About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Somerset review

CSP: Somerset Published: September 2025 Year of death: 2022 Extracted: 7 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review highlights systemic failures in understanding trauma and domestic abuse, leading to missed opportunities for risk assessment, information sharing, and appropriate interventions for the victim. It also notes unconscious bias in agency responses, often blaming the victim while colluding with the perpetrator.

Home Office classifications

38 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - was a carer
  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between perpetrators)
  • Children - living with victim (including adult children)
  • Children - living with perpetrator (including adult children)
  • Children - present at homicide (including adult children)
  • Children - subject to child protection or domestic abuse prior to homicide
  • Children - removed into care
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to social services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to health services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to mental health services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to idva or other domestic abuse support service as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to probation services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to housing services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - sexual abuse
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - social services recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - idva or other domestic abuse support service recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

7 recommendations pulled from the report · 1 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Safer Somerset Partnership

Safer Somerset Partnership to evaluate their training offer which includes:
• ACEs.
• Trauma Informed Practice.
• Unconscious bias.
• Domestic Abuse Disclosure Scheme.
• Counter Allegations.
• Professional Curiosity.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to Children Social Care

Where there is possible domestic abuse, FSG workers are to obtain consent from the non-abusive parent, discuss at group supervision and seek consultation with the specialist domestic abuse worker with regards to risk and intervention.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Children Social Care | SIDAS | SDAS | Open Mental Health

All family safeguarding practitioners when identifying domestic abuse through assessment should be confident and competent in completing the DASH in advance of forwarding to specialist domestic abuse support.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Domestic Abuse Commissioner Office for England and Wales

MARAC to have the same statutory framework as other conferences where vulnerable people’s safety and wellbeing are discussed to ensure tighter and robust accountability for actions and sharing of information.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Domestic Abuse Board

All agencies to ensure those completing the DASH understand any cases where there has been Non-Fatal Strangulation is a high-risk factor and is to be referred to MARAC with detail provided within the risk assessment.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to SIDAS

SIDAS to have contact with clients weekly and future appointments to be offered to clients after each support session. These are to be evidenced on the case file with explanations provided if this is not achievable.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 7

Addressed to Nextlink (North Somerset MARAC)

North Somerset MARAC Protocol, section 5.13 (MARAC to MARAC transfer) to be amended and include: ‘when an action has been identified within the meeting for a MARAC to MARAC transfer the lead professional for this is the MARAC coordinator and this is to be completed within 48 hours of the meeting’.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗