About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

East Sussex review

CSP: East Sussex Published: March 2024 Year of death: 2018 Extracted: 34 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identified systemic failures in multi-agency risk assessment and information sharing regarding domestic abuse, mental health, and offender management. Key concerns include missed opportunities for routine enquiry in health settings, inadequate use of disclosure schemes, and insufficient management of the perpetrator's high-risk behaviour by probation services.

Home Office classifications

42 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - was a carer
  • Victim - carer for perpetrator
  • Victim - alcohol misuse
  • Victim - substance misuse
  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - anxiety
  • Victim - depression
  • Victim - self harm
  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Victim - referred to marac at any time
  • Victim - case heard at marac before homicide
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
  • Perpetrator - substance misuse
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - psychosis
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to health services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to probation services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - sexual abuse
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • Aggravating factors - economic abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family consulted about terms of reference
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - police recommendations
  • DHR process - social services recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

34 recommendations pulled from the report · 23 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to East Sussex Community Safety Partnership

East Sussex Community Safety Partnership should seek assurance that all health services in their area have implemented policies, pathways and staff training to support routine enquiry in domestic abuse.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to Health agencies in East Sussex

Health agencies in East Sussex should ensure that all clinicians are readily identifiable in case notes and in the decisions they have made.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to East Sussex Community Safety Partnership

East Sussex Community Safety Partnership should raise awareness amongst partner agencies of the benefits and opportunities of the Domestic Violence Disclosure Scheme and the process of applying for safe disclosure to victims of their abuser’s history of violence and abuse

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to MARAC Steering Group | The MARAC Support Team

MARAC Steering Group • all MARAC partners to send a representative from the relevant service/team to take part in the MARAC where there is significant involvement (current or historic) that impacts on current risk management and safety planning • to take pro-active steps to take further actions or alternative actions to address the risk/issue identified at MARAC, including all realistic means of managing the offender • to consider how MARAC action plans and case management can be overseen and by whom • An information sharing mechanism to be developed between GP Practices and the MARAC The MARAC Support Team • to consider how to identify the relevant social housing provider so that they are invited to MARAC for cases where their tenants are featured • to ensure that records of MARAC meetings accurately reflect the sources of information received

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to East Sussex Safer Communities Partnership

East Sussex Safer Communities Partnership should seek assurance from agencies that they are capable of harnessing multi-agency action to effectively manage and constrain perpetrators of domestic abuse.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to East Sussex Health and Wellbeing Board

East Sussex Health and Wellbeing Board seeks assurance from its agencies that they are delivering their responsibilities to carers under the Care Act 2014.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 7

Addressed to Ministry of Justice

That the report is shared with the Ministry of Justice in order that: • the implications of shortages of probation officers on professional standards are noted • consideration is given, within the restructure of the probation services, to the professional registration of probation officers to ensure that individual standards of professional practice can be regulated • consideration is given to providing a list of internationally commensurate probation qualifications

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation CGL1

Addressed to Change Grow Live Domestic Abuse Portal

Where there is a discrepancy to a risk assessment based on a further assessment or professional judgement, it is first discussed with the referring agency, before implementing service processes relevant to that risk level.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation CGL2

Addressed to Change Grow Live Domestic Abuse Portal

Creative engagement should still be a consideration, whilst following safe practices. Joint visits especially in services where the victim already attends is considered good practice, e.g. GP or Probation. If engagement is not possible the Portal will offer consultation to other professionals where the victim is likely to attend. This must also be balanced and in accordance with GDPR.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation CGL3

Addressed to Change Grow Live Domestic Abuse Portal

Services to bring creative suggestions to MARAC, ensure that DVPO/DVDs and community and statutory services are considered for victim and offender.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation ESCCASC2

Addressed to East Sussex County Council Adult Social Care

Ensure all communication/ risks discussions at MARAC are appropriately updated onto both ESCC & SPFT IT systems ASAP but no longer that 24 hours following MARAC discussion.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation ESHT2

Addressed to East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust

Demonstrate that efforts to improve staff awareness and responses to domestic abuse in recent times are proving successful.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation ESHT3

Addressed to East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust

As well as training to identify signs and indicators of domestic abuse, training, procedures and pathways need to be embedded about how practitioners/clinicians respond effectively to domestic abuse.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation KSSCRC2

Addressed to Kent Surrey and Sussex Community Rehabilitation Company

KSS CRC Senior Probation Officers to demonstrate professional curiosity and effective management oversight.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation KSSCRC3

Addressed to Kent Surrey and Sussex Community Rehabilitation Company

KSS CRC to ensure that the competencies of temporary and/or agency staff are checked.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation SCCG1

Addressed to Sussex Clinical Commissioning Groups

That codes on the case recording system are used to flag people at risk of domestic abuse. This will aid GPs and nurses in the identification of people at risk and prompt accessing historical records to allow previous concerns to be address on subsequent consultations

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation SCCG2

Addressed to Sussex Clinical Commissioning Groups

That GPs and nurses refer to historical records during consultations to enable any outstanding health issues to be identified and discussed

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation SCCG3

Addressed to Sussex Clinical Commissioning Groups

Following significant events at the surgery, where risk to individuals has been identified, that a review is undertaken to ensure all relevant information is shared around identified risks.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation SCCG4

Addressed to Sussex Clinical Commissioning Groups

That the practice implements a domestic abuse policy outlining the roles and responsibilities of staff, as well as resources to support people using and working for the practice.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation SCFT1

Addressed to Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust

Uckfield SCFT Minor Injuries Unit to raise awareness of the signs of domestic abuse and the appropriate pathways to seek support for the victim

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation SCFT2

Addressed to Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust

Wider East Sussex SCFT Minor Injuries Units (Lewes and Crowborough) to raise awareness of the signs of domestic abuse and the appropriate pathways to seek support for the victim

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation SCFT3

Addressed to Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust

Wider SCFT Minor Injuries and Urgent Treatment Centres: • To raise awareness of the signs of domestic abuse and the appropriate pathways to seek support for the victim • Raise internal awareness of SCFT IMR findings

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation SP1

Addressed to Sussex Police

The Head of Public Protection should ensure that a review of DASH risk assessment is incorporated within the ongoing force DA Improvement Plan to ensure that the level of risk is being appropriately identified / graded by officers and staff. This review should be undertaken as soon as practicable.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation SPFT1

Addressed to Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

Lack of known and understood legal restrictions gave the perpetrator the choice to disengage with services and decline depot medication. His Care Plan and engagement was reliant on the perpetrator making contact and attending appointments when he was clear that he did not believe that this was necessary, there was no contingency for disengagement despite a history of disengaging and becoming unwell. All patients deemed at risk of disengagement from services will have a risk management plan.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation SPFT2

Addressed to Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

Positive plans for engagement to be clearly documented with any restrictions or alerts to be discussed with Multi-Disciplinary Team.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation SPFT3

Addressed to Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

Ensure that patients that have been de-registered from a GP are supported to re-register and that prescriptions are delivered to a community pharmacy so assurance can be sought re collection.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation SPFT4

Addressed to Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

Where engagement is an issue, consideration of use of mental health act should be discussed and documented with a rationale for decision making.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation SPFT6

Addressed to Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

Protocol to be put in place to ensure that all eligible patients receive a Section 117 discharge meeting.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation SPFT8

Addressed to Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

Protocol to be developed to ensure that information shared by MARAC is accessible, checked by all Lead Practitioners and incorporated into risk management plans.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗