Recommendation BCHFT 1
To ensure there is a process for carer’s assessments to be offered as mandatory if a carer is identified and included in any active process.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.
Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.
To ensure there is a process for carer’s assessments to be offered as mandatory if a carer is identified and included in any active process.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
A review of the current domestic abuse policy and consideration to be given to gender bias within this - Update domestic abuse policy to include guidance regarding recognition of gender bias and to see victims of DA face to face rather than telephone /video contact.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
An audit to identify evidence that routine enquiry and appropriate use of risk management tools is taking place during clinical contacts with service users. - Dip Sample audit – sample identified from MARAC.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
A review into seeking to establish why routine enquiry does not appear to be embedded within practice. - Survey Monkey Questionnaire to ask clinicians if they ask routine enquiry and if not why.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
To develop a network of ‘safeguarding supervisors’ with a view to additional training and support into clinical areas.- To train all safeguarding supervisors in routine enquiry and share the learning form themes form DHR’s.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
BSMHFT Staff to offer face to face appointments where domestic abuse is a factor, BSMHFT to review current policy for face to face versus remote video/ telephone contacts.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
GP Medical Practice 4 to receive IRIS training and become an IRIS Practice. (Identification and Referral to Improve Safety) specialist DA programme and training for GP’s.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
GP Medical Practice 3 to receive refresher IRIS training.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Both Practices to have a Was Not Brought/ Did Not Attend policy.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Both Practices to Improve Record keeping by Clinicians and Administrative Staff
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
GP Medical Practice 4 to Link Households
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
GP Medical Practice 3 to train of Staff who are responsible for coding of Mental Health Disorders
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Both Practices to have a policy on following up vulnerable patients upon receipt of any correspondence, including A and E letters, which highlights abuse or mental health concerns (even if they are under Secondary Care).
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Solihull Safeguarding Partners and participating agencies in the DHR, should reassure SSP they will ensure: - • A multi-agency meeting will be called, or a strategy discussion held where applicable, to make certain, risk assessments and communication between practitioners, consider the full facts of an adult at risk or associated adult, in order that necessary safeguarding action is taken. • Professionals should be encouraged to challenge the decisions or actions by another agency in a safeguarding enquiry. Practitioners should raise the concerns to their line manager and if the matter is unresolved should use either the SSP Escalation Policy2 or their own agencies escalation policy to address the issue in question. • Remind supervisors and practitioners through training, of their responsibilities of effective information sharing, risk assessments, comprehensive record keeping, and communication, that it is imperative for safeguarding and the protection of adults at risk.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
It is recommended that the safeguarding partners and voluntary agencies involved in the DHR reassure SSP that in adult at risk cases the following initiatives are considered and where relevant, enacted: • Practitioners to enact existing Domestic Violence Protection Notices and Orders (to be known in the future, when rolled out in England, as DAPN and DAPO’s) that consolidates protection orders and non-molestation orders under the Domestic Abuse Act 2021. • Utilise Home Office ASB Guidance 2022, community protection notices, orders, and court injunction initiatives in cases of persistent ASB incidents. • Police in DA cases, where there is sufficient evidence, when the victim does not or is unable to support a criminal prosecution, to consider CPS evidence led victimless prosecutions, if it is appropriate for the case, in order to protect an adult at risk.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
It is recommended that safeguarding partners and voluntary agencies involved in the DHR reassure SSP that they will ensure staff: - • Know their powers or action to take when the signs and symptoms of coercive, emotional, and manipulative controlling behaviour of an adult at risk are identified, in conjunction with the Domestic Abuse Act 2021. • To be alert to situational violence and the role of violent resistance alongside intimate partner violence as describe in Johnson (2008) typology of intimate domestic violence. • Enquiries must be conducted as to the suitability of the role of a carer, where safeguarding concerns of domestic abuse and other serious concerns have been raised to ensure compliance with Local and National Safeguarding Adult Policy and Procedures and the outcome shared with relevant agencies to support practice.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
It is recommended that safeguarding partners and voluntary agencies involved in the DHR reassure SSP that their supervisors and staff will ensure: - • Agencies should conduct their own risk assessment and not rely on the interpretation of another agency and refer to the MARAC if an agency professional considers it a potential risk requiring action to be taken. • A domestic abuse case or any safeguarding referral should not be closed without supervision oversight, to ensure that all available action, levels of risk assessments and safeguarding plans are completed with the rationale recorded. • More professional curiosity must be displayed to ensure that practitioners consider all aspects of domestic abuse of an adult at risk, to protect their health and well-being, utilising the supportive services of an IDVA, other support services and to address incident led responses to ensure they are comprehensively risk assessed where necessary.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
It is recommended that West Midlands Police, reassure SSP that they will: - • Ensure their supervisors and staff are cognisant of domestic abuse and anti-social behaviour guidance, in order to recognise and take remedial action to address any increase in the volume and intensity of incidents, utilising current DA and ASB legislation and other available powers. • To ensure the continued dip sampling of the quality of WMP domestic abuse investigations to ensure good practice and lessons are being learnt, including from previous statutory reviews, HMICFRS inspections, and complying with Local and National Safeguarding Adult Policies and Procedures.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
It is recommended that safeguarding partners and voluntary agencies involved in the DHR, reassure SSP that in adult at risk cases where there is a possible concern of poor mental health and a lack of mental capacity, they must ensure that a Mental Capacity Assessment is always considered or seek the advice from a Mental Health Professional or Independent Mental Capacity Advocate, to ensure the ‘best interest’ decision is being taken and their risk is assessed, as capacity can fluctuate according to a person’s complex needs.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
It is recommended that the Solihull MBC Safeguarding Partners, and voluntary organisations, reassure Solihull Safeguarding Partnership that their staff are made aware of and ensure that adult at risk safeguarding referrals are diligently submitted to the SMBC ASC Triage Process of Safeguarding Referrals within the Adult Duty Team, for screening and necessary action to be completed.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
It is recommended that the Solihull MBC Adult Social Care: - • Promote the awareness of the SMBC ASC Triage Process of Safeguarding Referrals within the Adult Duty Team, including the existing safeguarding referral pathways for the expectations and information of multi-agency partners. • To ensure greater visibility on Solihull MBC’s website of the Triage Process of Safeguarding Referrals which should be readily accessible to multi-agency safeguarding partners, agencies, and professionals.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Undertake Hate Crime awareness training for Contact Centre Staff
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Define the routes to give an effective response to Hate Crime following initial report.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Develop professional curiosity through training and development for identified staff.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Housing Options Officers to buddy and shadow Neighbourhood Officers at partnerships to improve networks.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Hold Joint Team Meeting Event(s) with Mental Health Service centre.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Introduce a buddy system between Housing Options Staff and Neighbourhood Staff.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Undertaking timely and dynamic risk assessments.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Brief all staff on Interpreting services and how to offer and access them.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Produce Guidance for SCH staff for clarity working with GPs and how to make referrals.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
DA - Meeting to be arranged with Trust IDVAs to discuss perpetrator pathway.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
DA - Perpetrator pathway to be written and agreed at Board.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Update Missing persons procedure (Datix system).
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Audit of those who leave ED before assessment.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Feedback to GP Practice regarding the good practice identified.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Remind GPs at their forums that it is important to ask about DA at every appointment after there has been disclosed and a flag should be added to the patient record.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
Increase knowledge of referrals for vulnerable adults and increase use of referral portal. Increase officers’ general knowledge of vulnerability; what it entails, types of vulnerability and how to manage vulnerability when it is identified.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗
A mandatory video training package will be created with instructions on when to use the portal, how to use the portal and the potential outcomes following referrals made via the portal.
Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗