About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review
Northumberland review
CSP: NorthumberlandPublished: November 2024Year of death: 2020Extracted: 8 recs
Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.
The review highlights systemic failures in the risk assessment and management of the perpetrator by probation and police, alongside inadequate information sharing between agencies. This contributed to a lack of awareness and intervention regarding the victim's escalating domestic abuse and coercive control.
Home Office classifications
21 tags
Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.
Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
Perpetrator - case heard in court
Perpetrator - issued life sentence
Perpetrator - substance misuse
Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Perpetrator - supervised by probation services
Aggravating factors - separation
Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
Aggravating factors - stalking
Aggravating factors - physical stalking
Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
DHR process - family contributed to dhr
DHR process - family consulted about terms of reference
DHR process - family received draft report
DHR process - probation services recommendations
DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
DHR process - training recommendation themes
DHR process - policy recommendation themes
DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
Extracted recommendations
8 recommendations pulled from the report · 5 matched to organisations in the index
Addressed to
His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service
That His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service annually audit a sample of risk assessments to provide assurance that where relevant domestic abuse flags are in place and reflected in risk assessment considerations.
That Northumberland Prison ensures that all intelligence and allegations are formally recorded on official systems (including where the prisoner has left the establishment but remains on live licence). A clear decision should be recorded as to whether that intelligence needs to be shared with other agencies for crime prevention or safeguarding purposes.
Addressed to
Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service
That Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service ensure that probation staff should have clear guidance in relation to reporting to police the presence of unlawfully at large individuals on their premises.
That the Safer Northumberland Partnership ensures that the findings of this review are disseminated to support local training and practice improvement.
That the Safer Northumberland Partnership seek the support of the Domestic Abuse Commissioner to highlight to the UK banking industry the importance of reporting unusual banking activity which can be an indicator of domestic and financial abuse.
That the Northumberland County Council Domestic Abuse Policy to be made available to all schools and education settings, allowing them to either adopt the policy or to integrate the relevant elements into their staff wellbeing policy.
That the Home Secretary and Justice Minister duly consider the public’s concerns in relation to serious crimes committed by prisoners unlawfully at large and maximise opportunities to prevent this before a finite period has elapsed. This is particularly important where previous convictions relate to either violence, domestic violence, or coercive control, and introduction of further legislation, national protocols and operational guidance should be considered.
That the Home Office in its forthcoming review of DHR statutory guidance gives consideration as to clarification in relation to the sharing of parallel review reports with DHR Chairs to reduce duplication and assist in expediting reviews.