Source · National Audit Office
Transforming courts and tribunals: a progress update
This report describes progress following the second phase of HMCTS’s reform programme, which ended in January 2019.
Published: 13 Sep 2019
Recommendations: 10
Type: Value for Money
NAO confirmed: 10
Department: Ministry of Justice
Recommendations
HMCTS must maintain a strong grip on progress to maximise the benefits from its substantial investment in reform. HMCTS should strengthen its portfolio and programme monitoring before the end of interim state 3 to provide early warning when things are going off track; be clear about the impact on the critical path; and allow it to take decisive corrective action. Reporting needs to give a more holistic, high-level view of progress towards the next key interim state (or end state) and use a broader range of indicators that integrate both financial and performance information.
Recommendation 2
HMCTS should improve how it measures the benefits of reform, more clearly demonstrating where savings are coming from. We previously recommended that HMCTS should not bank savings before new systems and working practices were fully embedded. There will be more headcount reductions in the next stage of reform, making this more pressing. HMCTS needs to:
Recommendation 3
• provide assurance that headcount reductions are linked to operational improvements;
Recommendation 4
• take account of changes in demand; and
Recommendation 5
• ensure cuts do not come at the expense of service quality.
Recommendation 6
HMCTS should better demonstrate how it is monitoring the impact of its reforms on users of the justice system. It should:
• publish the operational data it uses to monitor the impact of court closures; and
• publish the operational data it uses to monitor the impact of court closures; and
Recommendation 7
• put in place structures to ensure learning about how services are impacting those using them is captured and fed into the development of new services.
Recommendation 8
HMCTS should provide more clarity on how, in practice, it will meet the commitments set out in its Fit for the Future response. Specifically, before considering future closures it should:
• improve transparency of the rationale for future closure proposals;
• improve transparency of the rationale for future closure proposals;
Recommendation 9
• set out what other sources of information it will use to assess ‘access to justice’ alongside travel time; and
Recommendation 10
• provide evidence that reform has reduced demand for physical hearings.
Public Accounts Committee follow-up
The Public Accounts Committee examined this NAO report and published its own recommendations. The government responds to PAC recommendations via Treasury Minutes.