Recommendation 1
IOPC recommendationNational recommendation
The College of Policing should review the guidance on head injuries in Authorised Professional Practice (APP) to:
- provide greater clarity on what constitutes a head injury, including the difference between a traumatic brain injury, other serious injury to the head and a superficial injury to the head or face
- ensure that officers are provided with clear guidance on how to recognise and respond to each type of actual or suspected injury
- ensure that it refers to the latest version of any other guidance cited (including guidance issued by the Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine)
- ensure that any other guidance cited does not conflict with guidance given in the other sections of the APP Any change to APP should not increase the risk to those who might have suffered an injury from not being provided with appropriate medical care.
This follows a case where a man appeared to sustain an injury to his nose after being taken to the ground by police officers. The officers believed the man had suffered a head injury, which according to APP requires a detainee to be taken to hospital immediately. The officers called an ambulance to meet them at the police custody suite. However, the man was seen in the custody suite by a Health Care Professional, who assessed him as having a facial injury and decided that the man did not need an ambulance. The man became unwell 24 hours into his detention and was then taken to hospital for a head injury assessment, where it was determined that he had a possible fracture to his nose. Our investigation found that there had been some confusion about whether the man’s injury should be classified as a head injury. We also identified that the APP signposted officers to other guidance that was not the most recent version and that gave slightly different advice to that given in the APP itself.
Do you accept the recommendation?
N/A