About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Manchester review

CSP: Manchester Published: February 2026 Year of death: 2021 Extracted: 9 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identified limited agency involvement and missed opportunities for intervention despite indicators of domestic abuse, alcohol misuse, and the victim's vulnerability. There was a lack of professional curiosity and timely information sharing regarding the perpetrator's behaviour and the victim's care needs.

Home Office classifications

34 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - alcohol misuse
  • Victim - housing issues
  • Victim - physical disability
  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - depression
  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Children - living with victim (including adult children)
  • Children - living with perpetrator (including adult children)
  • Children - present at homicide (including adult children)
  • Child - primary address same as victim
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
  • Perpetrator - housing issues
  • Perpetrator - physical disability
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to housing services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
  • DHR process - social services recommendations
  • DHR process - housing services recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

9 recommendations pulled from the report · 5 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 8.1

Addressed to Manchester Community Safety Partnership

For consideration to be given to strengthening public awareness in relation to domestic abuse, coercive or controlling behaviours and how members of the public can report any concerns.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8.2

Addressed to Manchester Community Safety Partnership

For consideration to be given to strengthening public awareness in relation to increased alcohol consumption post pandemic and domestic abuse.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8.3

Addressed to Housing Providers

It is recommended there be a facilitated discussion with the relevant partner Housing Providers concerning any further initiative-taking measures that Housing Providers can take through their housing management processes, to ensure that vulnerable tenants are safe.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8.4

Addressed to Manchester Community Safety Partnership

It is recommended that the CSP undertake further discussions with the DWP regarding any further checks and balances that then DWP can take to ensure that any applications for benefits are cross referenced with relevant housing providers in order to ensure that tenancy agreements are not being breached.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8.5

Addressed to Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust | NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board

For referrals to the Alcohol Care Team to be made on the basis of clear evaluation and scoring.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8.6

Addressed to Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board

For Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board to explore the issue of background checks for persons providing care on an informal or unregulated basis, to amend policy where appropriate and to incorporate into continuing professional development.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation A.1

Addressed to Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board

For GPs to be professionally curious and enquire about domestic abuse whenever there are indicators such as depression or low mood, considering the wider impact to carers/children.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation A.2

Addressed to Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board

That the learning from this review is included within the IRIS training particularly given the prevalence of domestic abuse towards older people from family members and children and that older people may face additional barriers to accessing help and support.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation A.3

Addressed to Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board

For GPs to routinely enquire as to the reason for any persistent or frequent non-attendance at hospital appointments and consider the safeguarding impact to the patient by following their non-attendance / ‘was not brought’ policies.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗