Source · Investigations in the NHS

Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust- Invited Review of Radiology Services 5-6 October 2021

South West Published 01 Jan 2021 Trust Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Recommendations

36 total
Addressed to: Senior and Executive management No Response Published

Link to recommendation 1

Recommendation · source text
Senior and Executive management should consider with the Chief of Service how to best provide consistent and visible support whilst enabling the Specialty Director, General , and senior radiographers to develop their roles and leadership of the department, so that the voice of practitioners is clear and staff can see their place within the overall trust strategy (4.1.4)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 2

Recommendation · source text
Develop a programme of team building and clarify roles among the department management team so decision making is rapid and clear to all in the department.(4.1.10)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 3

Recommendation · source text
Offer appropriate development, coaching and support for the General Manager and Specialty Director so they are clear about their responsibilities and how to escalate problems. . (4.1.10)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 4

Recommendation · source text
Prioritise seeking a permanent Radiology Service Manager, perhaps using alternative or creative approaches. (4.1.10)
Addressed to: The leadership team No Response Published

Link to recommendation 5

Recommendation · source text
The leadership team need to create and communicate a vision and plan articulating specifically what the aims are over the next 5 years, including milestones that the workforce understands and supports. This could be facilitated by the trust organisational development team involving all staff groups to discern their ideas and aspirations and generate enthusiasm and ownership of their future. (4.1.12)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 6

Recommendation · source text
Consider the Quality Standard for Imaging and working towards it. (4.1.12)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 7

Recommendation · source text
Clarify the arrangements for Retire and Return and other flexible working options for experienced consultants to make the option financially viable(4.1.17)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 8

Recommendation · source text
Ensure there is a robust and documented programme of induction and mandatory training job-planned for all new staff whether or not they have previously worked at the Trust. This must include the requirements of IR(ME)R 17. (4.1.17)
Addressed to: departmental managers No Response Published

Link to recommendation 9

Recommendation · source text
Allow the departmental managers to over recruit to the establishment at times of the year when radiographers are available in quantities, typically at the time of band 5 graduation. (4.1.17)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 10

Recommendation · source text
Review the departmental processes and systems involving the modality leads to ensure the processes and systems are working effectively (4.1.19)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 11

Recommendation · source text
Check and resolve contractual maintenance obligations to the Cobalt centre
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 13

Recommendation · source text
Ensure that the lack of pre-fetch on PACS is represented on the trust wide risk register. (4.2.5)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 14

Recommendation · source text
Develop, with the radiologists, suitably designed reporting rooms drawing on national guidance and local preference. Ensure there are suitable reporting facilities for complex work. (4.2.5)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 15

Recommendation · source text
Urgently redesign the Home Reporting offer with consultant involvement for all consultants and reporting radiographers who wish to participate. (4.2.5)
Addressed to: trust No Response Published

Link to recommendation 16

Recommendation · source text
It should become an integral part of trust sign-off of any new service or new consultant business case that the implications and true costs of the required radiology capacity are included. (4.2.7)
Addressed to: The service No Response Published

Link to recommendation 17

Recommendation · source text
The service should undertake a complete workforce establishment review in regard to the workforce capacity needed to provide the required activity and out of hours service provision. This must include development of advanced radiographer roles and those currently in AP roles must have job plans agreed. The Trust must ensure that it has an effective out of hours service where sufficient staff are available and supported to deliver care. (4.2.14)
Addressed to: The trust No Response Published

Link to recommendation 18

Recommendation · source text
The trust must recruit more radiologists to meet current and planned demand in the short and medium term. The Trust could consider the global radiologist route (4.2.14)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 19

Recommendation · source text
Consider co-location of the booking team and a review of processes to maximize the efficiency of the service. (4.2.20)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 20

Recommendation · source text
Review what items are outsourced. Ensure that a significant proportion of the subspecialty and complex work is kept in-house and prioritise outsourcing plain films based on clinical urgency (4.3.7)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 21

Recommendation · source text
Conduct a systematic review of job plans and rotas, against activity, involving the consultants throughout, to ensure equity and manageability, and that SPAs and commitment to teaching are recognised. There must be a non-voluntary rota of on-call consultants available for the times when there is no other cover in the departments in order that a sustainable and safe level of cover at these times is present. (4.3.16)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 22

Recommendation · source text
Ensure the Risk Register includes progress and completion dates. (4.3.22)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 23

Recommendation · source text
There must be a clear process for induction for new consultants including statutory requirements under employers’ responsibilities. (4.3.19)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 24

Recommendation · source text
Review and standardise pathways of emergency and urgent care including engagement with trauma meetings. (4.3.20)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 25

Recommendation · source text
Formalise arrangements for back-up and cover for the breast and paediatric radiology consultants and prioritise efforts to recruit to these specialisms. (4.4.3)
Addressed to: The service No Response Published

Link to recommendation 26

Recommendation · source text
The service should review the out of hours working arrangements for radiographers with particular reference to those service elements reliant upon single handed on call cover across more than one modality or service. (4.4.4)
Addressed to: The service No Response Published

Link to recommendation 27

Recommendation · source text
The service should review the OOH cover/on call rota to ensure robust consultant cover for the times not covered by the external service.
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 28

Recommendation · source text
Safety huddles and staff meetings should take place regularly so that all staff are fully informed and there is a space for communication to take place. (4.4.5)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 29

Recommendation · source text
All relevant staff should be included within the REALM process as set out in the RCR guidance. (4.4.6)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 30

Recommendation · source text
Develop a departmental process which would allow electronic vetting where the consultants could review those cases which the radiographer felt needed a radiologist opinion and mechanisms for liaison with referrers about appropriateness of test requests. (4.4.10)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 31

Recommendation · source text
Ensure that vetting staff have appropriate skills among them to be able to challenge all referrals where required.(4.410)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 32

Recommendation · source text
Consider adopting iRefer to support appropriate referrals. (4.4.10)
Addressed to: The Trust No Response Published

Link to recommendation 33

Recommendation · source text
The Trust should review the alert mechanisms for unexpected findings and cancers, bringing it in line with national guidance. (4.4.12)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 34

Recommendation · source text
Review arrangements for chaperones and ultrasound patient experience in Gloucester, including all waiting and changing areas. (4.5.2)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 35

Recommendation · source text
Ensure there is staffing assigned to monitor patients in the waiting area at Cheltenham. (4.5.3)
No Response Published

Link to recommendation 36

Recommendation · source text
Review the DNA rates in all modalities to determine what action could be taken to reduce them. (4.5.5)

Acceptance status

Per recommendation
No Response Published
36

Total recommendations
36
About this data

Acceptance status records the published response to each recommendation. Acceptance does not establish that an action has been completed.

Independent health investigation reports and reviews commissioned by government or NHS England.

About this investigation

Source & metadata

Independent investigation report. Recommendations and any published response are extracted below.