About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Stockport review

CSP: Stockport Published: September 2023 Year of death: 2012 Extracted: 6 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The report identifies concerns regarding inadequate multi-agency information sharing and integrated risk assessment, particularly concerning the impact of parental mental health on children and the needs of young carers. It also highlights missed opportunities in domestic abuse risk assessment and safety planning by police, and follow-up for high-risk self-referrals to alcohol services.

Home Office classifications

36 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - was a carer
  • Victim - carer assessed
  • Victim - alcohol misuse
  • Victim - housing issues
  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - depression
  • Victim - suicidal thoughts
  • Victim - suicide attempts
  • Victim - serious or life limiting illness
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (victim and perpetrator)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between victims)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between perpetrators)
  • Children - living with perpetrator (including adult children)
  • Children - subject to child protection or domestic abuse prior to homicide
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - was a carer
  • Perpetrator - carer assessed
  • Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
  • Perpetrator - substance misuse
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - psychosis
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
  • DHR process - police recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

6 recommendations pulled from the report · 2 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1a

Addressed to Local Safeguarding Children Board

The case highlights a number of missed opportunities in relation to safeguarding the children in this case. The Panel recommends that the Local Safeguarding Children Board should initiate a multi-agency practice review of safeguarding children living in families where there are multiple complex needs and where one or both of the parents have mental health problems.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 1b

Addressed to Local Safeguarding Children Board | All Agencies

The needs of MVD1 were not fully assessed or responded to. Despite her significant responsibilities as a young carer, and the fact that she lived with two vulnerable adults and three siblings with chronic medical conditions, she was not an open case to CSC, having never received a CAF assessment. As recommended in 1a above, the LSCB should ensure that the learning review considers the fitness for purpose of multi-agency policies and procedures in relation to the needs of Young Carers. Following the learning review all agencies should update their policy in relation to supporting young carers, recognising and meeting their specific needs.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 1c

Addressed to Local Safeguarding Children Board

As part of the LSCB learning review the processes and systems for information sharing with voluntary sector agencies should receive focus. This should ensure that voluntary and third sector agencies have equal access to relevant information to safeguard vulnerable adults and children.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to CCG

The CCG should be assured, by audit evidence, that the training delivered to and the supervision received by Pennine Care NHS FT (Mental Health) staff thoroughly explores the impact of adult mental health on parenting capacity including staff’s responsibilities if concerns are identified.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Drug and Alcohol Joint Commissioning Group

The victim was advised to refer to alcohol services and consented to this however, current practice does not require self-referral advice to be followed up by services. The DHR panel recommend that it would be good practice to initiate referrals in cases where the adult is particularly vulnerable or high risk (i.e. where there has been a serious attempt at self-harm). The Drug and Alcohol Joint Commissioning Group should develop the assessment and referral pathways for alcohol misuse where there are co-factors of mental health and domestic abuse. The aim should be to ensure that high risk adults with complex needs are referred to services and that the referral is followed up

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Safer Stockport Partnership

Developing the skills and capacity of the local workforce in relation to identifying, referring and responding to domestic abuse is key to the success of the local domestic abuse strategy. The Safer Stockport Partnership should give specific focus to workforce development in its revised domestic abuse strategy, the focus should be on ensuring that all agencies build confidence amongst their workforce in dealing with domestic abuse.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗