Source · National Audit Office

Responding to sudden-onset humanitarian crises

This report examines FCDO’s response to sudden onset humanitarian crises and whether it is cost effective, as well as future delivery risks.

Published: 12 Jun 2026 Recommendations: 6 Type: Value for Money Department: Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Dept: Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Topics: InternationalInternational aid and development nao.org.uk →

Recommendations

6 items
No response position recorded.

The indexed recommendations do not yet have a recorded response position. This is separate from evidence of implementation. This report was published 12 June 2026.

Recommendation 1

Addressee: Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office · Source location: Page 12, paragraph 20, point a

FCDO should complete a strategic assessment of the resources it needs to deliver rapid, effective humanitarian responses under reduced ODA budgets. This should identify which capabilities should be prioritised for funding and set out how FCDO?s organisational transformation is expected to affect capacity and effectiveness, particularly across the overseas network.

Response position: No response position recorded

Delivery: No implementation status recorded

Recommendation 2

Addressee: Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office · Source location: Page 12, paragraph 20, point b

FCDO should strengthen how it communicates its offer and training for overseas posts, ensuring that posts clearly understand the capabilities available to them through HCRD and how to access the support effectively. FCDO should ensure it has arrangements to assure itself that posts understand and apply this offer and training.

Response position: No response position recorded

Delivery: No implementation status recorded

Recommendation 3

Addressee: Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office · Source location: Page 12, paragraph 20, point c

FCDO should prioritise its own preparedness activities and building the resilience of affected countries in high-risk geographies to respond to crises. It should track progress in these geographies against stated objectives for preparedness and resilience.

Response position: No response position recorded

Delivery: No implementation status recorded

Recommendation 4

Addressee: Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office · Source location: Page 12, paragraph 20, point d

FCDO should define and monitor a set of central performance indicators for sudden-onset humanitarian crisis response, covering speed, quality, capability deployment and results. It should require these metrics to be applied consistently across humanitarian crisis responses, by a combination of HCRD, geographic regions and posts ? depending on responsibilities for responding to each crisis.

Response position: No response position recorded

Delivery: No implementation status recorded

Recommendation 5

Addressee: Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office · Source location: Page 12, paragraph 20, point e

FCDO should explore options for improving the quality, completeness and usability of its cost information for humanitarian crisis response. It should then make practical improvements, enabling it to routinely assess value for money. Better cost information should be used to inform its decisions on the overall size and use of the HCF.

Response position: No response position recorded

Delivery: No implementation status recorded

Recommendation 6

Addressee: Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office · Source location: Page 12, paragraph 20, point f

FCDO should improve how it identifies, disseminates and implements lessons from humanitarian crisis reviews, with an increased focus on the outcomes achieved. The process should involve HCRD, geographic regions, posts and CMD where appropriate. HCRD and CMD should ensure these lessons are used to inform future planning, programme design, guidance, and humanitarian crisis response delivery across FCDO.

Response position: No response position recorded

Delivery: No implementation status recorded