About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review
Stockport review
CSP: StockportPublished: September 2023Year of death: 2012Extracted: 6 recs
Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.
The report identifies concerns regarding inadequate multi-agency information sharing and integrated risk assessment, particularly concerning the impact of parental mental health on children and the needs of young carers. It also highlights missed opportunities in domestic abuse risk assessment and safety planning by police, and follow-up for high-risk self-referrals to alcohol services.
Home Office classifications
36 tags
Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.
Victim - was a carer
Victim - carer assessed
Victim - alcohol misuse
Victim - housing issues
Victim - mental ill health
Victim - depression
Victim - suicidal thoughts
Victim - suicide attempts
Victim - serious or life limiting illness
Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (victim and perpetrator)
Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between victims)
Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between perpetrators)
Children - living with perpetrator (including adult children)
Children - subject to child protection or domestic abuse prior to homicide
Perpetrator - case heard in court
Perpetrator - was a carer
Perpetrator - carer assessed
Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
Perpetrator - substance misuse
Perpetrator - mental ill health
Perpetrator - depression
Perpetrator - psychosis
Aggravating factors - separation
Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
DHR process - police recommendations
DHR process - health services recommendations
DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
DHR process - training recommendation themes
DHR process - policy recommendation themes
DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
DHR process - other recommendation themes
Extracted recommendations
6 recommendations pulled from the report · 2 matched to organisations in the index
The case highlights a number of missed opportunities in relation to safeguarding the children in this case. The Panel recommends that the Local Safeguarding Children Board should initiate a multi-agency practice review of safeguarding children living in families where there are multiple complex needs and where one or both of the parents have mental health problems.
Addressed to
Local Safeguarding Children Board | All Agencies
The needs of MVD1 were not fully assessed or responded to. Despite her significant responsibilities as a young carer, and the fact that she lived with two vulnerable adults and three siblings with chronic medical conditions, she was not an open case to CSC, having never received a CAF assessment. As recommended in 1a above, the LSCB should ensure that the learning review considers the fitness for purpose of multi-agency policies and procedures in relation to the needs of Young Carers. Following the learning review all agencies should update their policy in relation to supporting young carers, recognising and meeting their specific needs.
As part of the LSCB learning review the processes and systems for information sharing with voluntary sector agencies should receive focus. This should ensure that voluntary and third sector agencies have equal access to relevant information to safeguard vulnerable adults and children.
The CCG should be assured, by audit evidence, that the training delivered to and the supervision received by Pennine Care NHS FT (Mental Health) staff thoroughly explores the impact of adult mental health on parenting capacity including staff’s responsibilities if concerns are identified.
Addressed to
Drug and Alcohol Joint Commissioning Group
The victim was advised to refer to alcohol services and consented to this however, current practice does not require self-referral advice to be followed up by services. The DHR panel recommend that it would be good practice to initiate referrals in cases where the adult is particularly vulnerable or high risk (i.e. where there has been a serious attempt at self-harm). The Drug and Alcohol Joint Commissioning Group should develop the assessment and referral pathways for alcohol misuse where there are co-factors of mental health and domestic abuse. The aim should be to ensure that high risk adults with complex needs are referred to services and that the referral is followed up
Developing the skills and capacity of the local workforce in relation to identifying, referring and responding to domestic abuse is key to the success of the local domestic abuse strategy. The Safer Stockport Partnership should give specific focus to workforce development in its revised domestic abuse strategy, the focus should be on ensuring that all agencies build confidence amongst their workforce in dealing with domestic abuse.