About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Wirral review

CSP: Wirral Published: September 2023 Year of death: 2012 Extracted: 4 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
Merseyside Police failed to follow domestic abuse policy, missing opportunities for risk assessment, information gathering, and referrals for the victim. The report also highlights that separation can magnify risk and that emotional/verbal abuse needs greater recognition.

Home Office classifications

29 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (victim and perpetrator)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between victims)
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between perpetrators)
  • Children - living with victim (including adult children)
  • Children - living with perpetrator (including adult children)
  • Child - primary address same as victim
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - alcohol misuse
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - police recommendations
  • DHR process - idva or other domestic abuse support service recommendations
  • DHR process - other educational institution recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

4 recommendations pulled from the report · 4 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Liverpool Law Society | CAFCASS | Family Safety Unit | Merseyside Police

Separation should be seen as process which can magnify risk factors, not a safety plan in itself. All agencies, especially family law solicitors and the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) , should be advised that the period around separation- especially while a couple still share a home- should be seen as a period of enhanced risk of violence, and should advise service users accordingly.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to Merseyside Police | Community Safety Partnership

All Police reception areas in Wirral should be checked to ensure that they have very clear, very visible and up-to-date information on domestic abuse services displayed prominently. Strong consideration of the use of keywords such as ‘verbal abuse’ and ‘bullying in relationship’ should be given in the development of new materials to prompt referrals by and about people who may not consider themselves victims of domestic abuse per se.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Merseyside Police

An audit of Merseyside Police’s compliance with its own domestic abuse policy and procedures should be undertaken in the Wirral in January 2013 to ensure that front line staff are compliant and that VPRF1s are being completed. An audit should be undertaken of the new Inspector reviews of memo books, to ensure that domestic abuse incidents are not being retained on paper-based records.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Merseyside Police

Consider the revision of the VPRF1 to give an immediate and clearly visible score for risk, so that front line staff feel ownership of the risk level, rather than it being left to a specialist team for assessment.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗