Source · Investigations in the NHS

Independent investigation: Simon Breed, Wood Green (2004)

London Incident 15 Apr 2004 Subject Simon Breed

Mentally ill man repeatedly and fatally stabbed neighbour. Ind Inq 2010

Acceptance status

Per recommendation
No Response Published
20

Total recommendations
20
About this data

Acceptance status tracks whether the trust accepted or responded to each recommendation.

Independent health investigation reports and reviews commissioned by government or NHS England.

About this investigation

Source & metadata

Independent investigation report. Recommendations and any published response are extracted below.

Recommendations

20 total
R1 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
The current system of offering outpatient appointments should be thoroughly scrutinised through audit. Appointments should be made and letters of confirmation should be sent to all patients offered outpatient appointments.
R10 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
The trust reviews the management and organisation of all SUI reviews and board level inquiries to ensure adequate provision of time and appropriate staffing. This review process should consider how the trust can best learn from the reviews and implement … Read more
R11 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
Until a fully integrated electronic information system is available protocols should be developed to provide guidance as to the documentation that should be reviewed in all CPA cases at the time of allocation, review, transfer and closure.
R12 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
The 2008 CPA policy is reviewed and amended to take into account the problems that we have identified in the PT case and to ensure that policy is compatible with all other relevant trust policies and protocols.
R13 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
To further evaluate the operation of the CPA the trust should consider the development of: a. A rolling programme of inpatient and community team inspections to assess the quality of risk assessments and risk management plans. Results should be fed … Read more
R14 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
If a person previously unknown to mental health services is admitted to the PICU and then leaves the unit and immediately returns to the community without being allocated a care coordinator this should be treated as a SUI.
R15 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
A system to allow managerial oversight of referrals to community teams is developed, which will not introduce a delay in such referrals being considered by the team, but will ensure consistency in the adequacy of information available.
R16 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
There should be a target time for all new referrals of previously unknown patients from inpatient settings to START.
R17 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
A care coordinator should be allocated within five days of receipt of referral unless there is a disagreement about the patient’s CPA eligibility. If there is disagreement that disagreement must be resolved by nominated management staff within a defined short … Read more
R18 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
Where the patient is receiving inpatient treatment, and prior to referral to the START team and allocation of a care coordinator, the CPA responsibility of the named (or primary) nurse must be clarified.
R19 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
CPA audit processes should include an evaluation of the frequency of carers assessments offered and provided in relation to the number of carers entitled.
R2 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
The current trust non-attendance policy should be critically reviewed in the light of our findings. The trust should ensure that, where necessary, it is strengthened to ensure non-attendance is discussed with a named senior clinician and that nominated individuals are … Read more
R20 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
The 2008 CPA policy is revised to include a requirement that a comprehensive risk assessment is undertaken by the care coordinator prior to the decision to close the case of any person subject to CPA.
R3 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
The trust should establish a database (or modify existing databases) of all patients who are entitled to section 117 MHA aftercare. The database should contain or link with details of CPA aftercare plans as well as risk assessment and risk … Read more
R4 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
The trust work with the Metropolitan Police Service and the Crown Prosecution Service to develop protocols to facilitate senior clinical input into decisions to grant bail and decisions to withdraw criminal charges in cases involving mentally disordered offenders. Read more
R5 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
Following consultation with M5 the recommendations contained in his SUI investigation management report are updated, reviewed and added to any action plan that follows our investigation.
R6 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
JSIG should be involved in implementing the action plan stemming from the recommendations contained in this report.
R7 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
The trust reviews its SUI policy to ensure that the loss of any patient’s health records is treated as an SUI.
R8 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
The trust immediately reviews the way in which all records (both electronic and paper) are secured following the occurrence of any serious incident to ensure there is no recurrence of the loss of vital clinical information.
R9 The trust No Response Published
Recommendation
Prior to establishing a board level inquiry the trust should always take into account the likelihood of an independent investigation taking place under the terms of HSG(94)27 and should review the scope of the SUI policy accordingly.