About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Torfaen review

CSP: Torfaen Published: May 2025 Year of death: 2021 Extracted: 7 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identified pervasive coercive control, missed opportunities for agency intervention due to limited professional curiosity and unconscious bias, and a lack of community awareness regarding domestic abuse signs and reporting pathways.

Home Office classifications

33 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - housing issues
  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - anxiety
  • Victim - depression
  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - anxiety
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - serious or life limiting illness
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to idva or other domestic abuse support service as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to housing services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to friends as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - sexual abuse
  • Aggravating factors - economic abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family consulted about terms of reference
  • DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - police recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - housing services recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

7 recommendations pulled from the report · 4 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Government Departments | Local Authorities

Information and campaigns aimed at community members on domestic abuse at any age and in different circumstances, and especially in relation to coercive control need to be reinforced both on a national and local level. There are some positive examples detailed above but is recommended the awareness raising and bystander type campaigns are regularly repeated in a way that doesn’t lead to them not being impactful.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to Public Services Board/VAWDASV Partnership

Public Services Board/VAWDASV Partnership to consider sharing this report and recommendations with the Wales VAWDASV National Advisors, and to ask if the National Training Framework could be expanded to include additional agencies including solicitors and estate agents who are likely to encounter citizens during stressful and emotional times.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Local Authorities | NHS

The local commissioning of older persons specialist staff and the work of the Older Person’s commissioner on abuse of older adults to be promoted to aid recognition of domestic abuse within older relationships and referral routes for support. With family consent this report and findings could be utilised as a case study for learning.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to NHS | Welsh Ambulance Service Trust | Gwent Police

Ask and Act training to be considered for wider staff within agencies, including NHS employed counselling staff and control centre staff within WAST and Gwent Police with a focus on domestic abuse within all relationships including older adults.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Regional Safeguarding Boards | VAWDASV Partnership

Region to consider further training on recognition and referral for those displaying and/or expressing abuse behaviour including mapping of services that support behavioural change and recognition of risk to partners. With consent, this report and recommendations could be utilised to raise awareness of the need to engage with potential perpetrators, with a focus on older and perceived frail adults.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to Gwent Police | Welsh Government VAWDASV team

Gwent Police are piloting the Domestic Abuse Risk Assessment (DARA) tool alongside the DASH risk assessment due to highlighted concerns in some of the key questions which may result in a lower risk score for older adults (as an example in relation to pregnancy). The region and or Welsh Government VAWDASV team may wish to consider a task and finish group to share learning and good practice.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 7

Addressed to Gwent VAWDASV Board | Gwent Safeguarding Board

Report and recommendations to be shared with the Gwent VAWDASV and Safeguarding Boards to consider the support available to those who own their own homes, like, and in line with the support available via dedicated safeguarding and domestic abuse practitioners within registered housing associations. This is particularly a concern where couples are assessed as standard to medium risk and therefore not supported via MARAC.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗