About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Enfield review

CSP: Enfield Published: October 2024 Year of death: 2016 Extracted: 9 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review highlights inadequate mental health assessments and care for the perpetrator, poor inter-agency communication and information sharing, and a lack of clear responsibility for case management, compounded by resource constraints in mental health services.

Home Office classifications

27 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Children - living with victim (including adult children)
  • Children - living with perpetrator (including adult children)
  • Children - present at homicide (including adult children)
  • Child - primary address same as victim
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - substance misuse
  • Perpetrator - housing issues
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - panic attacks
  • Perpetrator - psychosis
  • Perpetrator - self harm
  • Perpetrator - suicidal thoughts
  • Perpetrator - suicide attempts
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to health services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - supervised by mental health services
  • DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

9 recommendations pulled from the report · 8 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to NHS North Central London ICB

Primary care professionals should be reminded to utilise all opportunities available to them to engage with adolescent and young adult patients to promote engagement of the adolescent or young person.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to NHS North Central London ICB | Barnet, Enfield & Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust

Consideration must be given in primary and secondary care to systems and processes which could be utilised to facilitate information sharing in respect of victims and perpetrators believed to be involved in domestic abuse, to improve the information available across health services.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to NHS North Central London ICB

GPs must be reminded of the need to consider direct contact with patients when family or friends have confidentially expressed concerns relating to the patient’s poor mental health in order to increase the likelihood of serious deterioration being assessed and appropriate actions to maintain the safety of the patient and others who may be at risk.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Barnet, Enfield & Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust

BEH Mental Health Trust to review and agree a protocol for the timeliness and content of communications between secondary mental health service and primary care, especially in complex cases and those with risks of harm to self and/or others to improve the information available to primary care services.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Barnet, Enfield & Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust

BEH Mental Health Trust should review the information provided on its website to improve public understanding of mental health services and increase the likelihood of sufferers receiving appropriate care.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to Metropolitan Police | London Borough of Enfield

It is recommended that the MPS North Area BCU Senior Leadership Team conduct periodic dip sampling to ensure compliance in the completion of vulnerable adult coming to notice reports on MERLIN in order to share information with partners, reporting results to the LBE Domestic Abuse Co-ordinator.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 7

Addressed to Barnet, Enfield & Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust

BEH Mental Health Trust should review practice to ensure that: a) Where a decision is made to change a treatment plan for a patient, there should be evidence of discussion/second opinions and documentation of the reasons for change and the alternative arrangements, including contingency plans. b) Care to be taken to ensure adequate completion of risk assessment documentation c) Care to be taken to ensure appropriate information is sent on time to referrers/GPs d) All North Middlesex Mental Health Liaison Service (NMMHLS) staff to be reminded to use the shared databases of information regarding previous patient admissions and more widely to include the MASH facilities where possible. This will increase the likelihood of decisions being based on clear and robust assessments and care planning.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8

Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Financial resources for funding increased bed capacity within the mental health sphere is required to meet demonstrated demand. Additional resources will also be required to adequately fund co-ordination between partner agencies within and beyond the NHS in order to implement the “Right Care, Right Person” policy.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9

Addressed to Enfield Strategic Partnership

The “Right Care, Right Person” policy should be implemented as a matter of urgency, commensurate with the funding available. Particular care will be required to develop suitable communication mechanisms to ensure that Right Care, Right Person can provide the most appropriate interventions.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗