Independent review

Building Control Independent Panel report

21 recommendations · government responded 20 May 2026

Chaired by Dame Judith Hackitt · Published 20 May 2026 · Commissioned by MHCLG

Government response

The government responded to the review on 20 May 2026.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government agrees with the Panel's assessment of the current system and accepts its five principles, and commits to further analysis of the recommendations and, "where required", consultation before fuller proposals.

  • The government accepts the Panel's five principles as "the foundation for strengthening the building control system", and says future reform must be "carefully phased and sequenced in partnership with the sector".
  • On the longer-term recommendations, including removing client selection of regulator and creating fewer, larger, publicly accountable bodies, the response sets out an initial approach only, ahead of "fuller proposals and detailed implementation options".
  • On funding, it has invested £55m over three years to build capacity, and, following consultation, "intends" to introduce revised charging regulations enabling full cost recovery across a wider range of activities.
  • It will "shortly publish" a Digital Building Control Roadmap and will fund pathfinder areas with £5 million of the £55 million, with further details "later this year".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

About this review

Summary written by this site
Independent panel chaired by Dame Judith Hackitt, established by MHCLG in April 2025 to examine the building control system in England, addressing Grenfell Tower Inquiry recommendations 22 and 23 regarding the removal of commercial interest from building control. The panel found the current system characterised by fragmentation, conflicting incentives and uneven statutory capacity, and makes 21 recommendations including establishing a single independent statutory building control system and ending dutyholder choice of regulator. The government's same-day response accepted the foundational principles but committed to further analysis and consultation on the most significant structural changes.

Recommendations 21

Show:
Recommendation 1

Response: Accepted in Principle

Addressed to MHCLG / UK Government

Establish a single, independent statutory building control system. Legislate for a unified statutory system for all non HRB work, built on independence, national consistency, clear duties and transparent public accountability.
Government response (the government's words)
The government accepts the panel's five foundational principles for reform and commits to undertaking further analysis of these recommendations and, where required, consulting on the most effective and proportionate way forward.

Link to recommendation 1

Recommendation 2

Response: Accepted in Principle

Addressed to MHCLG / UK Government

Remove dutyholder choice from statutory building control. End client selection of regulator and move to independent allocation model based on risk, competence and capacity. In transition to this, enable preference of BCB to be established.
Government response (the government's words)
The government accepts the panel's five foundational principles for reform and commits to undertaking further analysis of these recommendations and, where required, consulting on the most effective and proportionate way forward.

Link to recommendation 2

Recommendation 3

Response: Accepted in Principle

Addressed to MHCLG / UK Government

Create consolidated Building Control Bodies (BCBs). Establish fewer, larger building control bodies to take on statutory functions from LA BCAs, to deliver consistent decisions, risk-based inspections and enforcement.
Government response (the government's words)
The government accepts the panel's five foundational principles for reform and commits to undertaking further analysis of these recommendations and, where required, consulting on the most effective and proportionate way forward.

Link to recommendation 3

Recommendation 4

Response: Accepted in Principle

Addressed to MHCLG / Building Safety Regulator

Define the role and powers of the Single Construction Regulator (SCR). Set out the SCR's remit across oversight, registration, performance monitoring, HRB decisions and enforcement.
Government response (the government's words)
The government accepts the panel's five foundational principles for reform and commits to undertaking further analysis of these recommendations and, where required, consulting on the most effective and proportionate way forward.

Link to recommendation 4

Recommendation 5

Response: Accepted in Principle

Addressed to MHCLG / Building Safety Regulator

Strengthen national enforcement capability. Provide the SCR with specialist legal, investigatory and technical capacity to support robust and consistent enforcement across England.
Government response (the government's words)
The government accepts the panel's five foundational principles for reform and commits to undertaking further analysis of these recommendations and, where required, consulting on the most effective and proportionate way forward.

Link to recommendation 5

Recommendation 6

Addressed to MHCLG / UK Government

Create one statutory process for applications, notices and approvals. Align requirements across all providers so the statutory function operates to the same clear and modernised rules.

Link to recommendation 6

Recommendation 7

Addressed to MHCLG / UK Government

Consolidate and modernise statutory instruments. Remove contradictions, update outdated provisions and consolidate building regulations to create a coherent framework for all providers.

Link to recommendation 7

Recommendation 8

Addressed to MHCLG

Consider introducing mandated minimum inspections for standard build types. Set nationally agreed inspection points at key stages in construction of a building, so that work receives consistent, risk appropriate oversight.

Link to recommendation 8

Recommendation 9

Addressed to MHCLG / UK Government

Complete reform of the 2010 Fees and Charges Regulations. Enable full cost recovery for all statutory activities and remove outdated constraints on how services fund essential functions.

Link to recommendation 9

Recommendation 10

Addressed to MHCLG / UK Government

Protect building control income. In designing the new model of delivery, ensure income is guaranteed for the long term by ringfencing it to ensure BCBs can deliver their functions effectively.

Link to recommendation 10

Recommendation 11

Addressed to MHCLG / UK Government

Extend compliance and stop notice powers to private sector RBCAs. Give all providers equivalent duties to act in the public interest, while retaining prosecution powers with new BCBs and the SCR.

Link to recommendation 11

Recommendation 12

Addressed to MHCLG / UK Government

Deliver a single national digital building control portal. Create one route for all submissions, workflows and records, enabling consistent processes and real time regulatory visibility.

Link to recommendation 12

Recommendation 13

Addressed to MHCLG / Building Safety Regulator

Establish national data standards and mandatory reporting. Ensure consistent, high-quality data on inspections, compliance, enforcement and outcomes across all providers. This includes automating data capture, improving consistency and strengthening real-time risk-based oversight.

Link to recommendation 13

Recommendation 14

Addressed to MHCLG / Building Safety Regulator

Improve transparency and secure information sharing. Enable structured sharing of regulatory data between providers, the SCR, Government and the public to support accountability and risk based oversight.

Link to recommendation 14

Recommendation 15

Addressed to MHCLG / Building Safety Regulator

Reform registration and revalidation to support competence without excessive burden. Shift towards CPD based, predictable and harmonised assessment processes that retain experienced inspectors.

Link to recommendation 15

Recommendation 16

Addressed to MHCLG / Building Safety Regulator

Reform the approach to measuring performance. Replace the current burdensome framework with a streamlined, outcome focused approach aligned to statutory purpose.

Link to recommendation 16

Recommendation 17

Addressed to MHCLG / Building Safety Regulator

Reduce OSR indicators to a concise set of no more than 20. Focus on inspection sufficiency, compliance, enforcement, competence and data quality to enable meaningful oversight.

Link to recommendation 17

Recommendation 18

Addressed to MHCLG / Building Safety Regulator

Establish a single professional code of conduct for all BCAs, setting expectations for independence, behaviour and public interest standards across the sector.

Link to recommendation 18

Recommendation 19

Addressed to MHCLG

Improve dutyholder understanding of the building regulations and building control by updating the Manual to the Building Regulations and supporting that with a communication drive.

Link to recommendation 19

Recommendation 20

Addressed to MHCLG

Progress planned work to improve and regulate the warranty market. As part of that consider the issues raised with the panel about the approach to inspections and the impact on BC fees.

Link to recommendation 20

Recommendation 21

Addressed to MHCLG / Building Safety Regulator

Bring together Departmental interests to issue a statement on the future of the CPS scheme. As part of that prioritise and support the BSR's plans to review 'conditions of authorisation'.

Link to recommendation 21

All text above is the review's.