About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Gwynedd review

CSP: Gwynedd Published: November 2023 Year of death: 2012 Extracted: 14 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identified concerns regarding multi-agency communication, information sharing, and risk assessment practices, particularly concerning the perpetrator's mental health and its impact on the victim and family. There were also issues with compliance with the Care Programme Approach and statutory carer assessment requirements.

Home Office classifications

22 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - was a carer
  • Victim - carer for perpetrator
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (victim and perpetrator)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between victims)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between perpetrators)
  • Children - living with victim (including adult children)
  • Children - living with perpetrator (including adult children)
  • Children - present at homicide (including adult children)
  • Child - primary address same as victim
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - anxiety
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - psychosis
  • Perpetrator - supervised by mental health services
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

14 recommendations pulled from the report · 13 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1a

Addressed to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board

That BCUHB ensure that all appropriate staff (including General Practitioners, Consultant Psychiatrists, Health Visitors, Midwives and others) attend the multi-agency re-launch events for this protocol;

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 1b

Addressed to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board

That the Protocol is circulated to all mental health teams (appropriate staff) with confirmation of receipt and distribution.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 1c

Addressed to Gwynedd & Ynys Môn Safeguarding Board

That the Gwynedd & Ynys Môn Safeguarding Board ensures that all appropriate staff (including Education) attends the multi-agency re-launch events for this protocol.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to Gwynedd Community Safety Partnership | North Wales Police | Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board | Cyngor Gwynedd

In relation to the management of CID’s 16, the ongoing work of the multi-agency safeguarding hub CID 16’s needs to be completed.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Cyngor Gwynedd

All POVA referrals should be made on the designated POVA referral form and screened by the Local Authority POVA coordinator with actions/decisions recorded.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board | Cyngor Gwynedd | HAFAL

BCUHB and Cyngor Gwynedd should review the arrangements for undertaking Carer Assessments and their compliance with statutory requirements and guidance Service level agreement and role of HAFAL should be reviewed It is also recommended that HAFAL undertake an audit of any parallel arrangements across Wales.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board | Cyngor Gwynedd

The Mental health service provider (The Local Health Board and Local Authorities) should develop and implement a standardised approach to risk assessment. In providing a robust and quantifiable framework for the assessment of risk, such an approach should seek to minimise the potential for:
 harm to self (including deliberate self harm)
 suicide
 harm to others (including violence)
 self neglect
 adverse risks associated with abuse of alcohol or substances
 social vulnerability.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board

In accordance with the Enhanced Care Programme, BCUHB should ensure that care plans and risk assessments are reviewed regularly.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 7

Addressed to Cyngor Gwynedd

The Local Authority should ensure that community and faith groups are provided with guidance in relation to the protection of vulnerable adults.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8

Addressed to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board

BCUHB should add Mental Health Problems to the midwife to HV Liaison Form

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9

Addressed to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board

BCUHB should audit a sample of health visiting and midwifery records in accordance with their record keeping policy.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 10

Addressed to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board

BCUHB should review their governance arrangements for the return and storage of post natal midwifery records.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 11

Addressed to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board

BCUHB consider ways of increasing engagement with fathers/significant males and ensure that this is documented accordingly in records.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 12

Addressed to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board | Cyngor Gwynedd

BCUHB and the Local Authority should complete the review of the Community Mental Health Team and implement the Serious Case Review Report action plan. This should include:
 Consideration of the roles and responsibilities of team members for the supervision of cases held as care co-ordinators and for managerial / professional supervision. This will need to take into account professional body supervision guidelines, relevant CPG supervision guidelines and the role of the health care professional as an autonomous practitioner.
 Establishing one point of entry for all referrals into the team including those addressed direct to the consultant.
 Review the Protocol for allocation of (and assignment of Care Co-ordinator to) clients to ensure that it is led by the clinical need of the client whilst taking into account geography, capacity and work load.
 Establishing processes to ensure that all members of the team are aware of each client’s required needs and the implications of this for the development of Care and Treatment Plans.
 Ensuring that all assessments and care plans of clients with a family must reflect on the impact of their mental health on the family and any children even if there is no perceived risk to the family.
 Ensuring that the team have processes in place to ensure all clients on the caseload of the team are reviewed at a weekly meeting on a regular basis.
 Ensuring that all risk management plans should be discussed with colleagues to ensure access to clinicians’ collective skills and experience, awareness of potential hazards and clients’ early warning signs and to prevent team members working in isolation.
 Reviewing and developing a robust single discharge procedure and,
 Ensuring that all team members should keep accurate and full notes to include assessments and reasons behind key decisions made, and that documents are not post-dated.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗