About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

St Helens review

CSP: St Helens Published: September 2023 Year of death: 2004 Extracted: 3 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identified missed opportunities to assess the perpetrator's role as a carer, particularly given his own mental health issues and the victim's increasing dependency. Concerns were also raised about the detail in GP records, medication management, and the need to address the stigma of mental health in older people.

Home Office classifications

18 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - anxiety
  • Victim - depression
  • Perpetrator - was a carer
  • Perpetrator - carer for victim
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - anxiety
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - died by suicide
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

3 recommendations pulled from the report · 2 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 14.1

Addressed to St. Helens Community Safety Partnership | Primary Care Services | 5 Borough Partnership NHS Foundation Trust | Age UK Mid Mersey | Chrysalis Centre for Change | Helena Partnerships

The panel recommends that relevant agencies consider the development of a protocol where elderly persons identified as carers and where mental health features in the relationship, are signposted as appropriate to primary care, secondary care and 3rd party sectors to ensure access to help and support.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 14.2

Addressed to St. Helens Community Safety Partnership | St. Helens Council | NHS St. Helens CCG | 5 Borough Partnership NHS Foundation Trust | Age UK Mid Mersey | Chrysalis Centre for Change | Helena Partnerships

The panel considers that the case could be recognised as an opportunity to deliver a local publicity campaign to challenge perceptions and heighten awareness around mental health and the elderly. The campaign could target not just the elderly, but families, carers, and those practitioners working closest with the elderly, to educate and breakdown barriers and stigmas associated with mental health, to promote health and wellbeing and to promote services available.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 14.3

Addressed to GP practice 1 | GP practice 2

The panel recommends that the issues regarding drugs dosage and interactions identified by the review (see sections 9.13/14 overview report) are formally reported to GP practice 2 as learning points, and the value of meaningful detailed patient notes, the recording of decisions and rationale be considered as learning points for both GP practices. (see section 9.15 overview report.)

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗