About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review
Gwynedd review
CSP: GwyneddPublished: November 2023Year of death: 2012Extracted: 14 recs
Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.
The review identified concerns regarding multi-agency communication, information sharing, and risk assessment practices, particularly concerning the perpetrator's mental health and its impact on the victim and family. There were also issues with compliance with the Care Programme Approach and statutory carer assessment requirements.
Home Office classifications
22 tags
Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.
Victim - was a carer
Victim - carer for perpetrator
Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (victim and perpetrator)
Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between victims)
Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between perpetrators)
Children - living with victim (including adult children)
Children - living with perpetrator (including adult children)
Children - present at homicide (including adult children)
Child - primary address same as victim
Perpetrator - case heard in court
Perpetrator - mental ill health
Perpetrator - anxiety
Perpetrator - depression
Perpetrator - psychosis
Perpetrator - supervised by mental health services
DHR process - family contributed to dhr
DHR process - health services recommendations
DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
DHR process - policy recommendation themes
DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
DHR process - other recommendation themes
Extracted recommendations
14 recommendations pulled from the report · 13 matched to organisations in the index
Addressed to
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
That BCUHB ensure that all appropriate staff (including General Practitioners, Consultant Psychiatrists, Health Visitors, Midwives and others) attend the multi-agency re-launch events for this protocol;
Addressed to
Gwynedd & Ynys Môn Safeguarding Board
That the Gwynedd & Ynys Môn Safeguarding Board ensures that all appropriate staff (including Education) attends the multi-agency re-launch events for this protocol.
All POVA referrals should be made on the designated POVA referral form and screened by the Local Authority POVA coordinator with actions/decisions recorded.
Addressed to
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board | Cyngor Gwynedd | HAFAL
BCUHB and Cyngor Gwynedd should review the arrangements for undertaking Carer Assessments and their compliance with statutory requirements and guidance Service level agreement and role of HAFAL should be reviewed It is also recommended that HAFAL undertake an audit of any parallel arrangements across Wales.
Addressed to
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board | Cyngor Gwynedd
The Mental health service provider (The Local Health Board and Local Authorities) should develop and implement a standardised approach to risk assessment. In providing a robust and quantifiable framework for the assessment of risk, such an approach should seek to minimise the potential for: harm to self (including deliberate self harm) suicide harm to others (including violence) self neglect adverse risks associated with abuse of alcohol or substances social vulnerability.
Addressed to
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board | Cyngor Gwynedd
BCUHB and the Local Authority should complete the review of the Community Mental Health Team and implement the Serious Case Review Report action plan. This should include: Consideration of the roles and responsibilities of team members for the supervision of cases held as care co-ordinators and for managerial / professional supervision. This will need to take into account professional body supervision guidelines, relevant CPG supervision guidelines and the role of the health care professional as an autonomous practitioner. Establishing one point of entry for all referrals into the team including those addressed direct to the consultant. Review the Protocol for allocation of (and assignment of Care Co-ordinator to) clients to ensure that it is led by the clinical need of the client whilst taking into account geography, capacity and work load. Establishing processes to ensure that all members of the team are aware of each client’s required needs and the implications of this for the development of Care and Treatment Plans. Ensuring that all assessments and care plans of clients with a family must reflect on the impact of their mental health on the family and any children even if there is no perceived risk to the family. Ensuring that the team have processes in place to ensure all clients on the caseload of the team are reviewed at a weekly meeting on a regular basis. Ensuring that all risk management plans should be discussed with colleagues to ensure access to clinicians’ collective skills and experience, awareness of potential hazards and clients’ early warning signs and to prevent team members working in isolation. Reviewing and developing a robust single discharge procedure and, Ensuring that all team members should keep accurate and full notes to include assessments and reasons behind key decisions made, and that documents are not post-dated.