About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Tewkesbury review

CSP: Tewkesbury Published: September 2023 Year of death: 2015 Extracted: 6 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review identifies that the victim made informal disclosures of coercive control to friends and colleagues, but these were not formally reported to agencies, limiting risk assessment opportunities. A lack of understanding of coercive control at the time and the high-risk nature of separation were also noted.

Home Office classifications

27 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - serious or life limiting illness
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to school as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to friends as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to workplace (employer) as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - stalking
  • Aggravating factors - physical stalking
  • Aggravating factors - digital stalking
  • Aggravating factors - sexual abuse
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • Aggravating factors - economic abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family consulted about terms of reference
  • DHR process - family received draft report
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

6 recommendations pulled from the report · 1 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 15.3

Addressed to Community Safety Partnership

The Community Safety Partnership should write to the Law Society and Association of Family Lawyers bringing their attention to this DHR and ask them to consider issuing appropriate guidance.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 15.5

Addressed to Community Safety Partnership

The Community Safety Partnership should use this review to highlight to multi-agency employers/employees multi-agency that there is national guidance in place and that HR can support around concerns of an employee experiencing domestic abuse.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 15.7

Addressed to Community Safety Partnership | County

The Community Safety Partnership and County endorse the ongoing development of multi-partner awareness training around coercive control.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 15.9

Addressed to Community Safety Partnership | County

The Community Safety Partnershipand County to endorse and support the Concordat and take steps to highlight the role of HR in supporting employees who may be experiencing any element of domestic abuse. This should include seeking assurance that HR leads are aware of national guidance and also encourage the use “Working Without Fear” from the Hollie Gazzard Trust (see at Appendix 1) as a practical and up to date toolkit.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 15.15

Addressed to NHS Gloucestershire CCG

This review acknowledges this insight by primary care and adopts the IMR recommendation but the GP in this case demonstrated good and thoughtful practice.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗