About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

East Sussex review

CSP: East Sussex Published: March 2024 Year of death: 2016 Extracted: 15 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The report highlights gaps in public and professional understanding of coercive control and stalking, limitations of risk-led approaches for victims not identifying as abused, and issues with repeat offender management and probation record retention.

Home Office classifications

22 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - depression
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - housing issues
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to probation services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to workplace (employer) as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - stalking
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • Aggravating factors - economic abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - police recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - probation services recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations

Extracted recommendations

15 recommendations pulled from the report · 4 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation HM2

Addressed to Health in Mind (Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust)

All staff to be aware of and able to use MARAC DASH tool

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation HM3

Addressed to Health in Mind (Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust)

DASLs to be in place in Health in Mind and promoted to all clinicians as points of guidance/ consultation.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation HM4

Addressed to Health in Mind (Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust)

Learning to be shared across the Trust/ organisation

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation MA1

Addressed to East Sussex Safer Communities Partnership

The East Sussex Safer Communities Partnership should ensure there is further publicity to raise awareness amongst the general public of the following issues: o Coercive control and the risks associated with it o Stalking behaviours and the help available o Domestic Violence Disclosure Scheme with particular emphasis on the range of people who have the ‘right to ask’.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation MA2

Addressed to Hastings and Rother Clinical Commissioning Group | East Sussex County Council | Safer East Sussex Team | East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust | Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

The responsible commissioner (Hastings and Rother Clinical Commissioning Group) should work with the lead commissioners for specialist services (East Sussex County Council, Safer East Sussex Team) and providers (the East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, the Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust and specialist services) to evaluate the impact of the IRIS pilot and, if it is successful, sustain and embed this provision locally.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation MA3

Addressed to Eastbourne, Hailsham and Seaford Clinical Commissioning Group | NHS High Weald Lewes Havens Clinical Commissioning Group

The other Clinical Commissioning Groups in the county (Eastbourne, Hailsham and Seaford Clinical Commissioning Group and NHS High Weald Lewes Havens Clinical Commissioning Group) should, if the IRIS pilot is successful, review the findings in order to consider its wider rollout in other General Practice settings across East Sussex.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation MA4

Addressed to East Sussex Safer Communities Partnership

That East Sussex Safer Communities Partnership request a report from Sussex Police outlining changes made with regard to practice on stalking and harassment cases.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation MA5

Addressed to East Sussex Safer Communities Partnership

The East Sussex Safer Communities Partnership should review pathways so that victims of domestic abuse incidents (not just crimes) are offered a referral to a domestic abuse specialist service.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation MA6

Addressed to Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner | East Sussex Safer Communities Partnership

Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner and the East Sussex Safer Communities Partnership should review the current commissioning arrangements for standard risk victims, identifying how to ensure that all victims are able to access help and support from a domestic abuse specialist service.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation N1

Addressed to National Probation Service | Community Rehabilitation Companies

The National Probation Service and Community Rehabilitation Companies to review their record retention policy with reference to crimes of violence against women and to report the findings to the Home Office DHR Quality Assurance Panel.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation N2

Addressed to Crown Prosecution Service

The Crown Prosecution Service to undertake a thematic review of charging decisions on stalking and harassment cases. This should particularly focus on offenders who move across geographical borders and include consideration of the criteria used to determine whether a charge of harassment or stalking is applied.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation SP1

Addressed to Sussex Police

That the one day domestic abuse training is converted into a ‘requestable course’ within six months and that a review process is put in place to establish numbers requiring training.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗