About this page. This page summarises a Domestic Homicide Review published in the Home Office DHR Library. The full report is available at the source link below. Victim and perpetrator names are not included in extracted summaries on this page.
Source · Domestic Homicide Review

Oldham review

CSP: Oldham Published: August 2023 Year of death: 2018 Extracted: 9 recs

Statutory domestic homicide review under section 9 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Source: Home Office DHR Library.

Original review (PDF) ↗ Source: Home Office DHR Library

Summary AI-generated

Verify against the full report at the source link
The review highlights systemic issues in recognising and responding to coercive control, inconsistent multi-agency information sharing and risk management for victims, and a lack of trauma-informed practice, particularly regarding childhood trauma and the impact of child removal.

Home Office classifications

50 tags

Source-supplied classifications used by the Home Office to catalogue this review.

  • Victim - substance misuse
  • Victim - mental ill health
  • Victim - anxiety
  • Victim - depression
  • Victim - suicidal thoughts
  • Victim - had been a victim of an abuser before
  • Victim - referred to marac at any time
  • Children - under 18 shared parental responsibility (between perpetrators)
  • Children - living with perpetrator (including adult children)
  • Children - subject to child protection or domestic abuse prior to homicide
  • Children - removed into care
  • Perpetrator - case heard in court
  • Perpetrator - issued life sentence
  • Perpetrator - substance misuse
  • Perpetrator - mental ill health
  • Perpetrator - anxiety
  • Perpetrator - depression
  • Perpetrator - panic attacks
  • Perpetrator - post traumatic stress disorder (ptsd)
  • Perpetrator - suicidal thoughts
  • Perpetrator - known to agencies as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to police as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to health services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to idva or other domestic abuse support service as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to housing services as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to others as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to friends as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Perpetrator - known to family as a domestic abuse perpetrator
  • Aggravating factors - separation
  • Aggravating factors - coercive or controlling behaviour
  • Aggravating factors - stalking
  • Aggravating factors - physical stalking
  • Aggravating factors - psychological or emotional abuse
  • Aggravating factors - physical abuse
  • Aggravating factors - economic abuse
  • DHR process - family contributed to dhr
  • DHR process - family supported by expert specialist advocate
  • DHR process - police recommendations
  • DHR process - health services recommendations
  • DHR process - idva or other domestic abuse support service recommendations
  • DHR process - housing services recommendations
  • DHR process - community safety partnership recommendations
  • DHR process - technology systems recommendation themes
  • DHR process - identification of risk recommendation themes
  • DHR process - training recommendation themes
  • DHR process - policy recommendation themes
  • DHR process - multi agency working recommendation themes
  • DHR process - record keeping recommendation themes
  • DHR process - awareness raising recommendation themes
  • DHR process - other recommendation themes

Extracted recommendations

9 recommendations pulled from the report · 6 matched to organisations in the index

Recommendation 1

Addressed to Domestic Abuse Partnership

The CSCP should review domestic abuse training to ensure that coercive and controlling behaviour is recognised by all agencies as a significant factor in driving the behaviour of victims. The CSCP should also be assured that workforce development and training is put in place to address this apparent gap in professional understanding.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 2

Addressed to Safeguarding Children Partnership | Safeguarding Adults Board

The CSCP, Local Safeguarding Children Partnership and Safeguarding Adults Partnership should collaborate to ensure a strategic focus on strengthening trauma informed practice.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 3

Addressed to Greater Manchester Police

The CSCP should receive assurance from GMP that checks, and balances are in place to ensure that appropriate processes regarding decisions related to ‘Right to Know’ disclosure is in place (in this case referral back to MARAC).

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 4

Addressed to Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust

The CSCP should commission relevant health agencies (via the CCG) that the provision of informal (voluntary) admission of patients with mental health needs is understood, and that this provision is applied in a way which appropriately identifies and manages risk.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 5

Addressed to Greater Manchester Police

The CSCP should examine the current systems for diversion of offenders, including MVOP, and undertake any necessary action to ensure that guidance is being applied and that there are sufficient robust checks and balances in the system to ensure compliance.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 6

Addressed to Domestic Abuse Partnership

In collaboration with the LSCP and SAB the CSCP should receive assurance that ongoing work to strengthen information and services to the families of victims of domestic continues to be a priority and the action plan for supporting families of victims should be refreshed.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 7

Addressed to NHS Oldham Clinical Commissioning Group

The CSCP should receive assurance from the CCG the learning from this and other domestic homicide reviews in relation to the GP’s role in safeguarding victims, as set out in national guidance, is implemented.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8 (Part 1)

Addressed to Safeguarding Children Partnership

The CSCP should work jointly with the local Safeguarding Children Partnership to ensure that up to date and relevant guidance in relation to safeguarding the children of domestic abuse victims is in place. This should include specific focus on multi-agency working and case management to safeguarding children and victims and the duty for professionals to share information in relation to safeguarding children. A Think Family approach should guide this work. It should include the most up to date practice in relation to supporting vulnerable parents in cases where children are removed.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗

Recommendation 8 (Part 2)

Addressed to Safeguarding Children Partnership | Safeguarding Adults Board

The CSCP should work jointly with the local Safeguarding Children Partnership and Safeguarding Adults Board to ensure that guidance relating to the roles of Adults and Children’s Services in supporting domestic abuse victims with children is in place and that ASC and CSC are implementing this guidance.

Verified wording from the published review · Original review (PDF) ↗