About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Norfolk review

CSP: Norfolk Published: September 2023 Year of death: 2015 Extracted: 14 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The report identifies concerns regarding agencies' recognition and assessment of domestic abuse, particularly psychological and coercive control, and its impact on the victim's mental health. Gaps in inter-agency communication, risk escalation processes, and support for older victims facing specific barriers were also highlighted.

Home Office classifications

25 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - died by suicide
  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - anxiety
  • Victim - suicidal thoughts
  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to health services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to friends as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family consulted about terms of reference
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - police recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - idva or other domestic abuse support service recommendations
  • DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

14 recommendations pulled from the report · 7 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Home Office

That Home Office Multi-agency Statutory Guidance for the Conduct of Domestic Homicide Reviews S2(4) be amended to specifically include GP practices as having a duty to actively participate in DHRs including attendance at panel meetings, and have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to NHS England

It is recommended that a clause is added to the NHS GP contract to mandate their active participation in Domestic Homicide Reviews (DHRs) and Safeguarding Adult Reviews (SARs).

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Intercollegiate Guidance bodies | NICE

That Intercollegiate Guidance for adult safeguarding which informs national training should include specific focus on domestic abuse & coercive control including recognition of risk, applying the link between domestic abuse and mental health to assessments, and a process to escalate those risks and concerns. This should link with NICE Quality Standards 116 - Domestic Violence, Quality Standards 1, 2, 3 and 4 published 29 February 2016.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to NHS England

In recognition of Coroner’s Inquest findings NHS England should write into the contracts of all GPs that all GP practices ensure that: a) they have a stand-alone policy & referral pathway for patients experiencing physical, psychological, financial or emotional domestic abuse and/or coercive and controlling behaviours from a partner, former partner or family member. b) the referral pathway clearly advises practitioners how to refer to specialist domestic abuse services who can provide the appropriate practical advice, legal options, safety planning and emotional support. c) they identify a domestic abuse lead, who has specialist domestic abuse training, and who then leads on the practice’s response to concerns on domestic abuse for individual patients. d) they have in place clear guidance and a method of recognising and escalating when a patient's request to speak to their GP (where domestic abuse is expected/anticipated) requires an immediate response, or in their GPs absence an appropriate escalation process is activated.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Norfolk County Community Safety Partnership

The County's Domestic Abuse Change Programme and the Domestic Abuse Champions initiative to ensure that all appropriate services and advice agencies have processes in place by September 2016 to identify those experiencing domestic abuse with a particular focus on those experiencing coercive and controlling behaviours and that agencies have a clear pathway to domestic abuse support services.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to Chair and Members of Norfolk's Community Safety Partnership | Chief Constable, Norfolk Constabulary | Norfolk Police & Crime Commissioner | Chief Officer, of the relevant Local Authority Area | Chief Officer, Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust | Community Services Manager, Leeway Domestic Violence & Abuse Service | Chief Officer, of the relevant Clinical Commissioning Group | Chair of the Norfolk Health & Wellbeing Board | Norfolk Domestic Abuse & Sexual Violence Board | Independent Chair

All agencies to whom the Review is disseminated ensure staff are briefed on the findings, recommendations and learning, and to confirm this has been completed to the County Community Safety Partnership by July 2016.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 7

Addressed to Norfolk County Community Safety Partnership

All domestic abuse training content should be reviewed by June 2016 to ensure that: (a) Older victims of domestic abuse and the additional barriers they face form part of the training. (b) The content of training covering psychological abuse and coercive and controlling behaviour is covered in sufficient depth and takes into account the Home Office 'Controlling or Coercive Behaviour in an Intimate or Family Relationship Statutory Guidance Framework, December 2015', to enable practitioners to identify its effects and support victims appropriately. (c) Training should include reinforcing the importance of record keeping, particularly the use of a chronology to record information about all abusive and controlling behaviours experienced by a victim to identify and evidence any pattern of abuse. (d) Completion of risk assessment should include clarity of the mental well-being of the person being assessed, e.g. depressed and/or suicidal.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8

Addressed to Norfolk Constabulary

A review of the MASH’s current capacity and capability is recommended by end May 2016 to identify what extra resources or funding streams would be required to enable experienced staff within the MASH to assess all domestic crimes and incidents recorded by officers.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 9

Addressed to Norfolk Constabulary

A process of continued training and message dissemination should be put in place by the end of April 2016 describing the role of the MASH, its key roles and responsibilities, and including details of the support and advice that officers can expect and the process for obtaining that advice.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 10

Addressed to Emily's GP Practice

The GP practice to have a stand-alone domestic abuse policy & referral pathway to guide staff seeing patients experiencing physical, psychological, financial or emotional domestic abuse and/or coercive and controlling behaviours, risk assessment, & how to refer to specialist domestic abuse services by March 2016.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 11

Addressed to Leeway Domestic Violence & Abuse Service

Leeway to provide an aide memoire for front line officers and agency staff by April 2016 to inform agencies of the range of services Leeway provides and how to access them.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 12

Addressed to Leeway Domestic Violence & Abuse Service

When delivering training Leeway is recommended to keep a register of attendees to show the name of the person and their role within the agency receiving the training.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 13

Addressed to Age UK Norwich

It is recommended that by July 2016 Age UK Norwich put in place a stand-alone domestic abuse policy and referral pathway for their staff and volunteers separate to their safeguarding policy.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 14

Addressed to Age UK Norwich

The content of Age UK Norwich domestic abuse training for staff and volunteers who are engaged in the role of advising service users should include awareness of the DASH risk assessment checklist and how to refer on to local specialist domestic abuse agencies according to identified risk. The agency to confirm the inclusion of this content by July 2016.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗