Recommendation 1
IOPC recommendationThe IOPC recommends that Thames Valley Police (TVP) review its training material on handcuffing from prone (subject lying on their front) and the use of ground pin. The review should consider whether training is sufficiently clear regarding:
- How a subject’s arms ought to be restrained during and after the application of handcuffs.
- When it might be necessary and proportionate to elevate a subject’s arms during restraint to the ‘natural point of resistance’ to gain compliance, including when a subject’s arms should be lowered.
- The difficulties in determining another person’s ‘natural point of resistance’. For example, if a subject is in distress, is non-verbal, or intoxicated, then they may not be able to properly communicate, display resistance, or show indicators of pain.
This follows an IOPC investigation where a man was arrested and taken to hospital after swallowing a large quantity of tablets. After being discharged from hospital, he was physically restrained by police officers in the prone position, handcuffed and placed in limb restraints.
During the course of the restraint, the man’s arms, following the application of handcuffs, were pulled at and beyond a 90-degree angle for a prolonged period of time. This resulted in significant injuries to the man’s shoulders. The man appeared distressed but did not verbally communicate with the officers. However, following his death it was established that he sustained a serious injury to his shoulders.
While the TVP training material on the ground pin is clear that elevating a subject’s arms should be done to gain compliance and be removed once this has been achieved, the training material on handcuffing from prone is not as clear. It appears that the matter of how a subject’s arms should be restrained after the application of handcuffs is not currently covered in the training material on handcuffing from prone.
The training material reviewed during our investigation is not clear on when it might be proportionate to use this tactic. Currently, the training only talks about lowering the arms once compliance has been achieved.
Accepted
Thames Valley Police (TVP) use a series of resources to guide Public and Personal Safety Training (PPST) instructors through training content. A timetable provides guidance regarding the order of training days for a particular course, a session plan provides the content to be delivered on any training day, and trainer notes provide the detail of how a technique is to be taught / the method of demonstration.
Trainer notes cover key points to support any depiction in the College of Policing’s Personal Safety Manual of Guidance.
Scenario based training allows for officers to utilise appropriate skills to control varying behaviours in an operational context. Competence is addressed and developed when necessary. This delivery style is in line with the College of Policing’s mandated programme for PPST.
TVP have reviewed the training material associated with handcuffing from a prone position (subject lying on their front). TVP accepts that training may be clarified further and are taking the following actions to ensure necessary change:
How a subject’s arms ought to be restrained during and after the application of handcuffs.
Following review, TVP have made changes to their Handcuffing from Prone Trainer Notes (Strong Side and Support Side) and their Ground Pin Trainer Notes. This provides further clarity on how a subject’s arms are to be restrained during and after the application of handcuffs.
When it might be necessary and proportionate to elevate a subject’s arms during restraint to the ‘natural point of resistance’ to gain compliance, including when a subject’s arms should be lowered.
Following review, TVP have made changes to their Handcuffing from Prone Trainer Notes (Strong Side and Support Side) and their Ground Pin Trainer Notes. This provides further clarity on how a subject’s arms are to be restrained during and after the application of handcuffs.
This includes the method in which the arms are elevated prior to the application of handcuffs, how each arm is managed during application, and what position they are placed in after the handcuffs have been applied.
TVP’s trainer notes do not reference elevating arms to gain compliance. This is done to gain (mechanical) control (this is without the use of handcuffs). This material review is centred on handcuffing from prone. TVP do not teach the elevation or lowering of arms whilst handcuffed to achieve compliance or control.
The difficulties in determining another person’s ‘natural point of resistance’. For example, if a subject is in distress, is non-verbal, or intoxicated, then they may not be able to properly communicate, display resistance, or show indicators of pain.
Following review, TVP have made changes to their Handcuffing from Prone Trainer Notes (Strong Side and Support Side) and their Ground Pin Trainer Notes. This provides further clarity on the difficulty in determining another person’s natural point of resistance / tension. Specifically, the following teaching point has been added:
‘It may be difficult to determine another person’s natural point of tension, for example if they are in distress, non-verbal or intoxicated. These subjects may not be able to properly communicate, display resistance or show indicators of pain’.
TVP’s trainer notes provide more detail than the College of Policing Personal Safety Manual of Guidance. This is to support instructors’ understanding of techniques and how they should be taught. Minimal requirement would be to refer to the illustrations and brief descriptions in the personal safety manual. TVP go ‘over and above’ national requirement to ensure diligence and support to their training team.