About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review
Rotherham review
CSP: RotherhamPublished: September 2023Year of death: 2011Extracted: 17 recs
Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.
The review identified inconsistent use of risk assessment tools and application across agencies, leading to missed opportunities for high-risk referrals to MARAC and IDVA. There were also failures to escalate concerns and apply 'near miss' policies, alongside a lack of clear national guidance for reporting serious injuries without the victim's consent.
Home Office classifications
16 tags
Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.
Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
Perpetrator - case heard in court
Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
Aggravating factors - separation
Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
DHR process - police recommendations
DHR process - health services recommendations
DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
DHR process - training recommendation themes
DHR process - policy recommendation themes
DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
DHR process - other recommendation themes
Extracted recommendations
17 recommendations pulled from the report · 7 matched to organisations in the index
Consideration should be given to the national guidance for reporting gunshot and knife injuries without the consent of the victim being reviewed with a view to including life threatening injuries caused by other means.
The Home Office is invited to consider the current ‘near miss’ policy identified by the Safer Rotherham Partnership for wider dissemination and implementation.
Addressed to
Home Office | Victim Support National Homicide Service
At a national level, consideration given to the Victim Support National Homicide Service funding and policy, with particular reference to engagement following criminality and clearer guidance as to what constitutes a ‘homicide’.
The Safer Rotherham Partnership is well aware that raising public awareness of domestic abuse is an on-going process. The partnership should be clear that Domestic Abuse is wider than physical violence and should include all types of abuse, including coercive control. It should also include that abuse is age neutral effecting both women and men. The public awareness programme should be delivered regularly throughout the year and be accessible to all. It should be examined to ensure it identifies all aspects of abuse and that it can deliver appropriate outcomes.
The Safer Rotherham Partnership ‘near miss’ policy should be updated to require immediate notification to the DAPG via the DAC rather than delaying referrals to the next scheduled meeting.
The SRP MARAC Protocol and near miss protocol should be updated and explicitly state the need to share information where there is an indication of serious injury and professional judgement indicates this should be assessed as high risk should be referred to MARAC and IDVA without delay
In the absence of national guidance, the Safer Rotherham Partnership should develop a local protocol to ensure life threatening injuries caused by other means are identified and highlighted appropriately
IMR author training should be provided to all agencies within the Safer Rotherham Partnership and to 3rd sector organisations. The training should include critical analysis as a key component.
Inevitably, when organisations differ on the identification, assessment and level of service provided there is a greater chance that potential victims and perpetrators will be overlooked and opportunities to intervene will be missed. There should be a standardisation within the Safer Rotherham Partnership of risk assessment processes including risk assessment tools.
Domestic Abuse training for all agencies within the Safer Rotherham Partnership should include what to do in the event of negative disclosure and that further information re Domestic Abuse is available to all staff via its website.
Domestic Abuse training for the Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust should include what to do in the event of negative disclosure and that further information re Domestic Abuse is available to all Trust staff via its website.
The Trust should give active support to A&E staff undertaking DASH risk assessments and their domestic abuse policy should be revised to reflect negative disclosure.