Source · Investigations in the NHS

*Mental health homicide investigation legacy report into the care and treatment of Mr P: November 2013

South East Published 01 Nov 2013 Trust Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Subject Mr P

Index summary

This is the mental health homicide investigation report into the care and treatment of Mr P . Note: NHS England’s south region has published a mental health homicide legacy report. This was commissioned by the former strategic health authority, but not published before that organisation was abolished on 31 March 2013.

Recommendations

7 total
L1 Addressed to: The trust No Response Published

Link to recommendation L1

Recommendation · source text
The trust should continue to ensure, through personal development plans and supervision, that all staff in direct contact with patients receive training in the assessment, planning and management of risk. The trust should ensure that staff receive risk assessment training and are declared competent before conducting any risk assessments. Compliance should be audited no less than every three months by the clinical governance team. Findings should then be reported to the trust board at appropriate times, as defined by the trust’s governance processes.
L2 Addressed to: The trust No Response Published

Link to recommendation L2

Recommendation · source text
The trust should assure itself that the current process for Care Programme Approach (including care planning, risk assessment, risk management planning) is robust. The clinical governance team should audit compliance at least every six months and report its findings to the board.
L3 Addressed to: The trust No Response Published

Link to recommendation L3

Recommendation · source text
The trust should ensure that all staff adhere to the trust’s policy and procedure for managing formal and informal service users’ non-compliance with treatment and managing DNA (did not attend) or cancelled appointments.
L4 Addressed to: The trust No Response Published

Link to recommendation L4

Recommendation · source text
The trust should continue to develop relationships with partnership agencies. This should include reviewing the protocols with partnership agencies to ensure effective communication and information sharing for the safety of patients and the general public e.g. information to service providers such as housing associations and hostels. This should take place within the next three months.
L5 Addressed to: The trust No Response Published

Link to recommendation L5

Recommendation · source text
The trust should continue to encourage risk panel meetings. In circumstances where there is significant uncertainty about an individual patient’s diagnosis and/or treatment plan, these cases should automatically be discussed in an appropriate forum, with other clinical colleagues, to assist in developing an appropriate care and risk management plan.
L6 Addressed to: The trust No Response Published

Link to recommendation L6

Recommendation · source text
The trust should monitor and review the newly-developed personality disorder initiatives to ensure that all staff, medical and otherwise, are aware of what personality disorder services are available, how to refer, and the waiting time for referral. This should include knowledge of the referral process and criteria for referring service users to the personality disorder service for assessment.
L7 Addressed to: The trust No Response Published

Link to recommendation L7

Recommendation · source text
Point 4 of the trust’s action plan states that the trust has delivered Historical, Clinical, Risk Management – 20 (HCR-20)training in response to the need to ensure that formalised risk assessment and management processes, including assessment of longitudinal risk over longer time periods, are in place and effectively used. However, HCR-20 is one tool for assessing risk and the trust needs to ensure that robust mechanisms are in place to support the actual management of risk.

Acceptance status

Per recommendation
No Response Published
7

Total recommendations
7
About this data

Acceptance status records the published response to each recommendation. Acceptance does not establish that an action has been completed.

Independent health investigation reports and reviews commissioned by government or NHS England.

About this investigation

Source & metadata

Independent investigation report. Recommendations and any published response are extracted below.