About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Gloucestershire review

CSP: Gloucestershire Published: October 2025 Year of death: 2021 Extracted: 16 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review highlights a complex interplay of domestic abuse, mental health issues, substance use, and child removal, which exacerbated the victim's distress and increased suicide risk. It also identifies significant barriers to disclosure and help-seeking, including cultural and language factors, and a lack of system cultural competency.

Home Office classifications

38 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - died by suicide
  • Victim - alcohol misuse
  • Victim - housing issues
  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - anxiety
  • Victim - depression
  • Victim - post traumatic stress disorder (ptsd)
  • Victim - self harm
  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Victim - immigration involvement
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (victim and perpetrator)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between victims)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between perpetrators)
  • Children - subject to child protection or domestic abuse prior to homicide
  • Children - removed into care
  • Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to social services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to idva or other domestic abuse support service as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to probation services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - supervised by probation services
  • Perpetrator - immigration involvement
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • DHR process - police recommendations
  • DHR process - social services recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - idva or other domestic abuse support service recommendations
  • DHR process - probation services recommendations
  • DHR process - housing services recommendations
  • DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

16 recommendations pulled from the report · 8 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 4.1.3

Addressed to Gloucestershire Domestic Abuse Support Service (GDASS)

GDASS will encourage staff to clearly express and document curiosity relating to other parties connected to clients (in relation to the perpetrator being referred to as the lodger). Whilst it is not clear that a relationship had formed during the support period, it would have been useful to have had any queries or concerns about the lodger documented so that this could be more explicit in writing this report.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.1.5

Addressed to Housing Services

Training around housing options for professionals across the system should be considered around how people can access housing related services.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.1.6

Addressed to Probation Service

Practitioners should consider Police checks and sharing of relevant risk information to agencies at the termination of a sentence as standard practice for all cases regardless of level of risk. Decision making in this regard should be recorded on the Probation case notes system (n-delius) and included in the final risk assessment (OASys).

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.1.7

Addressed to Probation Service

Foreign Nationals should be considered for an interpreter and this consideration logged on the Probation case notes system (n-delius) and included in the risk assessment (OASys).

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.1.8

Addressed to Probation Service

Where a victim is identified as being a Foreign National communication for initial contact i.e. letter should be sent in their native language to encourage response and make the offer of the service clear to them.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.1.12

Addressed to Police | Office for the Police and Crime Commissioner

The Police and Office for the Police and Crime Commissioner should review resource for the police and crisis team partnership to ensure it meets the demand needs and incorporated specific recognition of more complex cases where the individual may require an interpreter.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.1.15

Addressed to Gloucestershire Children Social Care

It is therefore recommended that there is an opportunity to use systemic practice to review work with parents who are not engaged in court proceedings or where they are not having contact with their children in care.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.1.16

Addressed to Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust

For GHC services to always consider a translator if there is any doubt that a service user may have difficulty with understanding due to a language barrier. If a suitable translator is unavailable, document and plan about the need for re-assessment with a translator present.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.1.17

Addressed to Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust

For all GHC services to consider asking clients/patients about domestic abuse, and when appropriate they do so, documenting each time in records the conversation around this. This is in line with the GHC Domestic Abuse Policy 2021 in which ‘All Trust colleagues ask about domestic abuse as part of the core Assessment, and to maintain records according to guidance and policy’.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.1.18

Addressed to Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust

GHC practitioners involved with child protection process to ensure that they receive the minutes of any meetings and upload them to the children’s health records ensuring that there is an accurate copy of the children’s plan and evidence of the meeting for practitioners to refer back too.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.2.2

Addressed to Local Domestic Abuse Partnership Board (LDAPB) | Gloucestershire Suicide Prevention Partnership

The Local Domestic Abuse Partnership Board (LDAPB) should consider therapeutic pathways for victims of domestic abuse to ensure access to trauma-informed mental health related support. This could be discussed jointly with the Gloucestershire Suicide Prevention Partnership.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.2.3

Addressed to All agencies from the panel

All agencies from the panel to review their practice and pathways in to the services they offer to ensure there is practical support available for victims of domestic abuse so they have the best opportunity to access specialist services (such as mental health related support or domestic abuse services) should they choose to.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.2.4

Addressed to Local Domestic Abuse Partnership Board (LDAPB) | Gloucestershire Suicide Prevention Partnership

The LDAPB should work with the Gloucestershire Suicide Prevention Partnership to conduct a thematic review of local suicide DHRs and based on the findings consider recommendations to develop specific risk assessment and support pathways for victims at risk of suicide.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.2.5

Addressed to The training task group (under the LDAPB)

The training task group (under the LDAPB) should convene a learning event around intersectionality and lessons from this review.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.2.6

Addressed to The training task group (under the LDAPB)

The training task group (under the LDAPB) should ensure that intersectionality is a feature in the training pathway review.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4.3.1

Addressed to Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities | Central Government departments | Domestic Abuse Commissioners Office

The Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities should review with wider Central Government departments and the Domestic Abuse Commissioners Office the impact the statutory duty to provide support within safe accommodation has on community-based provision to ensure Local Authorities have adequate resource to commission wider support such as therapeutic support and specialist support for marginalised communities (particularly who may have limited safe accommodation options and thus only ever seek support within the community).

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗