About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review
Rochford review
CSP: RochfordPublished: June 2026Year of death: 2023Extracted: 10 recs
Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.
The review identifies concerns regarding the impact of coercive control on a vulnerable adult with dementia, inadequate care assessment and withdrawal, and insufficient consideration of the perpetrator's caring role. Issues with inter-agency communication and mental capacity assessments were also highlighted.
Home Office classifications
20 tags
Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.
Victim - mental ill health
Victim - depression
Victim - serious or life limiting illness
Child - primary address same as victim
Perpetrator - was a carer
Perpetrator - carer for victim
Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Perpetrator - known to social services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
DHR process - social services recommendations
DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
DHR process - training recommendation themes
DHR process - policy recommendation themes
DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
DHR process - other recommendation themes
Extracted recommendations
10 recommendations pulled from the report · 6 matched to organisations in the index
Essex Adult Social Care should remind all domiciliary care providers that where there is a concern that a person with care and support needs is being the subject of coercion or controlling behaviour by another, a safeguarding referral should be made.
Essex Adult Social Care should consider how practitioners can be encouraged to consider the possibility that a person is being subject of coercive or controlling behaviour and how this is impacting on their ability to make independent and uninfluenced decisions.
Essex Adult Social Care should ensure that: - • Assessments include the views of other relevant persons, carers and family members, and this is recorded. • Where the local authority is to charge for care and support, there has been a financial assessment, of which the person has a copy, and the person is clear on what the charge will be, and what assistance may be available.
Essex Safeguarding Adult Board should be assured that the recommendation from the previous review in the case of Kimmi has clarified the pathways for persons suffering dementia and that there is clear support and review post diagnosis. This should include ensuring clarity in ongoing prescription of medication.
Addressed to
Essex Safeguarding Adult Board | Southend, Essex and Thurrock Domestic Abuse Board
Essex Safeguarding Adult Board and Southend, Essex and Thurrock Domestic Abuse Board should reiterate to agencies of the partnerships that practitioners accurately record a person’s details who are referred to and involved in a person’s care.
Essex Safeguarding Adult Board should seek reassurance that delays in response from ASC from contact by professionals and the public has been addressed.
Essex Adult Social Care should ensure: - • That when reviews are being undertaken which may lead to the removal of a care package that previous concerns and risks are considered. • That the person’s finances are considered as a possible reason for the request for the care and support to be terminated. • That there is clear guidance to professionals in what circumstances legal advice is sought in cases where the person is considered to have mental capacity but is considered to be vulnerable.
Essex Adult Social Care should consider the learning from recent Safeguarding Adult Reviews regarding the lack of understanding in considering and undertaking carer assessments and develop processes to ensure that the gap is closed. This should be overseen and monitored by the Safeguarding Adults Board.
Addressed to
All agencies | The Safeguarding Adults Board
All agencies when delivering services and support to a person should consider the Think Family approach. The Safeguarding Adults Board should consider how this can be promoted.