About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Sheffield review

CSP: Sheffield Published: September 2023 Extracted: 9 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The DHR found the homicide was unexpected, with no prior history of domestic abuse known to agencies or family. The perpetrator was later diagnosed with undiagnosed behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. Key concerns include the difficulty in early dementia diagnosis, lack of professional curiosity regarding older adults' disengagement from primary care, and challenges in assessing mental health in emergency settings.

Home Office classifications

15 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - physical disability
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - cognitive disorder (dementia or alzheimer's disease)
  • Perpetrator - serious or life limiting illness
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - social services recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

9 recommendations pulled from the report · 2 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Sheffield CCG

Non-response to annual health checks, cancer screening programmes and immunisations: Sheffield CCG requests that GP practices review their policies regarding non-response to annual health checks, cancer screening programmes and immunisations. Practices should ensure that capacity to decline the appointment is assessed and that reasonable adjustments are made for those who lack capacity.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to Sheffield CCG

Named Accountable GP: Sheffield CCG will request guidance on the role of the Named Accountable GP from NHS England and circulate this.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Sheffield CCG

Accompanying persons: Sheffield CCG will encourage clinicians in GP practices to document who each patient attends their appointments with.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6.2.1

Addressed to Primary care | Carers centres | Dementia assessment services | Memory clinics | Adult social care

Dementia and risk: To remind partner agencies that risk assessment is part of the care planning procedure in people living with dementia and this should include risk to others. This is relevant to primary care, carers centres, dementia assessment services/ memory clinics and adult social care.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6.2.2

Addressed to Adult Safeguarding Partnership

Processes to support older adults experiencing domestic abuse: Adult Safeguarding Partnership to seek reassurances that local processes are fit for purpose with regards to supporting people over the age of 65 where there may be mental health and domestic abuse concerns.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6.2.3

Addressed to Alzheimer’s Society

Raising awareness with older adult groups: The report will be shared with the Alzheimer’s Society locally and nationally and an offer will be made to discuss joint working to raise awareness of some of the issues in DA and older adults.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6.2.4

Addressed to CPS | Prison Service

Raising family concerns about treatment of older adults in the judicial system: the Panel feel that it is important to acknowledge the family’s concerns and will write to the agencies concerned (CPS and Prison Service) to pass on the family’s concerns about how their mother was treated in the judicial system.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6.2.5

Addressed to DACT

Recommendations for future DHRs: 1) Alleged perpetrators should be asked for access to defence reports 2) When alleged perpetrators have established or suspected cognitive problems approaches to them concerning their involvement and access to their information need to be cognisant of, and compliant with, mental capacity legislation.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6.2.6

Addressed to Home Office

Recommendation for Home Office consideration: it would be helpful for the Home Office to communicate with the Law Society and the Prison Service about best practice in engagement with DHRs.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗