroner, the IMB and other official parties of the death. My investigator visited Swaleside on 11 August and asked several staff about life in the Healthcare Centre. The HCSO told my investigator that the man had been suffering from a chest infection the week before his death, but did not want antibiotics so the medication was not ordered. The man had been prone to chest infections but his deterioration had seemed sudden. 10 My investigator asked staff to describe a typical day. She was told that he would just stay in bed, smoke and read a newspaper. He would not take exercise outside and always bought ½ oz tobacco, a packet of cigarette papers and a packet of toffees once a week. 11 Post Mortem and Clinical Review A post mortem examination of the man took place on 11 August. It concluded that the cause of death was bronchopneumonia due to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A clinical review of the man’s healthcare whilst in custody was requested from Swale Primary Care Trust on 18 August 2005. I am disappointed that I have been unable to include its findings in this report, as I have not yet received a copy of the review. As in a number of cases, I have judged there to be no benefit in delaying my report further. To do so, would not be advantageous to the family, the Prison Service or the Coroner. Nor would it be respectful to the man’s memory. However, the absence or late delivery of a clinical review is part of a wider problem that I have encountered in far too many of my office’s investigations. 12 Conclusions and Recommendation This man suffered from ill health from the time he entered custody in 1998. He was an elderly man who smoked and did not engage well with medical staff. More detailed comment on the quality of healthcare he received in custody is a matter for the Primary Care Trust, whose review has not yet been received. I recommend that a copy of this report is sent to the Head of Prison Health, drawing his attention to my comments on p.12. 13 14
Case Details
Recommendations
0