About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Barking and Dagenham review

CSP: Barking and Dagenham Published: November 2023 Year of death: 2015 Extracted: 33 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The report identifies concerns regarding inadequate multi-agency information sharing, particularly around safeguarding alerts and financial abuse. It highlights issues with deteriorating living conditions, missed hospital appointments, and a lack of holistic assessments for the victim's complex needs and the perpetrator's caring capacity.

Home Office classifications

27 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - physical disability
  • Victim - serious or life limiting illness
  • Children - living with victim (including adult children)
  • Children - living with perpetrator (including adult children)
  • Children - present at homicide (including adult children)
  • Child - primary address same as victim
  • Perpetrator - different gender identity from birth
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - was a carer
  • Perpetrator - carer for victim
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - anxiety
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Aggravating factors - economic abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family consulted about terms of reference
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - social services recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - housing services recommendations
  • DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

33 recommendations pulled from the report · 7 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 4

Addressed to All agencies

All agencies working with those with long-term illnesses should ensure that each review routinely includes an assessment of a person's psychological and mental resilience and wellbeing, the up to date management of any adverse symptoms, and information about informal sources of specialist support.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to All agencies

All practitioners should ensure that their case recording is detailed and clear and all assessments are reflective and state reasons for assessment decisions backed up by examples which provide evidence for professional judgement. Quality should be addressed by management in supervision and via annual file audits.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to All agencies

All agencies must ensure their staff are fully trained and compliant with safeguarding procedures and that concerns and alerts are fully and accurately recorded including time, date, who made the contact and name of person contacted, discussions with managers and actions agreed. Consultation with all involved agencies must take place before closure of the safeguarding alert. Auditing of staff training and compliance with procedures to be built into supervision, and annual staff development plans.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 7

Addressed to All agencies

The formation of a multidisciplinary team as recommended by NICE Guidance (NG27) December 2015 should be put in place for those with complex needs and life limiting illness who are living at home to ensure an holistic approach is taken to risk assessment and their needs, which includes the identification of a named coordinator, and a structure of regular multi-disciplinary reviews. It is recommended that the Camden High Risk model is investigated.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9

Addressed to Agencies

Agencies should ensure that staff are aware of the local authority hoarding policy, of the issues around hoarding including its impact on mental health, day to day functioning, and home safety, and the steps to take where hoarding is identified.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 10

Addressed to All agencies

All staff who have responsibility for adult assessments or visiting patients/service users in their own homes must have in-depth domestic abuse training which also includes elder abuse by partners and family carers, and high risk groups such as those with disabilities and/or mental illness. It is recommended that this training is mandatory.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 11

Addressed to All agencies

Up to date and easily accessible information and resources available for front line practitioners around hoarding, domestic abuse, and coercive and controlling behaviour should be reissued and publicised to staff.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 12

Addressed to All agencies

A scanned copy of all service user signed documents should be uploaded onto their electronic record within 7 days of signing to ensure clarity and confirmation of agreements and provision of services.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 13

Addressed to All agencies

Assumptions or not of mental capacity must be clearly recorded as well as the reasoning behind the assumption. Where capacity is doubted then formal assessment should take place and be recorded.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 14

Addressed to London Borough of Barking & Dagenham

All staff to have regular training with regards to safeguarding, risk assessment and issues of mental capacity. London Borough of Barking & Dagenham to consider setting a mandatory timescale for refresher courses.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 15

Addressed to London Borough of Barking & Dagenham

The new electronic data base planned by the Borough needs to have the functionality that enables key information, current or previous safeguarding alerts, and risks to be identified quickly by social workers not familiar with the case.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 16

Addressed to All agencies

Checks with all professionals involved with a service user should be part of all case closure processes as standard, recorded clearly, and checked for completion before management sign-off. Auditing of this process to be built into management supervision and an annual compliance audit implemented.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 17

Addressed to Adult Social Care

Reassessments at the time of case closure must be fully entered onto the Adult Social Care database ensuring that the rationale for closure is recorded, risk assessed and how any risks will be managed in future. Procedures to be updated and auditing of this process to be built into management supervision and an annual compliance audit implemented.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 18

Addressed to All agencies

Training should be provided to enhance the skills of all staff involved in undertaking carer assessments to ensure the willingness and ability of a potential carer and to encourage the uptake of carer training as recommended by NICE Guidelines. The staff must have previously undertaken domestic abuse training to qualify for this.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 19

Addressed to Housing Department

Where a vulnerable tenant has been identified by a housing officer they should discuss this with their manager as to the required frequency of the next tenancy audit. Discussion should focus upon at least annual visits unless evidence suggest that this is not required.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 20

Addressed to Housing Department

All housing officers should complete Adult Safeguarding Training and Domestic Abuse Training.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 21

Addressed to Housing Department

Social worker and other support staff's details are to be recorded on the contact screen by housing officers and rent officers within 24 hours of capturing this information.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 22

Addressed to Housing Department

Where a request for garden cultivation is requested the housing officer should complete the application form with the tenant at their property to ensure that the home is also inspected.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 23

Addressed to Housing Department

All first Tenancy Audits to be completed for all Council properties by the existing deadline of 30 November 2016. (Not fully completed by this date - being monitored by Action Plan).

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 24

Addressed to Housing Department

At the time contractors carrying out repairs, or at the annual inspection made by gas engineers, the housing officer should be updated within 24 hours where a property is found to be in an unacceptable condition.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 25

Addressed to Housing Department

Advice notes are to be loaded by housing officers with details of tenants' disability as per the new 2016 procedures.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 26

Addressed to GP Practice

A record of all services with whom a patient is in engaged (i.e. MS society, Integrated Care Team, Social Services, etc) and the interactions these services have with the patient, must be routinely recorded on the patient's medical record. If the patient's home has a key safe, all agencies must be informed that the key safe code lies with the GP.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 27

Addressed to GP Practice

The GP practice should ensure that they hold a register of patients who have caring responsibilities to inform any need for additional support. The register should be reviewed annually to ensure its accuracy.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 28

Addressed to GP Practice

Where a patient known to have a debilitating or life limiting illness fails to attend hospital appointments more than once there should be follow up including a home visit, to ensure that the patient knows they have an appointment, has the means to attend, and are not being prevented from attending for any reason.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 29

Addressed to GP Practice

In addition to ensuring all patients with multiple sclerosis are referred to the community MS specialist nurse, the practice should ensure that patients are referred to a suitable support agency such as the MS Society or MS Trust UK.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 30

Addressed to GP Practice

The practice should put in place a clear strategy for managing patients with multiple sclerosis in line with best practice which includes multidisciplinary reviews of their mental wellbeing as well as their physical symptoms, and consideration of how their carer is coping.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 31

Addressed to GP Practice | District Nursing Service | Community Treatment Team

A system of regular updates on a patient with long term illness should be established between the GP practice and the District Nursing Service and Community Treatment Team.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 32

Addressed to District Nursing Service

The District Nursing Service should review their recording system to ensure that there is electronic back-up to handheld patient notes which can be shared by nurses prior to and after visiting patients and to record any safeguarding concerns or alerts.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 33

Addressed to North East London Foundation NHS Trust

The Trust should publicise the Community Specialist Multiple Sclerosis Nursing Service within Barking & Dagenham among GPs, Adult Social Care, Occupational Therapy, and allied professionals, and patients and families affected by the disease as soon as possible. This should be completed no later than December 2016. (This has been completed -See Action Plan)

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 34

Addressed to North East London Foundation NHS Trust

Details of the allocated MS Nurse for each Directorate within NELFT should be identified to the relevant District Nursing teams to ensure timely referrals may be made when additional support may be required to an individual patient.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 35

Addressed to Nursing staff

There should be a strengthening of the Think Family approach when nursing staff are providing services for adults with care and support needs. Staff should use professional curiosity regarding carers, being aware of the carer’s needs assessment and outcome as this affects patient care.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 36

Addressed to North East London Foundation NHS Trust

To continue the roll-out across all NELFT directorates, agile working to allow staff to remotely access electronic patient records and update accordingly.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 37

Addressed to Barking, Havering & Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust

Barking, Havering & Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust to strengthen their Patient Access Policy section on Did Not Attend with the addition of issues to consider when vulnerable adults Do Not Attend, and guidance to staff of steps to take when they have concerns.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗