About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Liverpool review

CSP: Liverpool Published: February 2026 Year of death: 2021 Extracted: 8 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identified systemic failures in inter-agency information sharing, risk assessment, and proactive intervention regarding domestic abuse. Professionals missed opportunities to identify escalating risks and address the perpetrator's abusive behaviour, compounded by his asylum status and the victim's vulnerabilities.

Home Office classifications

43 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - pregnancy
  • Victim - referred to marac at any time
  • Victim - case heard at marac before homicide
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (victim and perpetrator)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between victims)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between perpetrators)
  • Children - living with victim (including adult children)
  • Children - living with perpetrator (including adult children)
  • Children - present at homicide (including adult children)
  • Child - primary address same as victim
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - anxiety
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - post traumatic stress disorder (ptsd)
  • Perpetrator - self harm
  • Perpetrator - suicidal thoughts
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to social services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to idva or other domestic abuse support service as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to friends as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - supervised by mental health services
  • Perpetrator - immigration involvement
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family consulted about terms of reference
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - social services recommendations
  • DHR process - housing services recommendations
  • DHR process - other educational institution recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

8 recommendations pulled from the report · 1 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to All agencies

That all agencies provide evidence that professionals are adopting a proactive approach to gathering information from individuals, and where additional sources of information are identified, this is followed up.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to All agencies

That all agencies provide evidence that professionals are adopting a ‘trust but verify’ approach when working with individuals, which includes the accurate recording and verification of information to inform assessment and risk planning.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to MARAC Steering Group

That MARAC Steering Group provides Liverpool Community Safety Partnership with a report as to individual agencies’ contribution and representation at MARAC. The report should identify what action is being taken to address any identified gaps within multi-agency involvement, including involvement of non-statutory organisations. This recommendation can be achieved through an audit of MARAC attendance – to identify gaps and provide City Safe Board with information to address gaps with partners at a strategic level.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Bedspace

That Bedspace provides Liverpool City Council Safer & Stronger Communities Team with a report as to the timescales for the implementation of domestic abuse training to their staff. Updates to the implementation can be provided at 3-, 6- and 12-month intervals.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Further and higher education providers

That further and higher education providers work closely with MARAC Steering Group to develop information sharing pathways in relation to domestic abuse incidents and safeguarding concerns.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to Liverpool Children’s Social Care

That Liverpool Children’s Social Care provides a report to Liverpool Community Safety Partnership on the co-ordination, supervision, and management of Early Help action plans. That report should address the identified learning within this review.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 7

Addressed to All agencies

That all agencies should provide Liverpool City Council Safer & Stronger Communities Team with evidence and assurances that any contact, whether verbal or written, with individuals whose first language is not English, is undertaken in a format in which they can understand.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8

Addressed to Home Office | United Kingdom Visa and Immigration Service

That Home Office and United Kingdom Visa and Immigration Service should ensure that local intelligence regarding those seeking asylum is taken into account as part of the decision-making process for those charged with considering asylum applications.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗