Source · HSSIB Patient Safety Investigation
Mental health inpatient settings: Creating conditions for learning from deaths in mental health inpatient services and when patients die within 30 days of discharge
Published 30 January 2025
Published
Mental health
This series of investigations was announced by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care in June 2023. We can look at inpatient mental health care in both the NHS and the independent sector in England.
Summary
5 recommendations
4 observations
5 of 5 responded
Safety Recommendations
R/2025/052
Department of Health and Social Care
HSSIB recommends that the Department of Health and Social Care works with NHS England and other relevant stakeholders, to clarify national expectations for meaningful and restorative learning from patient safety events and deaths in mental health services. This is to ensure effective learning is supported through processes that provide high-quality and transparent investigations within a culture of compassion.
NHS England is reviewing and revising its PSIRF guidance on "Engaging and involving patients, families and staff" by Summer 2026. This revision will clarify meaningful engagement, high-quality investigations, and compassion, intending to fulfil the recommendation for mental health services.
Response received 26 August 2025
As the investigation recognises, the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) is a significant and welcome improvement in how the NHS responds to patient safety incidents. It prioritises compassionate engagement of those affected by incidents; the use of systems-based approaches to learning; an emphasis on proportionality that balances the need to invest in understanding what happened with the need to effectively and sustainably reduce risks; and the importance of effective and supportive oversight. The PSIRF was published in the summer of 2022 and became mandatory for healthcare provided under the NHS Standard Contract from April 2024. NHS England has emphasised that implementation of PSIRF is not a ‘once and done’ task, but requires ongoing cycles of planning, implementation, review and improvement. NHS England are confident that as PSIRF is being embedded, the four principles that underpin PSIRF are being realised. It is important that we learn from the implementation of the PSIRF. This is why NHS England committed to review and revise the supporting guidance that underpins PSIRF as implementation generated further insight. As such, NHS England has prioritised review and revision of the ‘’Engaging and involving patients, families and staff following a patient safety incident’’ guide in the first instance. Working with a group of patients, families, NHS leads and staff and academic experts, the guide is being revised to take on board insight from the initial phase of PSIRF implementation and also the findings from the ‘Learn Together’ research led by the Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Research Collaboration. The revision to the guide includes providing further information on what is meant by meaningful and effective engagement and involvement in the response to patient safety events, including in mental health services (the guide is not specific to any one healthcare sector). It emphasises the importance of high quality and transparent investigations, and other learning response methods, conducted with a specific focus on compassion and working with affected patients, staff and families. NHS England are confident the results of this work will fulfil this recommendation from HSSIB’s report. The Government’s 10-Year Health Plan also sets out important and ambitious reforms to improve the quality and safety of health services. As part of these reforms, a revitalised National Quality Board (NQB) will bring together senior clinical and managerial leaders from the NHS and regulatory bodies, along with patients and patient representatives to oversee quality measurement, transparency, improvement and innovation in the NHS and independent sector. We will create a new National Director of Patient Experience to bring patient voice ‘in house’, overseeing the collection of more informed feedback from patients and carers, and making it publicly available. As recommended in Dr Penny Dash’s Review of patient safety across the health and care landscape, this Director will consider formal support for those who have, or believe they have, suffered unsafe care. We will also significantly improve the complaints process within all NHS commissioners and providers, by improving response times to patient safety incidents and complaints by setting clear standards for both the timeliness and the quality of responses to complaints. We will also expect these to be handled within patient experience and patient complaints teams, not via PALS or external advocacy services to ensure a focus on listening, learning and improvement. Actions planned to deliver safety recommendation: NHS England will review and revise the supporting guidance that underpins PSIRF considering insights generated from its initial phase implementation, by Summer 2026. Additional comments: The revised guide and associated documents have been drafted and are now being considered by NHS England editorial team to determine how best to communicate the information that has been developed. Publication/communication plans will be set out in due course. A revitalised National Quality Board (NQB) will bring together senior clinical and managerial leaders from the NHS and regulatory bodies, along with patients and patient representatives to oversee quality measurement, transparency and improvement. We will create a new National Director of Patient Experience to bring patient voice ‘in house’. We will significantly improve the complaints process within all NHS commissioners and providers to set clear standards for both the timeliness and the quality of responses to complaints. Response received on 26 August 2025. HSSIB comment: Further updates from DHSC regarding additional detail will be published when available.
R/2025/053
NHS England
HSSIB recommends that NHS England works with other stakeholders to define the term ‘therapeutic relationship’. This is to support building trust and compassionate relationships between staff and patients from admission to inpatient settings through to discharge, to improve patient outcomes.
NHS England welcomes the recommendation and will define 'therapeutic relationship'. They plan to scope an evidence review by June 2025, establish a working group by September 2025, and publish a defining document by December 2025.
Response received 28 April 2025
NHS England Mental Health, Learning Disability and Autism Programme welcomes the recommendations of the HSSIB investigations ‘Mental health inpatient settings: Creating conditions for learning from deaths in mental health inpatient services and when patients die within 30 days of discharge’. The recommendations align with the ‘Culture of Care Standards’ NHS England » Culture of care standards for mental health inpatient services published by NHS England. Mental healthcare inpatient staff who are enabled to recognise the importance of the therapeutic relationship as the single biggest predictor of patient outcomes will be empowered to improve their practice. A greater understanding of what is meant by the therapeutic relationship will facilitate improvements in patient safety across the Mental healthcare system. Actions planned to deliver safety recommendation: Work with key stakeholders to agree a scope for a review of existing evidence base in relation to the therapeutic relationship in MH settings, by June 2025. Organisational lead: MHLDA Quality Transformation Team. Resource in place to deliver actions: Time protected within existing team to undertake this work. Other dependencies identified: Availability of stakeholders. Additional comments: All actions and subsequent timelines are subject to change due to the NHSE restructure. All stakeholder engagement will include lived experience representation. Establish a working group to collate existing evidence base and agree key inclusion points for a document, by September 2025. Organisational lead: MHLDA Quality Transformation Team. Resource in place to deliver actions: Time protected within existing team to undertake this work. Other dependencies identified: MH PRU have been identified as a key partner to help support this work. Availability and capacity of key stakeholders. Additional comments: All actions and subsequent timelines are subject to change due to the NHSE restructure. Create and publish a document that helps define what is meant by the term ‘therapeutic relationship', by December 2025 to start NHSE publication process. Organisational lead: MHLDA Quality Transformation Team. Resource in place to deliver actions: Time protected within existing team to undertake this work. Other dependencies identified: Availability and capacity of key stakeholders. NHSE publications process Additional comments: All actions and subsequent timelines are subject to change due to the NHSE restructure. Response received on 28 April 2025.
R/2025/054
NHS England
HSSIB recommends that NHS England, working with other relevant national bodies, develops guidance on how to reduce and respond to non-anchored ligature risks. This will help staff to support people who attempt to hurt themselves with non-anchored ligatures and improve patient safety whilst maintaining a therapeutic environment.
NHS England welcomes the recommendation and will develop guidance on non-anchored ligature risks. They plan to establish a working group by September 2025 and create/publish the guidance for staff by December 2025.
Response received 28 April 2025
NHS England Mental Health, Learning Disability and Autism Programme welcomes the recommendations of the HSSIB investigations ‘Mental health inpatient settings: Creating conditions for learning from deaths in mental health inpatient services and when patients die within 30 days of discharge’. The outcomes of the investigations support our work focused on improving patient safety across the Mental healthcare system by reducing restrictive practices and least coercive care. We recognise the importance of approaching this sensitively and compassionately given the experiences of both staff and patients and the complex decision making that is required to consider people’s human rights, least coercive care and safety. Guidance on how to reduce and respond to non-anchored ligature risks will help staff to support people who hurt themselves with non-anchored ligatures and improve patient safety whilst maintaining a therapeutic environment. Actions planned to deliver safety recommendation: Establish a working group with key stakeholders to collate existing evidence base and agree key inclusion points for the guidance document, by September 2025. Organisation lead: MHLDA Quality Transformation Team. Resources in place to deliver actions: Time protected within existing team to undertake this work. Other dependencies identified: NCISH have been identified as a key stakeholder for this work. Availability and capacity of key stakeholders. Additional comments: All actions and subsequent timelines are subject to change due to the NHSE restructure. All stakeholder engagement will include lived experience representation. Create and publish guidance for staff on how to reduce and respond to non-anchored ligature risks in line with personalised safety planning a least coercive care, by December 2025 to start NHSE publication process. Organisation lead: MHLDA Quality Transformation Team. Resources in place to deliver actions: Time protected within existing team to undertake this work. Other dependencies identified: Availability and capacity of key stakeholders. NHSE publications process. Additional comments: All actions and subsequent timelines are subject to change due to the NHSE restructure. Response received on 28 April 2025.
R/2025/055
Department of Health and Social Care
HSSIB recommends that the Department of Health and Social Care creates a national oversight mechanism that supports co-ordination, prioritisation and oversight of safety recommendations to implementation across the system. This is to ensure that recommendations from public inquiries, independent patient safety investigations and other patient safety investigation reports, as well as prevention of future death reports from inquests, are analysed and monitored and reviewed until their implementation using a continuous quality improvement approach to learning.
DHSC will design a national oversight mechanism by Autumn 2025. This mechanism will track, prioritise, and oversee safety recommendation implementation, drawing on existing work and wider government plans.
Response received 19 May 2025
Since 2023, HSSIB, on behalf of the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), has worked with relevant stakeholders and ALBs in a Recommendations to Impact Group. This work will be aligned with wider Government plans for effective monitoring and oversight of government-led inquiries. DHSC will draw on both of these activities to take work forward to design an oversight mechanism that supports the effective implementation and learning from safety recommendations. Any mechanism should enable the tracking, prioritisation and oversight of safety recommendations to implementation. Action planned to deliver safety recommendation: Design a national oversight mechanism to monitor implementation of safety recommendations drawing on work of HSSIB-led Recommendations to Impact Group, by Autumn 2025. Organisational lead: Department of Health and Social Care. Other dependencies identified: Government plans for oversight of government-led inquiries. Response received on 19 May 2025.
R/2025/056
Department of Health and Social Care working with NHS England
HSSIB recommends that the Department of Health and Social Care working with NHS England, and other relevant stakeholders, develop a comprehensive, unified data set with agreed definitions for recording and reporting deaths in mental health services to include deaths that occur within a specific time period after discharge. This will support any revisions required to the current NHS England Learning from Deaths Framework. The creation of a comprehensive, unified data set would enhance system-wide visibility, co-ordination and collaboration, reduce duplication of effort, and maximise the impact of improvement work through strategic oversight.
DHSC recognises the need for a unified dataset but will first focus on making the most of existing data. Following a May 2025 meeting, they plan an Autumn 2025 workshop to map current data flows and definitions, followed by a Nov-Dec 2025 meeting.
Response received 25 August 2025
We recognise that, across health services and system partners, we do not have one clear and coherent picture of mortality data which is required to improve system-wide visibility, co-ordination and collaboration. However, we know that lots of data is collected by providers and commissioners of mental health services, and so we think the best first step towards developing a unified dataset is to consider how we can make the most of the data we already collect. To most effectively work towards addressing this recommendation, it is important that DHSC brings together the appropriate range of expertise to understand how data is used operationally by various partners to support effective decision-making. Any solutions proposed to develop a comprehensive and unified data set need to account for the needs of all system partners to ensure these solutions are effective and do not encounter unexpected barriers on implementation. As a first step to meet this recommendation, DHSC convened a meeting in May 2025 with stakeholders including NHS England, CQC, HSSIB, the Independent Advisory Panel on Deaths in Custody, and other system partners to discuss how the health system collectively can best deliver improvements in the recording and reporting deaths in mental health services. As a result of this meeting, we recognised that, while a uniform dataset is a desirable end-goal, there are challenges which will require long-term actions to address. Many of these challenges were identified in HSSIB's report, including inconsistent definitions, challenges with the timeliness of the data and classification of deaths. However, in the meeting, system partners also recognised that there is more we can do in the short term with the data we do already have available to improve system-wide visibility, co-ordination and collaboration to improve learning from deaths. It was agreed that health system partners should focus in the immediate term on triangulating the key data sources that are currently available to develop a comprehensive picture of mortality data in mental health services. This includes identifying what different definitions are currently used in the reporting and recording of mortality data and mapping the flow of existing data between systems. DHSC will convene a workshop in the autumn to bring colleagues together from across the health system to develop this comprehensive picture. We will use the outcomes from this workshop to identify how to more efficiently use the data we have available. Actions planned to deliver safety recommendation: Creation of a unified data set with agreed definitions for recording and reporting deaths in mental health services to be discussed at a stakeholder meeting convened by DHSC, by May 2025. Additional comments: This meeting has taken place, and it has been agreed that DHSC will convene a further workshop in the autumn to map existing data flows. DHSC, CQC, and NHSE to liaise separately to discuss next steps from Mortality Data Working Group and potential timelines, by June 2025. Additional comments: Agreed that DHSC will convene a further workshop in the autumn to map existing data flows. DHSC workshop on mortality data, by Autumn 2025. Additional comments: As above. The purpose of this workshop will be to map existing mortality data flows across the healthcare system to inform future action to improve mortality data. Mortality Data working group meeting to be reconvened in six months to establish how we can build on the existing data flows to deliver improvements to mortality data, by November - December 2025. Response received on 25 August 2025.
Safety Observations
Observation 1
Observation
Integrated care boards and organisations that provide mental health care can improve patient safety by working together to support the facilitation of cross-organisational investigations and learning. This should be achieved in a way that enables people involved in an investigation to come together to share perspectives and build relationships to enable learning. This may provide opportunities for effective and meaningful organisational learning and facilitate reparation and trust-building for everyone involved.
Observation 2
Observation
Organisations that provide mental health care can improve patient safety by adopting a comprehensive person-centred care approach that prioritises the individual needs, preferences and rights of each patient. This approach should ensure consistent access to meaningful therapeutic activities, actively involve families in care planning and decision making, and create supportive environments tailored to the sensory and emotional needs of neurodivergent individuals.
Observation 3
Observation
NHS boards can improve patient safety by supporting their non-executive directors (NEDs) with responsibility for quality and safety to attend NED-specific training on quality of care and patient safety. This may include modules on compassionate leadership, the importance of psychological safety, safety science in investigations and techniques for supportive challenge. By fostering these skills, NEDs can better understand the complexities of healthcare delivery, engage meaningfully with staff, and ensure that patient safety and quality care remain at the forefront of their governance role.
Observation 4
Observation
Integrated care boards and organisations that provide mental health care can improve safety by involving people with lived experience and family carers in coaching for executive leaders. This could include creating learning networks within provider collaboratives. By embedding these roles, executive teams and non-executive directors would receive direct insights from those with personal experience of mental health services, helping them to co-produce learning from deaths and drive improvements in care.