Source · IMB Annual Report
London short term holding facilities (STHF)
AI-generated report summary This report for London STHFs highlights that while holding rooms generally provide a safe environment and inductions are mostly high quality, significant issues persist. Key concerns include chronic understaffing of Border Force leading to long waits, inadequate provisions for extended stays in rooms not designed for them, and a persistent lack of access to personal medication at some facilities. The Board also notes issues with translation services and the absence of direct internet access for detainees.
Year: 2026
Published: 11 Jun 2026
Type: Prison · Cat IRC
Recommendations: 17
Key concerns
Positive findings
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Use of force | 4 | — |
Positive findings
AI-generated summaryThe Board notes that holding rooms remain a safe environment, with vulnerable people and minors regularly checked. Inductions are generally of a high standard. There has been a reduction in overall detention numbers and long stays. Aeromed's 24/7 paramedic service is working well, and escort teams typically use a calm and compassionate approach during removals, often with paramedics present. Complaint responses from Border Force are comprehensive and have shown improvement in sharing.
Key concerns
Again, there have been occasions when a minor is not accompanied by a responsible adult in the controlled waiting area (CWA). Whilst it is not a requirement for unaccompanied minors without a chaperone to have a responsible adult, the Border Force officer monitoring the minor is responsible for the oversight of everyone in the CWA. We would like to see all minors accompanied by a designated responsible adult whilst they are in the CWA.
The family room at London City Airport still contains child-sized benches with an adult-height table, posing a risk of injury to detained individuals.
The Board was not informed immediately when a person being removed from the country absconded form the aircraft and put himself and others at risk.
Insufficient numbers of Border Force officers continue to result in occasional long waits in the CWAs.
Detainees in CWAs have limited privacy, and the CWA at Terminal 2 appears too small for the number of people regularly held there.
Asylum seekers (adults and minors) who have been bailed sometimes face long waits for the service provider (contracted to provide transport and accommodation for asylum seekers) to pick them up. Unavailability of accommodation or transport is often given as the cause. The service has improved with the new providers in place.
Not all of those who are detained are offered a translator on arrival into immigration detention. The Board recommends that, where English is not their first language, they should be offered this, regardless of whether or not an officer believes that the level of English is of a sufficient standard.
Delays and unavailability of certain languages in The Big Word translation service hinder inductions and ongoing communication.
The holding rooms are not equipped for stays over 24 hours, but detained people do sometimes have long stays, often overnight, without sufficient mattresses and blankets.
The temperature in the holding rooms is sometimes too cold for people sitting in a room for an extended period and DCOs are unable to control it directly. This often causes considerable discomfort for the detained people who complain of being cold, even when blankets are supplied.
In previous reports, we have recommended that DCOs are reminded to engage regularly with detained people during their long periods of detention because they may not remember everything they have been told during their induction. This year, again, we observed detained people who would have benefited from a reminder of what was available to them.
Variable quality and tone of responses to IMB monitoring reports suggest agencies may be missing opportunities to learn and improve practices.
Detainees at London City Airport and Eaton House continue to lack access to their own prescribed or over-the-counter medication.
The payphones ceased operating in October 2025. Each holding room has around 10 loan phones available. Detained people do not always remember what they are told at their induction, in that, they are entitled to make a phone call. Here is an example from our monitoring notes at the time: • The payphones in the holding rooms have been disconnected. DCOs advised that people in the holding room could make calls from the phone in the office. They could use loan phones. The loan phone record was scrutinised and it was noted that there had been no phones loaned out in October and November. We have asked that DCOs are aware that they may need to remind detained people of their right to make a call as often they cannot take in all the information they are given at the time of their induction.
We are concerned that the escorting operations team only shared full complaints and response copies with the Board for one in the 13 complaints, owing to wider caution around complainant consent. This has constrained the Board’s ability to monitor the quality and approach of detention services complaints. The Board is pleased to note that the escorting operations team has recently committed to fuller sharing of the complaints received and the responses going forward.
There is, at times, a difference in understanding between the lead escort and the person being removed about whether an FRS payment will be made. This can cause upset and disappointment for the person being removed.
Recommendations
The Board would like to see access to Wi-Fi for detained people across all the holding rooms so that they can access appropriate information.
Response
Partially accepted. Home Office reports little use of the tablets. There is no declared intention to provide Wi-Fi access in the holding rooms.
Recommendation 2
Eaton House and London City Airport urgently need a workable solution for administering personal medication.
Response
Accepted. There has been no progress on this issue.
Recommendation 3
We would like a review of the purpose of the lists of legal advice providers so that those who are detained do not have unrealistic expectations.
Response
Accepted. There has been no progress on this issue and it remains a concern for the Board.
Recommendation 4
The Board recommends that more officers be deployed at peak times to avoid unnecessarily extended periods of detention in the controlled waiting areas and the holding rooms.
Response
Partially accepted. The Board continues to be concerned about the extended periods of detention in the controlled waiting areas.
Recommendation 5
The holding rooms are not equipped for stays over 24 hours and the Board would like to a significant reduction in the 3.35% of detained people experiencing these long stays. We would like to see a reduction to pre-pandemic levels of around 1%.
Response
Partially accepted. The Board continues to monitor stays of over 24 hours and raises any concerns in our reports.
Recommendation 6
The temperature problems in the holding rooms need to be resolved. The Board would like to see DCOs be given some form of control, either by being able to directly adjust the temperature or by asking someone to adjust the temperature at their request.
Response
Partially accepted. There has been no progress this year, but we are hopeful that the refurbishment of the holding rooms will provide a solution to the problem.
Recommendation 7
We would like to see shorter collection waiting times for those seeking asylum and being transferred to asylum accommodation and immigration removal centres.
Response
There is no indication as to whether this was accepted or not. The Board remains concerned by long waits for collection.
Recommendation 8
The detention contractor should ensure that DCOs use The Big Word interpretation service for inducting non-English-speaking passengers and that they should not assume that passengers with a limited grasp of English really understand what they are being told.
Response
Accepted. The Board continues to note occasions when The Big Word should have been used for induction.
Recommendation 9
Delays and unavailability of certain languages in The Big Word translation service need to be addressed.
Response
Accepted. This problem persists at times.
Recommendation 10
DCOs should be reminded to engage regularly with detained people during their long periods of detention, because they do not remember everything they have been told during their induction.
Response
Partially accepted. We continue to observe occasions when residents have not retained information that would have been given on induction.
Recommendation 11
The mattresses in the holding rooms are very thin. We would like Mitie Care & Custody to continue their search for thicker mattresses.
Response
Partially accepted. There has been no change in the mattresses in use.
Recommendation 12
We would like to see that detained people have access to showers even if the shower in the holding room where they are detained is out of action.
Recommendation 13
Ensure that protocols are observed in terms of informing IMB of amber and red incidents.
Recommendation 14
The Board would like to see the lack of signal in Terminal 2 be urgently addressed, so that a translation device can be used to communicate with detained people.
Response
Accepted. This has now been resolved.
Recommendation 15
The Board still remains 5. The Board has concerned when minors observed that some are detained for long minors had extended periods in the CWA. waits in the CWA. There are no facilities for minors in this area, nor is the environment comparable to that in the family room. The Board would like to see these minors accommodated in the holding room instead.
Response
Not accepted. The Board still remains concerned when minors are detained for long periods in the CWA.
Recommendation 16
We seek clarity on the mechanism for deciding whether a removal constitutes a complex case in terms of an escorted removal.
Response
Accepted. This issue has been resolved.
Recommendation 17
The Board has been asking for toilet seats to be installed in all terminal holding rooms for the last few years and we would like to see this issue finally resolved.
Response
Accepted. This issue has now been resolved.
Other reports for London short term holding facilities (STHF)
· Concerns